Cargando…

Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection

PURPOSE: To estimate the carbon footprint of a single intravitreal injection in a hospital-based intravitreal service. METHODS: Greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the delivery of an intravitreal injection were calculated using a hybrid lifecycle analysis technique. Data were collected regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Power, Barry, Brady, Robert, Connell, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394865
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9433
_version_ 1783737410337636352
author Power, Barry
Brady, Robert
Connell, Paul
author_facet Power, Barry
Brady, Robert
Connell, Paul
author_sort Power, Barry
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To estimate the carbon footprint of a single intravitreal injection in a hospital-based intravitreal service. METHODS: Greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the delivery of an intravitreal injection were calculated using a hybrid lifecycle analysis technique. Data were collected regarding procurement of materials, patient travel, and building energy use. RESULTS: Carbon emissions associated with a single intravitreal injection, excluding the anti-VEGF agent, were 13.68 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq. This equates to 82,100 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq annually for our service. Patient travel accounted for the majority of emissions at 77%, with procurement accounting 19% for and building energy usage for 4% of total emissions. The omission of items considered dispensable from injection packs would reduce carbon emissions by an estimated 0.56 kg per injection – an annual saving of 3,360 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq for our service. Similar savings, if extrapolated to a country the size of the United Kingdom, could yield annual carbon savings of 450,000 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq. For context, a single one-way economy transatlantic flight produces 480 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq per person. CONCLUSION: Wasteful practice in healthcare increases greenhouse gas production and drives climate change. The healthcare sector should be a leader in sustainable practice promotion and changes to high volume procedures have the largest impact on emissions. Long-acting agents offer the greatest future potential for meaningful reductions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83587652021-08-13 Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection Power, Barry Brady, Robert Connell, Paul J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To estimate the carbon footprint of a single intravitreal injection in a hospital-based intravitreal service. METHODS: Greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the delivery of an intravitreal injection were calculated using a hybrid lifecycle analysis technique. Data were collected regarding procurement of materials, patient travel, and building energy use. RESULTS: Carbon emissions associated with a single intravitreal injection, excluding the anti-VEGF agent, were 13.68 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq. This equates to 82,100 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq annually for our service. Patient travel accounted for the majority of emissions at 77%, with procurement accounting 19% for and building energy usage for 4% of total emissions. The omission of items considered dispensable from injection packs would reduce carbon emissions by an estimated 0.56 kg per injection – an annual saving of 3,360 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq for our service. Similar savings, if extrapolated to a country the size of the United Kingdom, could yield annual carbon savings of 450,000 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq. For context, a single one-way economy transatlantic flight produces 480 kg CO [Formula: see text] eq per person. CONCLUSION: Wasteful practice in healthcare increases greenhouse gas production and drives climate change. The healthcare sector should be a leader in sustainable practice promotion and changes to high volume procedures have the largest impact on emissions. Long-acting agents offer the greatest future potential for meaningful reductions. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8358765/ /pubmed/34394865 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9433 Text en Copyright © 2021 Power et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Power, Barry
Brady, Robert
Connell, Paul
Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title_full Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title_fullStr Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title_short Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of an Intravitreal Injection
title_sort analyzing the carbon footprint of an intravitreal injection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394865
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9433
work_keys_str_mv AT powerbarry analyzingthecarbonfootprintofanintravitrealinjection
AT bradyrobert analyzingthecarbonfootprintofanintravitrealinjection
AT connellpaul analyzingthecarbonfootprintofanintravitrealinjection