Cargando…

Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study

OBJECTIVE: Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) creates clinically relevant sub‐groups for monitoring caesarean birth rates. This study assesses whether this classification can be derived from routine data in Europe and uses it to analyse national caesarean rates. DESIGN: Observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeitlin, J, Durox, M, Macfarlane, A, Alexander, S, Heller, G, Loghi, M, Nijhuis, J, Sól Ólafsdóttir, H, Mierzejewska, E, Gissler, M, Blondel, B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16634
_version_ 1783737486965473280
author Zeitlin, J
Durox, M
Macfarlane, A
Alexander, S
Heller, G
Loghi, M
Nijhuis, J
Sól Ólafsdóttir, H
Mierzejewska, E
Gissler, M
Blondel, B
author_facet Zeitlin, J
Durox, M
Macfarlane, A
Alexander, S
Heller, G
Loghi, M
Nijhuis, J
Sól Ólafsdóttir, H
Mierzejewska, E
Gissler, M
Blondel, B
author_sort Zeitlin, J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) creates clinically relevant sub‐groups for monitoring caesarean birth rates. This study assesses whether this classification can be derived from routine data in Europe and uses it to analyse national caesarean rates. DESIGN: Observational study using routine data. SETTING: Twenty‐seven EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. POPULATION: All births at ≥22 weeks of gestational age in 2015. METHODS: National statistical offices and medical birth registers derived numbers of caesarean births in TGCS groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall caesarean rate, prevalence and caesarean rates in each of the TGCS groups. RESULTS: Of 31 countries, 18 were able to provide data on the TGCS groups, with UK data available only from Northern Ireland. Caesarean birth rates ranged from 16.1 to 56.9%. Countries providing TGCS data had lower caesarean rates than countries without data (25.8% versus 32.9%, P = 0.04). Countries with higher caesarean rates tended to have higher rates in all TGCS groups. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, however, especially for groups 5 (previous caesarean section), 6, 7 (nulliparous/multiparous breech) and 10 (singleton cephalic preterm). The differences in percentages of abnormal lies, group 9, illustrate potential misclassification arising from unstandardised definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation of data quality is needed, using TGCS in Europe provides valuable comparator and baseline data for benchmarking and surveillance. Higher caesarean rates in countries unable to construct the TGCS suggest that effective routine information systems may be an indicator of a country's investment in implementing evidence‐based caesarean policies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Many European countries can provide Robson's Ten‐Group Classification to improve caesarean rate comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83591612021-08-17 Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study Zeitlin, J Durox, M Macfarlane, A Alexander, S Heller, G Loghi, M Nijhuis, J Sól Ólafsdóttir, H Mierzejewska, E Gissler, M Blondel, B BJOG Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Robson's Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) creates clinically relevant sub‐groups for monitoring caesarean birth rates. This study assesses whether this classification can be derived from routine data in Europe and uses it to analyse national caesarean rates. DESIGN: Observational study using routine data. SETTING: Twenty‐seven EU member states plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the UK. POPULATION: All births at ≥22 weeks of gestational age in 2015. METHODS: National statistical offices and medical birth registers derived numbers of caesarean births in TGCS groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall caesarean rate, prevalence and caesarean rates in each of the TGCS groups. RESULTS: Of 31 countries, 18 were able to provide data on the TGCS groups, with UK data available only from Northern Ireland. Caesarean birth rates ranged from 16.1 to 56.9%. Countries providing TGCS data had lower caesarean rates than countries without data (25.8% versus 32.9%, P = 0.04). Countries with higher caesarean rates tended to have higher rates in all TGCS groups. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, however, especially for groups 5 (previous caesarean section), 6, 7 (nulliparous/multiparous breech) and 10 (singleton cephalic preterm). The differences in percentages of abnormal lies, group 9, illustrate potential misclassification arising from unstandardised definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation of data quality is needed, using TGCS in Europe provides valuable comparator and baseline data for benchmarking and surveillance. Higher caesarean rates in countries unable to construct the TGCS suggest that effective routine information systems may be an indicator of a country's investment in implementing evidence‐based caesarean policies. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Many European countries can provide Robson's Ten‐Group Classification to improve caesarean rate comparisons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-01 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8359161/ /pubmed/33338307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16634 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zeitlin, J
Durox, M
Macfarlane, A
Alexander, S
Heller, G
Loghi, M
Nijhuis, J
Sól Ólafsdóttir, H
Mierzejewska, E
Gissler, M
Blondel, B
Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title_full Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title_fullStr Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title_full_unstemmed Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title_short Using Robson's Ten‐Group Classification System for comparing caesarean section rates in Europe: an analysis of routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study
title_sort using robson's ten‐group classification system for comparing caesarean section rates in europe: an analysis of routine data from the euro‐peristat study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33338307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16634
work_keys_str_mv AT zeitlinj usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT duroxm usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT macfarlanea usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT alexanders usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT hellerg usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT loghim usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT nijhuisj usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT sololafsdottirh usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT mierzejewskae usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT gisslerm usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT blondelb usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy
AT usingrobsonstengroupclassificationsystemforcomparingcaesareansectionratesineuropeananalysisofroutinedatafromtheeuroperistatstudy