Cargando…

Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized Pair Coupled Cluster

[Image: see text] The pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) method (where the excitation manifold is restricted to electron pairs) has a series of interesting features. Among others, it provides ground-state energies very close to what is obtained with doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kossoski, Fábris, Marie, Antoine, Scemama, Anthony, Caffarel, Michel, Loos, Pierre-François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00348
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] The pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) method (where the excitation manifold is restricted to electron pairs) has a series of interesting features. Among others, it provides ground-state energies very close to what is obtained with doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI), but with a polynomial cost (compared with the exponential cost of the latter). Here, we address whether this similarity holds for excited states by exploring the symmetric dissociation of the linear H(4) molecule. When ground-state Hartree–Fock (HF) orbitals are employed, pCCD and DOCI excited-state energies do not match, a feature that is assigned to the poor HF reference. In contrast, by optimizing the orbitals at the pCCD level (oo-pCCD) specifically for each excited state, the discrepancies between pCCD and DOCI decrease by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude. Therefore, the pCCD and DOCI methodologies still provide comparable energies for excited states, but only if suitable, state-specific orbitals are adopted. We also assessed whether a pCCD approach could be used to directly target doubly excited states, without having to resort to the equation-of-motion (EOM) formalism. In our Δoo-pCCD model, excitation energies are extracted from the energy difference between separate oo-pCCD calculations for the ground state and the targeted excited state. For a set comprising the doubly excited states of CH(+), BH, nitroxyl, nitrosomethane, and formaldehyde, we found that Δoo-pCCD provides quite accurate excitation energies, with root-mean-square deviations (with respect to full configuration interaction results) lower than those of CC3 and comparable to those of EOM-CCSDT, two methods with a much higher computational cost.