Cargando…

Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat

The protective effect of the efferent system against acoustic trauma (AT) has been shown by several experimental approaches, including damage to one ear, sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) in the floor of the IV ventricle, and knock-in mice overexpressing outer hair cell (OHC) cholinergic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díaz, Iván, Colmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia, Pérez-González, David, Carmona, Venezia G., Plaza Lopez, Ignacio, Merchán, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
_version_ 1783737417124020224
author Díaz, Iván
Colmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia
Pérez-González, David
Carmona, Venezia G.
Plaza Lopez, Ignacio
Merchán, Miguel A.
author_facet Díaz, Iván
Colmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia
Pérez-González, David
Carmona, Venezia G.
Plaza Lopez, Ignacio
Merchán, Miguel A.
author_sort Díaz, Iván
collection PubMed
description The protective effect of the efferent system against acoustic trauma (AT) has been shown by several experimental approaches, including damage to one ear, sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) in the floor of the IV ventricle, and knock-in mice overexpressing outer hair cell (OHC) cholinergic receptors, among others. Such effects have been related to changes in the regulation of the cholinergic efferent system and in cochlear amplification, which ultimately reverse upon protective hearing suppression. In addition to well-known circuits of the brainstem, the descending corticofugal pathway also regulates efferent neurons of the olivary complex. In this study, we applied our recently developed experimental paradigm of multiple sessions of electrical stimulation (ES) to activate the efferent system in combination with noise overstimulation. ABR thresholds increased 1 and 2 days after AT (8–16 kHz bandpass noise at 107 dB for 90 min) recovering at AT + 14 days. However, after multiple sessions of epidural anodal stimulation, no changes in thresholds were observed following AT. Although an inflammatory response was also observed 1 day after AT in both groups, the counts of reactive macrophages in both experimental conditions suggest decreased inflammation in the epidural stimulation group. Quantitative immunocytochemistry for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) showed a significant decrease in the size and optical density of the efferent terminals 1 day after AT and a rebound at 14 days, suggesting depletion of the terminals followed by a long-term compensatory response. Such a synthesis recovery was significantly higher upon cortical stimulation. No significant correlation was found between ChAT optical density and size of the buttons in sham controls (SC) and ES/AT + 1day animals; however, significant negative correlations were shown in all other experimental conditions. Therefore, our comparative analysis suggests that cochleotopic cholinergic neurotransmission is also better preserved after multisession epidural stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8358804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83588042021-08-13 Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat Díaz, Iván Colmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia Pérez-González, David Carmona, Venezia G. Plaza Lopez, Ignacio Merchán, Miguel A. Front Neurosci Neuroscience The protective effect of the efferent system against acoustic trauma (AT) has been shown by several experimental approaches, including damage to one ear, sectioning of the olivocochlear bundle (OCB) in the floor of the IV ventricle, and knock-in mice overexpressing outer hair cell (OHC) cholinergic receptors, among others. Such effects have been related to changes in the regulation of the cholinergic efferent system and in cochlear amplification, which ultimately reverse upon protective hearing suppression. In addition to well-known circuits of the brainstem, the descending corticofugal pathway also regulates efferent neurons of the olivary complex. In this study, we applied our recently developed experimental paradigm of multiple sessions of electrical stimulation (ES) to activate the efferent system in combination with noise overstimulation. ABR thresholds increased 1 and 2 days after AT (8–16 kHz bandpass noise at 107 dB for 90 min) recovering at AT + 14 days. However, after multiple sessions of epidural anodal stimulation, no changes in thresholds were observed following AT. Although an inflammatory response was also observed 1 day after AT in both groups, the counts of reactive macrophages in both experimental conditions suggest decreased inflammation in the epidural stimulation group. Quantitative immunocytochemistry for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) showed a significant decrease in the size and optical density of the efferent terminals 1 day after AT and a rebound at 14 days, suggesting depletion of the terminals followed by a long-term compensatory response. Such a synthesis recovery was significantly higher upon cortical stimulation. No significant correlation was found between ChAT optical density and size of the buttons in sham controls (SC) and ES/AT + 1day animals; however, significant negative correlations were shown in all other experimental conditions. Therefore, our comparative analysis suggests that cochleotopic cholinergic neurotransmission is also better preserved after multisession epidural stimulation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8358804/ /pubmed/34393701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047 Text en Copyright © 2021 Díaz, Colmenárez-Raga, Pérez-González, Carmona, Plaza Lopez and Merchán. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Díaz, Iván
Colmenárez-Raga, Ana Cecilia
Pérez-González, David
Carmona, Venezia G.
Plaza Lopez, Ignacio
Merchán, Miguel A.
Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title_full Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title_fullStr Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title_short Effects of Multisession Anodal Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Cortex on Temporary Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in the Rat
title_sort effects of multisession anodal electrical stimulation of the auditory cortex on temporary noise-induced hearing loss in the rat
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8358804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34393701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.642047
work_keys_str_mv AT diazivan effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat
AT colmenarezragaanacecilia effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat
AT perezgonzalezdavid effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat
AT carmonaveneziag effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat
AT plazalopezignacio effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat
AT merchanmiguela effectsofmultisessionanodalelectricalstimulationoftheauditorycortexontemporarynoiseinducedhearinglossintherat