Cargando…

Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative

OBJECTIVE: To develop and seek consensus from procedure experts on the metrics that best characterise a reference robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and determine if the metrics distinguished between the objectively assessed RARP performance of experienced and novice urologists, as identify...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mottrie, Alexandre, Mazzone, Elio, Wiklund, Peter, Graefen, Markus, Collins, Justin W., De Groote, Ruben, Dell’Oglio, Paolo, Puliatti, Stefano, Gallagher, Anthony G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15311
_version_ 1783737493769682944
author Mottrie, Alexandre
Mazzone, Elio
Wiklund, Peter
Graefen, Markus
Collins, Justin W.
De Groote, Ruben
Dell’Oglio, Paolo
Puliatti, Stefano
Gallagher, Anthony G.
author_facet Mottrie, Alexandre
Mazzone, Elio
Wiklund, Peter
Graefen, Markus
Collins, Justin W.
De Groote, Ruben
Dell’Oglio, Paolo
Puliatti, Stefano
Gallagher, Anthony G.
author_sort Mottrie, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and seek consensus from procedure experts on the metrics that best characterise a reference robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and determine if the metrics distinguished between the objectively assessed RARP performance of experienced and novice urologists, as identifying objective performance metrics for surgical training in robotic surgery is imperative for patient safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Study 1, the metrics, i.e. 12 phases of the procedure, 81 steps, 245 errors and 110 critical errors for a reference RARP were developed and then presented to an international Delphi panel of 19 experienced urologists. In Study 2, 12 very experienced surgeons (VES) who had performed >500 RARPs and 12 novice urology surgeons performed a RARP, which was video recorded and assessed by two experienced urologists blinded as to subject and group. Percentage agreement between experienced urologists for the Delphi meeting and Mann–Whitney U‐ and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for construct validation of the newly identified RARP metrics. RESULTS: At the Delphi panel, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of the metrics for a reference RARP. In Study 2, the results showed that the VES performed ~4% more procedure steps and made 72% fewer procedure errors than the novices (P = 0.027). Phases VIIa and VIIb (i.e. neurovascular bundle dissection) best discriminated between the VES and novices. Limitations: VES whose performance was in the bottom half of their group demonstrated considerable error variability and made five‐times as many errors as the other half of the group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The international Delphi panel reached high‐level consensus on the RARP metrics that reliably distinguished between the objectively scored procedure performance of VES and novices. Reliable and valid performance metrics of RARP are imperative for effective and quality assured surgical training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83591922021-08-17 Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative Mottrie, Alexandre Mazzone, Elio Wiklund, Peter Graefen, Markus Collins, Justin W. De Groote, Ruben Dell’Oglio, Paolo Puliatti, Stefano Gallagher, Anthony G. BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To develop and seek consensus from procedure experts on the metrics that best characterise a reference robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and determine if the metrics distinguished between the objectively assessed RARP performance of experienced and novice urologists, as identifying objective performance metrics for surgical training in robotic surgery is imperative for patient safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Study 1, the metrics, i.e. 12 phases of the procedure, 81 steps, 245 errors and 110 critical errors for a reference RARP were developed and then presented to an international Delphi panel of 19 experienced urologists. In Study 2, 12 very experienced surgeons (VES) who had performed >500 RARPs and 12 novice urology surgeons performed a RARP, which was video recorded and assessed by two experienced urologists blinded as to subject and group. Percentage agreement between experienced urologists for the Delphi meeting and Mann–Whitney U‐ and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for construct validation of the newly identified RARP metrics. RESULTS: At the Delphi panel, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of the metrics for a reference RARP. In Study 2, the results showed that the VES performed ~4% more procedure steps and made 72% fewer procedure errors than the novices (P = 0.027). Phases VIIa and VIIb (i.e. neurovascular bundle dissection) best discriminated between the VES and novices. Limitations: VES whose performance was in the bottom half of their group demonstrated considerable error variability and made five‐times as many errors as the other half of the group (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The international Delphi panel reached high‐level consensus on the RARP metrics that reliably distinguished between the objectively scored procedure performance of VES and novices. Reliable and valid performance metrics of RARP are imperative for effective and quality assured surgical training. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-20 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359192/ /pubmed/33251703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15311 Text en © 2020 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mottrie, Alexandre
Mazzone, Elio
Wiklund, Peter
Graefen, Markus
Collins, Justin W.
De Groote, Ruben
Dell’Oglio, Paolo
Puliatti, Stefano
Gallagher, Anthony G.
Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title_full Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title_fullStr Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title_short Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): results from the ERUS Scientific and Educational Working Groups Metrics Initiative
title_sort objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (rarp): results from the erus scientific and educational working groups metrics initiative
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15311
work_keys_str_mv AT mottriealexandre objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT mazzoneelio objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT wiklundpeter objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT graefenmarkus objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT collinsjustinw objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT degrooteruben objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT dellogliopaolo objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT puliattistefano objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative
AT gallagheranthonyg objectiveassessmentofintraoperativeskillsforrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyrarpresultsfromtheerusscientificandeducationalworkinggroupsmetricsinitiative