Cargando…
Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment
PURPOSE: To study the success rate of LASER as a primary modality of treatment in aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) cases. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of 56 eyes of 28 preterm babies (males = 21) with APROP who underwent laser therapy. Babies were divided into gr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394869 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9437 |
_version_ | 1783737410112192512 |
---|---|
author | Narnaware, Shilpi H Bawankule, Prashant K Raje, Dhananjay |
author_facet | Narnaware, Shilpi H Bawankule, Prashant K Raje, Dhananjay |
author_sort | Narnaware, Shilpi H |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To study the success rate of LASER as a primary modality of treatment in aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) cases. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of 56 eyes of 28 preterm babies (males = 21) with APROP who underwent laser therapy. Babies were divided into groups on the basis of gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), and postmenstrual age (PMA) at which treatment was performed. GA (in weeks): [Formula: see text] 28 (n = 7), 28–30 (n = 11), [Formula: see text] 30 (n = 10). BW (in grams): [Formula: see text] 1000 (n = 8), 1000–1200 (n = 10), [Formula: see text] 1200 (n = 10). PMA (in weeks): [Formula: see text] 32 (n = 6), 32–34 (n = 18), [Formula: see text] 34 (n = 4). Success was calculated as complete regression of disease without need for any other modality of treatment such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pars plana vitrectomy. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 94.64% (53/56). Two babies who needed additional modality of treatment were [Formula: see text] 28 weeks of GA (one eye) and 28–30 weeks (two eyes). One baby (one eye) was [Formula: see text] 1000 gm and the other (two eyes) was [Formula: see text] 1200 gm, while PMA at which additional treatment was needed was 30 weeks in one baby (one eye) and 33 weeks in the other (two eyes). CONCLUSION: In this era of anti-VEGF treatment, even in cases of APROP, LASER should still be considered as a primary modality of treatment, as it is a one-time treatment without the concern of systemic side effects and recurrent/persistent avascular zones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8358764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83587642021-08-13 Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment Narnaware, Shilpi H Bawankule, Prashant K Raje, Dhananjay J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To study the success rate of LASER as a primary modality of treatment in aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (APROP) cases. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of 56 eyes of 28 preterm babies (males = 21) with APROP who underwent laser therapy. Babies were divided into groups on the basis of gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), and postmenstrual age (PMA) at which treatment was performed. GA (in weeks): [Formula: see text] 28 (n = 7), 28–30 (n = 11), [Formula: see text] 30 (n = 10). BW (in grams): [Formula: see text] 1000 (n = 8), 1000–1200 (n = 10), [Formula: see text] 1200 (n = 10). PMA (in weeks): [Formula: see text] 32 (n = 6), 32–34 (n = 18), [Formula: see text] 34 (n = 4). Success was calculated as complete regression of disease without need for any other modality of treatment such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) or pars plana vitrectomy. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 94.64% (53/56). Two babies who needed additional modality of treatment were [Formula: see text] 28 weeks of GA (one eye) and 28–30 weeks (two eyes). One baby (one eye) was [Formula: see text] 1000 gm and the other (two eyes) was [Formula: see text] 1200 gm, while PMA at which additional treatment was needed was 30 weeks in one baby (one eye) and 33 weeks in the other (two eyes). CONCLUSION: In this era of anti-VEGF treatment, even in cases of APROP, LASER should still be considered as a primary modality of treatment, as it is a one-time treatment without the concern of systemic side effects and recurrent/persistent avascular zones. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8358764/ /pubmed/34394869 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9437 Text en Copyright © 2021 Narnaware et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Narnaware, Shilpi H Bawankule, Prashant K Raje, Dhananjay Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title | Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title_full | Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title_fullStr | Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title_short | Aggressive Posterior Retinopathy of Prematurity (APROP): LASER as the Primary Modality of Treatment |
title_sort | aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (aprop): laser as the primary modality of treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394869 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narnawareshilpih aggressiveposteriorretinopathyofprematurityaproplaserastheprimarymodalityoftreatment AT bawankuleprashantk aggressiveposteriorretinopathyofprematurityaproplaserastheprimarymodalityoftreatment AT rajedhananjay aggressiveposteriorretinopathyofprematurityaproplaserastheprimarymodalityoftreatment |