Cargando…

Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?

Deteriorating soil health, diminishing soil organic carbon (SOC), development of subsurface hard compact layer and declining system productivity are barriers to achieving sustainable production in the traditional rice–wheat cropping system (TA) in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain of India. Conservati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mondal, Surajit, Mishra, Janki Sharan, Poonia, Shish Pal, Kumar, Rakesh, Dubey, Rachana, Kumar, Santosh, Verma, Mausam, Rao, Karnena K., Ahmed, Akram, Dwivedi, Sharad, Bhatt, Bhagwati Prasad, Malik, Ram Kanwar, Kumar, Virender, McDonald, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13092
_version_ 1783737489273389056
author Mondal, Surajit
Mishra, Janki Sharan
Poonia, Shish Pal
Kumar, Rakesh
Dubey, Rachana
Kumar, Santosh
Verma, Mausam
Rao, Karnena K.
Ahmed, Akram
Dwivedi, Sharad
Bhatt, Bhagwati Prasad
Malik, Ram Kanwar
Kumar, Virender
McDonald, Andrew
author_facet Mondal, Surajit
Mishra, Janki Sharan
Poonia, Shish Pal
Kumar, Rakesh
Dubey, Rachana
Kumar, Santosh
Verma, Mausam
Rao, Karnena K.
Ahmed, Akram
Dwivedi, Sharad
Bhatt, Bhagwati Prasad
Malik, Ram Kanwar
Kumar, Virender
McDonald, Andrew
author_sort Mondal, Surajit
collection PubMed
description Deteriorating soil health, diminishing soil organic carbon (SOC), development of subsurface hard compact layer and declining system productivity are barriers to achieving sustainable production in the traditional rice–wheat cropping system (TA) in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain of India. Conservation agriculture (CA), which favours minimum soil disturbance, crop residue retention and crop diversification could be a viable alternative to the TA to address most of those major problems. With that in mind, a long‐term experiment is being implemented at ICAR‐RCER, Patna, Bihar, India, with four treatments: (a) TA, (b) full CA (fCA) and (c and d) partial CA (pCA1 and pCA2), differing in crop establishment methods, cropping system and crop residue management in a randomized complete block design. Measurement of soil health parameters was carried out in the 11th year of the experiment. The results revealed a beneficial effect of CA and 46 and 40% increase in SOC concentration and stock, respectively, under fCA over TA in the 0–7.5‐cm soil layer. The effect of partial CA (pCA1 and pCA2) was variable, but an increasing trend was always observed under pCA compared to TA. There was an enrichment in SOC content of aggregates under CA irrespective of size class; however, no relation was found between SOC content and aggregate diameter. The contribution of macroaggregates to SOC stock was larger (36–66%) under CA in the 0–7.5‐cm soil layer. Adoption of CA improved the macroaggregate content, MWD and GMD of aggregates, and aggregation ratio. Soil macropore content was greater under fCA, whereas other parameters were similar among treatments. The impact of CA was mostly limited to 0–7.5 cm soil layer and a maximum up to 15 cm soil depth while evaluation until 60 cm soil depth was realized. The yield of rice in CA was comparable to or higher than in TA, whereas the system rice equivalent yield was always higher (38–53%) under CA than under the conventional practices. Therefore, a CA‐based cropping system must be encouraged, to increase SOC status, improve aggregation stability and, consequently, sustain or increase system productivity, in order to achieve food and nutritional security in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain of India. HIGHLIGHTS: Effects of long‐term conservation agriculture (CA) on soil C, aggregation and yield were evaluated. CA improved SOC concentration and stock by 46 and 40%, as well as macroaggregate SOC stock by 36–66%. Macro‐aggregation and mean weight diameter improved in CA but was mostly limited to a shallow soil depth. CA can be promoted for sustainability of a rice–wheat system due to higher productivity (38–53%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83591712021-08-17 Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India? Mondal, Surajit Mishra, Janki Sharan Poonia, Shish Pal Kumar, Rakesh Dubey, Rachana Kumar, Santosh Verma, Mausam Rao, Karnena K. Ahmed, Akram Dwivedi, Sharad Bhatt, Bhagwati Prasad Malik, Ram Kanwar Kumar, Virender McDonald, Andrew Eur J Soil Sci Physical Processes and Functions Deteriorating soil health, diminishing soil organic carbon (SOC), development of subsurface hard compact layer and declining system productivity are barriers to achieving sustainable production in the traditional rice–wheat cropping system (TA) in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain of