Cargando…
Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonomet...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217 |
_version_ | 1783737369834291200 |
---|---|
author | McGarva, Emily Farr, Jane Dabasia, Priya Lawrenson, John G Murdoch, Ian E |
author_facet | McGarva, Emily Farr, Jane Dabasia, Priya Lawrenson, John G Murdoch, Ian E |
author_sort | McGarva, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonometer. This study further explores Icare® HOME patient self-monitoring. METHODS: Patients were trained by standard protocol to use the Icare® HOME rebound tonometer. Patient self-tonometry was compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) over one clinical day. Following this, each patient was instructed to undertake further data collection that evening and over the subsequent two days. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35 eyes) participated. Good agreement was demonstrated between GAT and Icare® HOME for IOPs up to 15 mm Hg. Above this IOP the Icare® tended to over-read, largely explained by 2 patients with corneal thickness >600 um. The mean peak IOP during ‘clinic hours’ phasing was 16.7 mm Hg and 18.5 mm Hg (p = 0.24) over three days. An average range of 5.0, 7.0 and 9.8 mm Hg was shown during single day clinic, single day home and three day home phasing respectively (p =<0.001). The range of IOP was lower in eyes with prior trabeculectomy (6.1 mm Hg vs 12.2 mm Hg). All patients undertook one reading in the early morning at home with an average of 4.8 readings during, and 3.1 readings after office hours. CONCLUSIONS: This small study shows that self-tonometry is feasible. The findings from home phasing demonstrated higher peak and trough IOPs, providing additional clinical information. Home phasing is a viable alternative. The cost-effectiveness of this approach has yet to be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8358569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83585692021-08-13 Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure McGarva, Emily Farr, Jane Dabasia, Priya Lawrenson, John G Murdoch, Ian E Eur J Ophthalmol Original Research Articles BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonometer. This study further explores Icare® HOME patient self-monitoring. METHODS: Patients were trained by standard protocol to use the Icare® HOME rebound tonometer. Patient self-tonometry was compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) over one clinical day. Following this, each patient was instructed to undertake further data collection that evening and over the subsequent two days. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35 eyes) participated. Good agreement was demonstrated between GAT and Icare® HOME for IOPs up to 15 mm Hg. Above this IOP the Icare® tended to over-read, largely explained by 2 patients with corneal thickness >600 um. The mean peak IOP during ‘clinic hours’ phasing was 16.7 mm Hg and 18.5 mm Hg (p = 0.24) over three days. An average range of 5.0, 7.0 and 9.8 mm Hg was shown during single day clinic, single day home and three day home phasing respectively (p =<0.001). The range of IOP was lower in eyes with prior trabeculectomy (6.1 mm Hg vs 12.2 mm Hg). All patients undertook one reading in the early morning at home with an average of 4.8 readings during, and 3.1 readings after office hours. CONCLUSIONS: This small study shows that self-tonometry is feasible. The findings from home phasing demonstrated higher peak and trough IOPs, providing additional clinical information. Home phasing is a viable alternative. The cost-effectiveness of this approach has yet to be addressed. SAGE Publications 2020-04-27 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8358569/ /pubmed/32340488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles McGarva, Emily Farr, Jane Dabasia, Priya Lawrenson, John G Murdoch, Ian E Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title | Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title_full | Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title_fullStr | Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title_short | Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
title_sort | initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcgarvaemily initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure AT farrjane initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure AT dabasiapriya initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure AT lawrensonjohng initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure AT murdochiane initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure |