Cargando…

GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective

[Image: see text] We calculate complete basis set (CBS) limit-extrapolated ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EA) with Slater-type basis sets for the molecules in the GW100 database. To this end, we present two new Slater-type orbital (STO) basis sets of triple-(TZ) and quadruple-ζ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Förster, Arno, Visscher, Lucas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00308
_version_ 1783737456870293504
author Förster, Arno
Visscher, Lucas
author_facet Förster, Arno
Visscher, Lucas
author_sort Förster, Arno
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We calculate complete basis set (CBS) limit-extrapolated ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EA) with Slater-type basis sets for the molecules in the GW100 database. To this end, we present two new Slater-type orbital (STO) basis sets of triple-(TZ) and quadruple-ζ (QZ) quality, whose polarization is adequate for correlated-electron methods and which contain extra diffuse functions to be able to correctly calculate EAs of molecules with a positive lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). We demonstrate that going from TZ to QZ quality consistently reduces the basis set error of our computed IPs and EAs, and we conclude that a good estimate of these quantities at the CBS limit can be obtained by extrapolation. With mean absolute deviations (MAD) from 70 to 85 meV, our CBS limit-extrapolated IP are in good agreement with results from FHI-AIMS, TURBOMOLE, VASP, and WEST, while they differ by more than 130 meV on average from nanoGW. With a MAD of 160 meV, our EA are also in good agreement with the WEST code. Especially for systems with positive LUMOs, the agreement is excellent. With respect to other codes, the STO-type basis sets generally underestimate EAs of small molecules with strongly bound LUMOs. With 62 meV for IPs and 93 meV for EAs, we find much better agreement with CBS limit-extrapolated results from FHI-AIMS for a set of 250 medium to large organic molecules.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83590122021-08-13 GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective Förster, Arno Visscher, Lucas J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] We calculate complete basis set (CBS) limit-extrapolated ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EA) with Slater-type basis sets for the molecules in the GW100 database. To this end, we present two new Slater-type orbital (STO) basis sets of triple-(TZ) and quadruple-ζ (QZ) quality, whose polarization is adequate for correlated-electron methods and which contain extra diffuse functions to be able to correctly calculate EAs of molecules with a positive lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). We demonstrate that going from TZ to QZ quality consistently reduces the basis set error of our computed IPs and EAs, and we conclude that a good estimate of these quantities at the CBS limit can be obtained by extrapolation. With mean absolute deviations (MAD) from 70 to 85 meV, our CBS limit-extrapolated IP are in good agreement with results from FHI-AIMS, TURBOMOLE, VASP, and WEST, while they differ by more than 130 meV on average from nanoGW. With a MAD of 160 meV, our EA are also in good agreement with the WEST code. Especially for systems with positive LUMOs, the agreement is excellent. With respect to other codes, the STO-type basis sets generally underestimate EAs of small molecules with strongly bound LUMOs. With 62 meV for IPs and 93 meV for EAs, we find much better agreement with CBS limit-extrapolated results from FHI-AIMS for a set of 250 medium to large organic molecules. American Chemical Society 2021-07-08 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8359012/ /pubmed/34236172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00308 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Förster, Arno
Visscher, Lucas
GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title_full GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title_fullStr GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title_full_unstemmed GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title_short GW100: A Slater-Type Orbital Perspective
title_sort gw100: a slater-type orbital perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34236172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00308
work_keys_str_mv AT forsterarno gw100aslatertypeorbitalperspective
AT visscherlucas gw100aslatertypeorbitalperspective