Cargando…
Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized Pair Coupled Cluster
[Image: see text] The pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) method (where the excitation manifold is restricted to electron pairs) has a series of interesting features. Among others, it provides ground-state energies very close to what is obtained with doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI),...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00348 |
_version_ | 1783737456157261824 |
---|---|
author | Kossoski, Fábris Marie, Antoine Scemama, Anthony Caffarel, Michel Loos, Pierre-François |
author_facet | Kossoski, Fábris Marie, Antoine Scemama, Anthony Caffarel, Michel Loos, Pierre-François |
author_sort | Kossoski, Fábris |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) method (where the excitation manifold is restricted to electron pairs) has a series of interesting features. Among others, it provides ground-state energies very close to what is obtained with doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI), but with a polynomial cost (compared with the exponential cost of the latter). Here, we address whether this similarity holds for excited states by exploring the symmetric dissociation of the linear H(4) molecule. When ground-state Hartree–Fock (HF) orbitals are employed, pCCD and DOCI excited-state energies do not match, a feature that is assigned to the poor HF reference. In contrast, by optimizing the orbitals at the pCCD level (oo-pCCD) specifically for each excited state, the discrepancies between pCCD and DOCI decrease by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude. Therefore, the pCCD and DOCI methodologies still provide comparable energies for excited states, but only if suitable, state-specific orbitals are adopted. We also assessed whether a pCCD approach could be used to directly target doubly excited states, without having to resort to the equation-of-motion (EOM) formalism. In our Δoo-pCCD model, excitation energies are extracted from the energy difference between separate oo-pCCD calculations for the ground state and the targeted excited state. For a set comprising the doubly excited states of CH(+), BH, nitroxyl, nitrosomethane, and formaldehyde, we found that Δoo-pCCD provides quite accurate excitation energies, with root-mean-square deviations (with respect to full configuration interaction results) lower than those of CC3 and comparable to those of EOM-CCSDT, two methods with a much higher computational cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8359009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83590092021-08-13 Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized Pair Coupled Cluster Kossoski, Fábris Marie, Antoine Scemama, Anthony Caffarel, Michel Loos, Pierre-François J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The pair coupled cluster doubles (pCCD) method (where the excitation manifold is restricted to electron pairs) has a series of interesting features. Among others, it provides ground-state energies very close to what is obtained with doubly occupied configuration interaction (DOCI), but with a polynomial cost (compared with the exponential cost of the latter). Here, we address whether this similarity holds for excited states by exploring the symmetric dissociation of the linear H(4) molecule. When ground-state Hartree–Fock (HF) orbitals are employed, pCCD and DOCI excited-state energies do not match, a feature that is assigned to the poor HF reference. In contrast, by optimizing the orbitals at the pCCD level (oo-pCCD) specifically for each excited state, the discrepancies between pCCD and DOCI decrease by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude. Therefore, the pCCD and DOCI methodologies still provide comparable energies for excited states, but only if suitable, state-specific orbitals are adopted. We also assessed whether a pCCD approach could be used to directly target doubly excited states, without having to resort to the equation-of-motion (EOM) formalism. In our Δoo-pCCD model, excitation energies are extracted from the energy difference between separate oo-pCCD calculations for the ground state and the targeted excited state. For a set comprising the doubly excited states of CH(+), BH, nitroxyl, nitrosomethane, and formaldehyde, we found that Δoo-pCCD provides quite accurate excitation energies, with root-mean-square deviations (with respect to full configuration interaction results) lower than those of CC3 and comparable to those of EOM-CCSDT, two methods with a much higher computational cost. American Chemical Society 2021-07-26 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8359009/ /pubmed/34310140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00348 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Kossoski, Fábris Marie, Antoine Scemama, Anthony Caffarel, Michel Loos, Pierre-François Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized Pair Coupled Cluster |
title | Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized
Pair Coupled Cluster |
title_full | Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized
Pair Coupled Cluster |
title_fullStr | Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized
Pair Coupled Cluster |
title_full_unstemmed | Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized
Pair Coupled Cluster |
title_short | Excited States from State-Specific Orbital-Optimized
Pair Coupled Cluster |
title_sort | excited states from state-specific orbital-optimized
pair coupled cluster |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kossoskifabris excitedstatesfromstatespecificorbitaloptimizedpaircoupledcluster AT marieantoine excitedstatesfromstatespecificorbitaloptimizedpaircoupledcluster AT scemamaanthony excitedstatesfromstatespecificorbitaloptimizedpaircoupledcluster AT caffarelmichel excitedstatesfromstatespecificorbitaloptimizedpaircoupledcluster AT loospierrefrancois excitedstatesfromstatespecificorbitaloptimizedpaircoupledcluster |