Cargando…
Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures
PURPOSE: There are primarily two techniques for affixing the scleral buckle (SB) to the sclera in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD): scleral tunnels or scleral sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study examined all patients with primary RRD who were treated with primary SB or SB...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394866 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9434 |
_version_ | 1783737405438689280 |
---|---|
author | Starr, Matthew R. Ryan, Edwin H. Obeid, Anthony Ryan, Claire Gao, Xinxiao Madhava, Malika L. Maloney, Sean M. Adika, Adam Z. Peddada, Krishi V. Sioufi, Kareem Patel, Luv G. Ammar, Michael J. Forbes, Nora J. Capone Jr., Antonio Emerson, Geoffrey G. Joseph, Daniel P. Eliott, Dean Regillo, Carl D. Hsu, Jason Gupta, Omesh P. Yonekawa, Yoshihiro Study Group, for the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) |
author_facet | Starr, Matthew R. Ryan, Edwin H. Obeid, Anthony Ryan, Claire Gao, Xinxiao Madhava, Malika L. Maloney, Sean M. Adika, Adam Z. Peddada, Krishi V. Sioufi, Kareem Patel, Luv G. Ammar, Michael J. Forbes, Nora J. Capone Jr., Antonio Emerson, Geoffrey G. Joseph, Daniel P. Eliott, Dean Regillo, Carl D. Hsu, Jason Gupta, Omesh P. Yonekawa, Yoshihiro Study Group, for the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) |
author_sort | Starr, Matthew R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There are primarily two techniques for affixing the scleral buckle (SB) to the sclera in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD): scleral tunnels or scleral sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study examined all patients with primary RRD who were treated with primary SB or SB combined with vitrectomy from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 across six sites. Two cohorts were examined: SB affixed using scleral sutures versus scleral tunnels. Pre- and postoperative variables were evaluated including visual acuity, anatomic success, and postoperative strabismus RESULTS: The mean preoperative logMAR VA for the belt loop cohort was 1.05 [Formula: see text] 1.06 (Snellen 20/224) and for the scleral suture cohort was 1.03 [Formula: see text] 1.04 (Snellen 20/214, p = 0.846). The respective mean postoperative logMAR VAs were 0.45 [Formula: see text] 0.55 (Snellen 20/56) and 0.46 [Formula: see text] 0.59 (Snellen 20/58, p = 0.574). The single surgery success rate for the tunnel cohort was 87.3% versus 88.6% for the suture cohort (p = 0.601). Three patients (1.0%) in the scleral tunnel cohort developed postoperative strabismus, but only one patient (0.1%) in the suture cohort (p = 0.04, multivariate p = 0.76). All cases of strabismus occurred in eyes that underwent SB combined with PPV (p = 0.02). There were no differences in vision, anatomic success, or strabismus between scleral tunnels versus scleral sutures in eyes that underwent primary SB. CONCLUSION: Scleral tunnels and scleral sutures had similar postoperative outcomes. Combined PPV/SB in eyes with scleral tunnels might be a risk for strabismus post retinal detachment surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8358744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83587442021-08-13 Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures Starr, Matthew R. Ryan, Edwin H. Obeid, Anthony Ryan, Claire Gao, Xinxiao Madhava, Malika L. Maloney, Sean M. Adika, Adam Z. Peddada, Krishi V. Sioufi, Kareem Patel, Luv G. Ammar, Michael J. Forbes, Nora J. Capone Jr., Antonio Emerson, Geoffrey G. Joseph, Daniel P. Eliott, Dean Regillo, Carl D. Hsu, Jason Gupta, Omesh P. Yonekawa, Yoshihiro Study Group, for the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: There are primarily two techniques for affixing the scleral buckle (SB) to the sclera in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD): scleral tunnels or scleral sutures. METHODS: This retrospective study examined all patients with primary RRD who were treated with primary SB or SB combined with vitrectomy from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 across six sites. Two cohorts were examined: SB affixed using scleral sutures versus scleral tunnels. Pre- and postoperative variables were evaluated including visual acuity, anatomic success, and postoperative strabismus RESULTS: The mean preoperative logMAR VA for the belt loop cohort was 1.05 [Formula: see text] 1.06 (Snellen 20/224) and for the scleral suture cohort was 1.03 [Formula: see text] 1.04 (Snellen 20/214, p = 0.846). The respective mean postoperative logMAR VAs were 0.45 [Formula: see text] 0.55 (Snellen 20/56) and 0.46 [Formula: see text] 0.59 (Snellen 20/58, p = 0.574). The single surgery success rate for the tunnel cohort was 87.3% versus 88.6% for the suture cohort (p = 0.601). Three patients (1.0%) in the scleral tunnel cohort developed postoperative strabismus, but only one patient (0.1%) in the suture cohort (p = 0.04, multivariate p = 0.76). All cases of strabismus occurred in eyes that underwent SB combined with PPV (p = 0.02). There were no differences in vision, anatomic success, or strabismus between scleral tunnels versus scleral sutures in eyes that underwent primary SB. CONCLUSION: Scleral tunnels and scleral sutures had similar postoperative outcomes. Combined PPV/SB in eyes with scleral tunnels might be a risk for strabismus post retinal detachment surgery. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8358744/ /pubmed/34394866 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9434 Text en Copyright © 2021 Starr et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Starr, Matthew R. Ryan, Edwin H. Obeid, Anthony Ryan, Claire Gao, Xinxiao Madhava, Malika L. Maloney, Sean M. Adika, Adam Z. Peddada, Krishi V. Sioufi, Kareem Patel, Luv G. Ammar, Michael J. Forbes, Nora J. Capone Jr., Antonio Emerson, Geoffrey G. Joseph, Daniel P. Eliott, Dean Regillo, Carl D. Hsu, Jason Gupta, Omesh P. Yonekawa, Yoshihiro Study Group, for the Primary Retinal Detachment Outcomes (PRO) Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title | Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title_full | Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title_fullStr | Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title_full_unstemmed | Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title_short | Scleral Buckling for Primary Retinal Detachment: Outcomes of Scleral Tunnels versus Scleral Sutures |
title_sort | scleral buckling for primary retinal detachment: outcomes of scleral tunnels versus scleral sutures |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394866 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT starrmatthewr scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT ryanedwinh scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT obeidanthony scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT ryanclaire scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT gaoxinxiao scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT madhavamalikal scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT maloneyseanm scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT adikaadamz scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT peddadakrishiv scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT sioufikareem scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT patelluvg scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT ammarmichaelj scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT forbesnoraj scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT caponejrantonio scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT emersongeoffreyg scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT josephdanielp scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT eliottdean scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT regillocarld scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT hsujason scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT guptaomeshp scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT yonekawayoshihiro scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures AT studygroupfortheprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomespro scleralbucklingforprimaryretinaldetachmentoutcomesofscleraltunnelsversusscleralsutures |