Cargando…

Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia

This study assesses toxicity of groundwater from remediated fuel spill sites, as the final phase of an environmental risk assessment of contaminated sites at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Tasmania, Australia. To complement previous terrestrial ecotoxicological research, we determine risk to marine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Catherine K, Wasley, Jane, Holan, Jessica, Richardson, Jeremy, Spedding, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4382
_version_ 1783737535830163456
author King, Catherine K
Wasley, Jane
Holan, Jessica
Richardson, Jeremy
Spedding, Tim
author_facet King, Catherine K
Wasley, Jane
Holan, Jessica
Richardson, Jeremy
Spedding, Tim
author_sort King, Catherine K
collection PubMed
description This study assesses toxicity of groundwater from remediated fuel spill sites, as the final phase of an environmental risk assessment of contaminated sites at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Tasmania, Australia. To complement previous terrestrial ecotoxicological research, we determine risk to marine environments from residual biodegraded hydrocarbon contaminants in groundwater discharges. Direct toxicity assessments were conducted on 7 composite groundwater test solutions, adjusted to ambient seawater salinity. Eleven native marine invertebrates (from varied taxa: gastropods, bivalves, flatworms, amphipods, copepods, isopods) were exposed and observed for up to 21 d. Lethal time estimates (LT10, LT50) showed sensitivity was time dependent (LT10s = 4–15 d) and variable between species. Three species showed no response to any test solution, and most species did not respond for up to 5 d. Data were interpreted using an expert judgment response matrix with multiple lines of evidence to predict risk. No consistent patterns in the relative toxicity of test solutions, based on polar or nonpolar hydrocarbon concentrations, were identified. Although toxicity was observed in some species, this was only under worst‐case conditions of undiluted, continuous, extended exposure. Natural dynamics of the site, including low groundwater discharge rates, high rainfall, and a highly energetic receiving environment, ensure groundwater is rapidly diluted and dispersed. In this context, and based on site conditions at the time of testing, these toxicity assessments provide robust evidence that residual contamination in groundwater at remediated sites at Macquarie Island is unlikely to represent a risk to the adjacent marine communities tested. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:785–801. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83593752021-08-17 Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia King, Catherine K Wasley, Jane Holan, Jessica Richardson, Jeremy Spedding, Tim Integr Environ Assess Manag Health & Ecological Risk Assessment This study assesses toxicity of groundwater from remediated fuel spill sites, as the final phase of an environmental risk assessment of contaminated sites at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Tasmania, Australia. To complement previous terrestrial ecotoxicological research, we determine risk to marine environments from residual biodegraded hydrocarbon contaminants in groundwater discharges. Direct toxicity assessments were conducted on 7 composite groundwater test solutions, adjusted to ambient seawater salinity. Eleven native marine invertebrates (from varied taxa: gastropods, bivalves, flatworms, amphipods, copepods, isopods) were exposed and observed for up to 21 d. Lethal time estimates (LT10, LT50) showed sensitivity was time dependent (LT10s = 4–15 d) and variable between species. Three species showed no response to any test solution, and most species did not respond for up to 5 d. Data were interpreted using an expert judgment response matrix with multiple lines of evidence to predict risk. No consistent patterns in the relative toxicity of test solutions, based on polar or nonpolar hydrocarbon concentrations, were identified. Although toxicity was observed in some species, this was only under worst‐case conditions of undiluted, continuous, extended exposure. Natural dynamics of the site, including low groundwater discharge rates, high rainfall, and a highly energetic receiving environment, ensure groundwater is rapidly diluted and dispersed. In this context, and based on site conditions at the time of testing, these toxicity assessments provide robust evidence that residual contamination in groundwater at remediated sites at Macquarie Island is unlikely to represent a risk to the adjacent marine communities tested. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:785–801. © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-10 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359375/ /pubmed/33369043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4382 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health & Ecological Risk Assessment
King, Catherine K
Wasley, Jane
Holan, Jessica
Richardson, Jeremy
Spedding, Tim
Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title_full Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title_fullStr Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title_short Using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐Antarctic Macquarie Island, Australia
title_sort using an expert judgment response matrix to assess the risk of groundwater discharges from remediated fuel spill sites to the marine environment at sub‐antarctic macquarie island, australia
topic Health & Ecological Risk Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4382
work_keys_str_mv AT kingcatherinek usinganexpertjudgmentresponsematrixtoassesstheriskofgroundwaterdischargesfromremediatedfuelspillsitestothemarineenvironmentatsubantarcticmacquarieislandaustralia
AT wasleyjane usinganexpertjudgmentresponsematrixtoassesstheriskofgroundwaterdischargesfromremediatedfuelspillsitestothemarineenvironmentatsubantarcticmacquarieislandaustralia
AT holanjessica usinganexpertjudgmentresponsematrixtoassesstheriskofgroundwaterdischargesfromremediatedfuelspillsitestothemarineenvironmentatsubantarcticmacquarieislandaustralia
AT richardsonjeremy usinganexpertjudgmentresponsematrixtoassesstheriskofgroundwaterdischargesfromremediatedfuelspillsitestothemarineenvironmentatsubantarcticmacquarieislandaustralia
AT speddingtim usinganexpertjudgmentresponsematrixtoassesstheriskofgroundwaterdischargesfromremediatedfuelspillsitestothemarineenvironmentatsubantarcticmacquarieislandaustralia