Cargando…

Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonomet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGarva, Emily, Farr, Jane, Dabasia, Priya, Lawrenson, John G, Murdoch, Ian E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217
_version_ 1783737369834291200
author McGarva, Emily
Farr, Jane
Dabasia, Priya
Lawrenson, John G
Murdoch, Ian E
author_facet McGarva, Emily
Farr, Jane
Dabasia, Priya
Lawrenson, John G
Murdoch, Ian E
author_sort McGarva, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonometer. This study further explores Icare® HOME patient self-monitoring. METHODS: Patients were trained by standard protocol to use the Icare® HOME rebound tonometer. Patient self-tonometry was compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) over one clinical day. Following this, each patient was instructed to undertake further data collection that evening and over the subsequent two days. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35 eyes) participated. Good agreement was demonstrated between GAT and Icare® HOME for IOPs up to 15 mm Hg. Above this IOP the Icare® tended to over-read, largely explained by 2 patients with corneal thickness >600 um. The mean peak IOP during ‘clinic hours’ phasing was 16.7 mm Hg and 18.5 mm Hg (p = 0.24) over three days. An average range of 5.0, 7.0 and 9.8 mm Hg was shown during single day clinic, single day home and three day home phasing respectively (p =<0.001). The range of IOP was lower in eyes with prior trabeculectomy (6.1 mm Hg vs 12.2 mm Hg). All patients undertook one reading in the early morning at home with an average of 4.8 readings during, and 3.1 readings after office hours. CONCLUSIONS: This small study shows that self-tonometry is feasible. The findings from home phasing demonstrated higher peak and trough IOPs, providing additional clinical information. Home phasing is a viable alternative. The cost-effectiveness of this approach has yet to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83585692021-08-13 Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure McGarva, Emily Farr, Jane Dabasia, Priya Lawrenson, John G Murdoch, Ian E Eur J Ophthalmol Original Research Articles BACKGROUND/AIMS: Diurnal variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) is a routine assessment in glaucoma management. Providing patients the opportunity to perform self-tonometry might empower them and free hospital resource. We previously demonstrated that 74% of patients can use the Icare® HOME tonometer. This study further explores Icare® HOME patient self-monitoring. METHODS: Patients were trained by standard protocol to use the Icare® HOME rebound tonometer. Patient self-tonometry was compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) over one clinical day. Following this, each patient was instructed to undertake further data collection that evening and over the subsequent two days. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (35 eyes) participated. Good agreement was demonstrated between GAT and Icare® HOME for IOPs up to 15 mm Hg. Above this IOP the Icare® tended to over-read, largely explained by 2 patients with corneal thickness >600 um. The mean peak IOP during ‘clinic hours’ phasing was 16.7 mm Hg and 18.5 mm Hg (p = 0.24) over three days. An average range of 5.0, 7.0 and 9.8 mm Hg was shown during single day clinic, single day home and three day home phasing respectively (p =<0.001). The range of IOP was lower in eyes with prior trabeculectomy (6.1 mm Hg vs 12.2 mm Hg). All patients undertook one reading in the early morning at home with an average of 4.8 readings during, and 3.1 readings after office hours. CONCLUSIONS: This small study shows that self-tonometry is feasible. The findings from home phasing demonstrated higher peak and trough IOPs, providing additional clinical information. Home phasing is a viable alternative. The cost-effectiveness of this approach has yet to be addressed. SAGE Publications 2020-04-27 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8358569/ /pubmed/32340488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
McGarva, Emily
Farr, Jane
Dabasia, Priya
Lawrenson, John G
Murdoch, Ian E
Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title_full Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title_fullStr Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title_full_unstemmed Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title_short Initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
title_sort initial experience in self-monitoring of intraocular pressure
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1120672120920217
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgarvaemily initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure
AT farrjane initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure
AT dabasiapriya initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure
AT lawrensonjohng initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure
AT murdochiane initialexperienceinselfmonitoringofintraocularpressure