Cargando…
Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: After dermatitis, acne is the next skin disease to contribute most to the burden of skin diseases worldwide. Recently, seven core outcome domains have been identified, which together form an Acne Core Outcome Set (ACORN). One of these was satisfaction with acne treatment. OBJECTIVES: To...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19675 |
_version_ | 1783737517442334720 |
---|---|
author | van Zuuren, E.J. Arents, B.W.M. Miklas, M. Schoones, J.W. Tan, J. |
author_facet | van Zuuren, E.J. Arents, B.W.M. Miklas, M. Schoones, J.W. Tan, J. |
author_sort | van Zuuren, E.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: After dermatitis, acne is the next skin disease to contribute most to the burden of skin diseases worldwide. Recently, seven core outcome domains have been identified, which together form an Acne Core Outcome Set (ACORN). One of these was satisfaction with acne treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify studies that described the development of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMS), evaluated one or more measurement properties of a PROM, or evaluated the interpretability of a PROM in patients with acne regarding treatment satisfaction. METHODS: The COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) search strategy for identifying PROMS on acne treatment satisfaction was used. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and Academic Search premier (June 2020). Study selection, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality according to COSMIN guidance were carried out independently by two authors. RESULTS: Only one study could be included, describing the development of a treatment satisfaction measure in patients with acne. The development was assessed as inadequate and data on measurement properties were lacking. Additionally, we found 188 studies reporting treatment satisfaction solely as an outcome, using a wide variety of methods, none of them standardized or validated. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find a PROM on treatment satisfaction to recommend for a core outcome set in acne. There is an unmet need for a PROM on treatment satisfaction in acne that is robustly developed, designed and validated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8359297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83592972021-08-17 Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review van Zuuren, E.J. Arents, B.W.M. Miklas, M. Schoones, J.W. Tan, J. Br J Dermatol Evidence‐Based Dermatology BACKGROUND: After dermatitis, acne is the next skin disease to contribute most to the burden of skin diseases worldwide. Recently, seven core outcome domains have been identified, which together form an Acne Core Outcome Set (ACORN). One of these was satisfaction with acne treatment. OBJECTIVES: To identify studies that described the development of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMS), evaluated one or more measurement properties of a PROM, or evaluated the interpretability of a PROM in patients with acne regarding treatment satisfaction. METHODS: The COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) search strategy for identifying PROMS on acne treatment satisfaction was used. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and Academic Search premier (June 2020). Study selection, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality according to COSMIN guidance were carried out independently by two authors. RESULTS: Only one study could be included, describing the development of a treatment satisfaction measure in patients with acne. The development was assessed as inadequate and data on measurement properties were lacking. Additionally, we found 188 studies reporting treatment satisfaction solely as an outcome, using a wide variety of methods, none of them standardized or validated. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find a PROM on treatment satisfaction to recommend for a core outcome set in acne. There is an unmet need for a PROM on treatment satisfaction in acne that is robustly developed, designed and validated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-28 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359297/ /pubmed/33176002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19675 Text en © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Evidence‐Based Dermatology van Zuuren, E.J. Arents, B.W.M. Miklas, M. Schoones, J.W. Tan, J. Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review |
title | Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
|
title_full | Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
|
title_fullStr | Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
|
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
|
title_short | Identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review
|
title_sort | identifying and appraising patient‐reported outcome measures on treatment satisfaction in acne: a systematic review |
topic | Evidence‐Based Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanzuurenej identifyingandappraisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresontreatmentsatisfactioninacneasystematicreview AT arentsbwm identifyingandappraisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresontreatmentsatisfactioninacneasystematicreview AT miklasm identifyingandappraisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresontreatmentsatisfactioninacneasystematicreview AT schoonesjw identifyingandappraisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresontreatmentsatisfactioninacneasystematicreview AT tanj identifyingandappraisingpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresontreatmentsatisfactioninacneasystematicreview |