India. Conservation agriculture (CA), which favours minimum soil disturbance, crop residue retention and crop diversification could be a viable alternative to the TA to address most of those major problems. With that in mind, a long‐term experiment is being implemented at ICAR‐RCER, Patna, Bihar, India, with four treatments: (a) TA, (b) full CA (fCA) and (c and d) partial CA (pCA1 and pCA2), differing in crop establishment methods, cropping system and crop residue management in a randomized complete block design. Measurement of soil health parameters was carried out in the 11th year of the experiment. The results revealed a beneficial effect of CA and 46 and 40% increase in SOC concentration and stock, respectively, under fCA over TA in the 0–7.5‐cm soil layer. The effect of partial CA (pCA1 and pCA2) was variable, but an increasing trend was always observed under pCA compared to TA. There was an enrichment in SOC content of aggregates under CA irrespective of size class; however, no relation was found between SOC content and aggregate diameter. The contribution of macroaggregates to SOC stock was larger (36–66%) under CA in the 0–7.5‐cm soil layer. Adoption of CA improved the macroaggregate content, MWD and GMD of aggregates, and aggregation ratio. Soil macropore content was greater under fCA, whereas other parameters were similar among treatments. The impact of CA was mostly limited to 0–7.5 cm soil layer and a maximum up to 15 cm soil depth while evaluation until 60 cm soil depth was realized. The yield of rice in CA was comparable to or higher than in TA, whereas the system rice equivalent yield was always higher (38–53%) under CA than under the conventional practices. Therefore, a CA‐based cropping system must be encouraged, to increase SOC status, improve aggregation stability and, consequently, sustain or increase system productivity, in order to achieve food and nutritional security in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic Plain of India. HIGHLIGHTS: Effects of long‐term conservation agriculture (CA) on soil C, aggregation and yield were evaluated. CA improved SOC concentration and stock by 46 and 40%, as well as macroaggregate SOC stock by 36–66%. Macro‐aggregation and mean weight diameter improved in CA but was mostly limited to a shallow soil depth. CA can be promoted for sustainability of a rice–wheat system due to higher productivity (38–53%). Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-02-18 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359171/ /pubmed/34413692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13092 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Soil Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society of Soil Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Physical Processes and Functions
Mondal, Surajit
Mishra, Janki Sharan
Poonia, Shish Pal
Kumar, Rakesh
Dubey, Rachana
Kumar, Santosh
Verma, Mausam
Rao, Karnena K.
Ahmed, Akram
Dwivedi, Sharad
Bhatt, Bhagwati Prasad
Malik, Ram Kanwar
Kumar, Virender
McDonald, Andrew
Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title_full Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title_fullStr Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title_full_unstemmed Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title_short Can yield, soil C and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern Indo‐Gangetic plain of India?
title_sort can yield, soil c and aggregation be improved under long‐term conservation agriculture in the eastern indo‐gangetic plain of india?
topic Physical Processes and Functions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13092
work_keys_str_mv AT mondalsurajit canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT mishrajankisharan canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT pooniashishpal canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT kumarrakesh canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT dubeyrachana canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT kumarsantosh canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT vermamausam canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT raokarnenak canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT ahmedakram canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT dwivedisharad canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT bhattbhagwatiprasad canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT malikramkanwar canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT kumarvirender canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia
AT mcdonaldandrew canyieldsoilcandaggregationbeimprovedunderlongtermconservationagricultureintheeasternindogangeticplainofindia