Cargando…

Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples

Legionella infections have steadily increased in the United States over the last 20 years, and most of these infections have been attributed to contaminated water. The gold standard for confirmation of Legionella presence in water is culturing with Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract (BCYE) agar. Follow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boczek, Laura A., Tang, Min, Formal, Casey, Lytle, Darren, Ryu, Hodon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34152299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wh.2021.051
_version_ 1783737414306496512
author Boczek, Laura A.
Tang, Min
Formal, Casey
Lytle, Darren
Ryu, Hodon
author_facet Boczek, Laura A.
Tang, Min
Formal, Casey
Lytle, Darren
Ryu, Hodon
author_sort Boczek, Laura A.
collection PubMed
description Legionella infections have steadily increased in the United States over the last 20 years, and most of these infections have been attributed to contaminated water. The gold standard for confirmation of Legionella presence in water is culturing with Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract (BCYE) agar. Following many modifications, this method is still time-consuming, expensive, and can take longer than 10 days for full confirmation. The Legiolert is a newer and simpler culture product that is claimed to be able to quantify Legionella pneumophila in 7 days with high sensitivity and specificity and does not need further confirmation for the presence of L. pneumophila. This study compared the culturability of L. pneumophila occurring in a simulated home plumbing system using both Legiolert and BCYE agar methods. Out of 185 water samples, Legiolert and BCYE method detected L. pneumophila in 83 and 85% of the samples, respectively. The two methods were determined to be statistically equivalent for culturability of L. pneumophila, though the detected levels by Legiolert were slightly higher than the BCYE method. The molecular confirmation of positive (n = 254) and negative wells (n = 82) with Legiolert also showed a high specificity of 96.5% (i.e., 3.5% false positives (9/254) and 0% false negatives (0/82)).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83587842022-06-01 Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples Boczek, Laura A. Tang, Min Formal, Casey Lytle, Darren Ryu, Hodon J Water Health Article Legionella infections have steadily increased in the United States over the last 20 years, and most of these infections have been attributed to contaminated water. The gold standard for confirmation of Legionella presence in water is culturing with Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract (BCYE) agar. Following many modifications, this method is still time-consuming, expensive, and can take longer than 10 days for full confirmation. The Legiolert is a newer and simpler culture product that is claimed to be able to quantify Legionella pneumophila in 7 days with high sensitivity and specificity and does not need further confirmation for the presence of L. pneumophila. This study compared the culturability of L. pneumophila occurring in a simulated home plumbing system using both Legiolert and BCYE agar methods. Out of 185 water samples, Legiolert and BCYE method detected L. pneumophila in 83 and 85% of the samples, respectively. The two methods were determined to be statistically equivalent for culturability of L. pneumophila, though the detected levels by Legiolert were slightly higher than the BCYE method. The molecular confirmation of positive (n = 254) and negative wells (n = 82) with Legiolert also showed a high specificity of 96.5% (i.e., 3.5% false positives (9/254) and 0% false negatives (0/82)). 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8358784/ /pubmed/34152299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wh.2021.051 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Boczek, Laura A.
Tang, Min
Formal, Casey
Lytle, Darren
Ryu, Hodon
Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title_full Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title_fullStr Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title_short Comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of Legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
title_sort comparison of two culture methods for the enumeration of legionella pneumophila from potable water samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34152299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wh.2021.051
work_keys_str_mv AT boczeklauraa comparisonoftwoculturemethodsfortheenumerationoflegionellapneumophilafrompotablewatersamples
AT tangmin comparisonoftwoculturemethodsfortheenumerationoflegionellapneumophilafrompotablewatersamples
AT formalcasey comparisonoftwoculturemethodsfortheenumerationoflegionellapneumophilafrompotablewatersamples
AT lytledarren comparisonoftwoculturemethodsfortheenumerationoflegionellapneumophilafrompotablewatersamples
AT ryuhodon comparisonoftwoculturemethodsfortheenumerationoflegionellapneumophilafrompotablewatersamples