Cargando…

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications

The novel Resoloy® rare earth magnesium alloy was developed for bioresorbable vascular implant application, as an alternative to the WE43 used in Biotronik's Magmaris scaffold, which received CE approval in 2016. Initially, the Magmaris showed very promising preclinical and clinical results, bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menze, Roman, Wittchow, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33386677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34790
_version_ 1783737503886344192
author Menze, Roman
Wittchow, Eric
author_facet Menze, Roman
Wittchow, Eric
author_sort Menze, Roman
collection PubMed
description The novel Resoloy® rare earth magnesium alloy was developed for bioresorbable vascular implant application, as an alternative to the WE43 used in Biotronik's Magmaris scaffold, which received CE approval in 2016. Initially, the Magmaris showed very promising preclinical and clinical results, but the formation of an unexpected conversion product and a too fast loss of integrity has proven to be a flaw. The safety and efficacy of Resoloy, which is intended to be bioresorbed without any remnants, has been investigated in an in vitro degradation study and a porcine coronary animal model. Four different groups of scaffolds composed of Resoloy (Res) as the backbone material and additionally equipped with a fluoride passivation layer (Res‐F), a polyester topcoat (Res‐P), or a duplex layer composed of a fluoride passivation layer and a polymeric topcoat (Res‐PF) were compared to a Magmaris scaffold in an in vitro degradation test. Preclinical safety and efficacy of Res‐F and Res‐PF were subsequently evaluated in a coronary porcine model for 12 and 28 days. Scanning electron microscope, quantitative coronary angiography, micro‐computed tomography, histopathology, and histomorphometry analyses were conducted to evaluate preclinical parameters and degradation behavior of the scaffolds. Res‐PF with a duplex layer shows the slowest degradation and the longest supporting force of all test groups. The in vitro data are confirmed by the results of the in vivo study, in which Res‐PF exhibited a longer supporting force than Res‐F, but also caused higher neointima formation. Both studied groups showed excellent biocompatibility. A starter colonization of the strut area with cells during bioresorption was observed. The in vitro degradation test shows that a combination of MgF(2) passivation and a PLLA topcoat on a Resoloy magnesium backbone (Res‐PF) leads to a much slower degradation and a longer support time than a Magmaris control group. In a preclinical study, the safety and efficacy of this duplex layer could be demonstrated. The beginning colonization of the degraded strut area by macrophages can be seen as clear indications that the resorption of the intermediate degradation product takes a different course than that of the Magmaris scaffold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83592362021-08-17 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications Menze, Roman Wittchow, Eric J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Original Research Reports The novel Resoloy® rare earth magnesium alloy was developed for bioresorbable vascular implant application, as an alternative to the WE43 used in Biotronik's Magmaris scaffold, which received CE approval in 2016. Initially, the Magmaris showed very promising preclinical and clinical results, but the formation of an unexpected conversion product and a too fast loss of integrity has proven to be a flaw. The safety and efficacy of Resoloy, which is intended to be bioresorbed without any remnants, has been investigated in an in vitro degradation study and a porcine coronary animal model. Four different groups of scaffolds composed of Resoloy (Res) as the backbone material and additionally equipped with a fluoride passivation layer (Res‐F), a polyester topcoat (Res‐P), or a duplex layer composed of a fluoride passivation layer and a polymeric topcoat (Res‐PF) were compared to a Magmaris scaffold in an in vitro degradation test. Preclinical safety and efficacy of Res‐F and Res‐PF were subsequently evaluated in a coronary porcine model for 12 and 28 days. Scanning electron microscope, quantitative coronary angiography, micro‐computed tomography, histopathology, and histomorphometry analyses were conducted to evaluate preclinical parameters and degradation behavior of the scaffolds. Res‐PF with a duplex layer shows the slowest degradation and the longest supporting force of all test groups. The in vitro data are confirmed by the results of the in vivo study, in which Res‐PF exhibited a longer supporting force than Res‐F, but also caused higher neointima formation. Both studied groups showed excellent biocompatibility. A starter colonization of the strut area with cells during bioresorption was observed. The in vitro degradation test shows that a combination of MgF(2) passivation and a PLLA topcoat on a Resoloy magnesium backbone (Res‐PF) leads to a much slower degradation and a longer support time than a Magmaris control group. In a preclinical study, the safety and efficacy of this duplex layer could be demonstrated. The beginning colonization of the degraded strut area by macrophages can be seen as clear indications that the resorption of the intermediate degradation product takes a different course than that of the Magmaris scaffold. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-01-01 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8359236/ /pubmed/33386677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34790 Text en © 2021 MeKo Laser Material Processing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Reports
Menze, Roman
Wittchow, Eric
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title_full In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title_short In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
title_sort in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a novel bioresorbable magnesium scaffold with different surface modifications
topic Original Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33386677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34790
work_keys_str_mv AT menzeroman invitroandinvivoevaluationofanovelbioresorbablemagnesiumscaffoldwithdifferentsurfacemodifications
AT wittchoweric invitroandinvivoevaluationofanovelbioresorbablemagnesiumscaffoldwithdifferentsurfacemodifications