Cargando…

The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Post‐extraction bone resorption may affect the outcome of ensuing restorations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a comprehensive laser post‐extraction protocol by comparing resulting alveolar bone regeneration with that obtained after standard extraction procedure. MATERIALS AND MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra, Pajk, Franja, Olivi, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33686771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12991
_version_ 1783737505028243456
author Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra
Pajk, Franja
Olivi, Giovanni
author_facet Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra
Pajk, Franja
Olivi, Giovanni
author_sort Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post‐extraction bone resorption may affect the outcome of ensuing restorations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a comprehensive laser post‐extraction protocol by comparing resulting alveolar bone regeneration with that obtained after standard extraction procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 53 simple extractions were randomized to either laser or control group. In the laser group, erbium (Er:YAG; 2940 nm) and neodymium (Nd:YAG; 1064 nm) lasers were used for degranulation, disinfection, de‐epithelialization of the surrounding gingiva, clot stabilization, and photobiomodulation. The primary outcome measure was change in bone density in the extraction area between day 1 and 4 months after extraction. Patients were monitored for potential side effects. RESULTS: Increase in bone density at the follow‐up CBCT was significantly higher in laser than in control group (p < 0.001). No post‐operative pain, bleeding, or swelling was present in the laser group. In the control group, one patient had bleeding 3–5 days after extraction, two patients had swelling and three patients reported post‐operative pain rated 3–5 on a 0–10 pain scale up to 3 days after extraction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed laser post‐extraction procedure is a safe and effective method to improve post‐extraction bone healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83592412021-08-17 The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra Pajk, Franja Olivi, Giovanni Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Post‐extraction bone resorption may affect the outcome of ensuing restorations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate a comprehensive laser post‐extraction protocol by comparing resulting alveolar bone regeneration with that obtained after standard extraction procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 53 simple extractions were randomized to either laser or control group. In the laser group, erbium (Er:YAG; 2940 nm) and neodymium (Nd:YAG; 1064 nm) lasers were used for degranulation, disinfection, de‐epithelialization of the surrounding gingiva, clot stabilization, and photobiomodulation. The primary outcome measure was change in bone density in the extraction area between day 1 and 4 months after extraction. Patients were monitored for potential side effects. RESULTS: Increase in bone density at the follow‐up CBCT was significantly higher in laser than in control group (p < 0.001). No post‐operative pain, bleeding, or swelling was present in the laser group. In the control group, one patient had bleeding 3–5 days after extraction, two patients had swelling and three patients reported post‐operative pain rated 3–5 on a 0–10 pain scale up to 3 days after extraction. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed laser post‐extraction procedure is a safe and effective method to improve post‐extraction bone healing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-03-08 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8359241/ /pubmed/33686771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12991 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Križaj Dumić, Aleksandra
Pajk, Franja
Olivi, Giovanni
The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title_full The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title_short The effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: Randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of post‐extraction socket preservation laser treatment on bone density 4 months after extraction: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33686771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12991
work_keys_str_mv AT krizajdumicaleksandra theeffectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pajkfranja theeffectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olivigiovanni theeffectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krizajdumicaleksandra effectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pajkfranja effectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT olivigiovanni effectofpostextractionsocketpreservationlasertreatmentonbonedensity4monthsafterextractionrandomizedcontrolledtrial