Cargando…

Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jouffroy, Romain, Vivien, Benoît
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34384479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0
_version_ 1783737476918018048
author Jouffroy, Romain
Vivien, Benoît
author_facet Jouffroy, Romain
Vivien, Benoît
author_sort Jouffroy, Romain
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83591162021-08-16 Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity Jouffroy, Romain Vivien, Benoît Crit Care Letter BioMed Central 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8359116/ /pubmed/34384479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Letter
Jouffroy, Romain
Vivien, Benoît
Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_full Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_fullStr Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_short Comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
title_sort comparison of culture‑negative and culture‑positive sepsis or septic shock: outcomes are more influenced by the nature of the infectious agent itself than by the samples’ positivity
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34384479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03651-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jouffroyromain comparisonofculturenegativeandculturepositivesepsisorsepticshockoutcomesaremoreinfluencedbythenatureoftheinfectiousagentitselfthanbythesamplespositivity
AT vivienbenoit comparisonofculturenegativeandculturepositivesepsisorsepticshockoutcomesaremoreinfluencedbythenatureoftheinfectiousagentitselfthanbythesamplespositivity