Cargando…
Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium
Agencies consult extensively with stakeholders such as industry associations, nongovernmental organizations, and trade unions. One rationale for consultations is that these improve procedural legitimacy and lead to greater acceptance of regulatory outcomes by citizens and the regulated industry. Whi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12323 |
_version_ | 1783737543194312704 |
---|---|
author | Beyers, Jan Arras, Sarah |
author_facet | Beyers, Jan Arras, Sarah |
author_sort | Beyers, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agencies consult extensively with stakeholders such as industry associations, nongovernmental organizations, and trade unions. One rationale for consultations is that these improve procedural legitimacy and lead to greater acceptance of regulatory outcomes by citizens and the regulated industry. While this presumption of a positive relation between stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of agencies is widespread, research analyzing this relationship remains scarce. Using a survey experiment, we examine the effect of open and closed consultations on the acceptance of procedures and regulatory outcomes in the field of environmental politics. The results demonstrate that consultation arrangements positively affect the acceptance of decision‐making procedures, especially when regulators grant access to different types of stakeholders. However, although the consultation arrangement itself does not directly affect acceptance of the regulatory outcome, procedural legitimacy matters, as it increases decision acceptance among individuals who are negatively disposed toward government regulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8359407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83594072021-08-17 Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium Beyers, Jan Arras, Sarah Regul Gov Regular Papers Agencies consult extensively with stakeholders such as industry associations, nongovernmental organizations, and trade unions. One rationale for consultations is that these improve procedural legitimacy and lead to greater acceptance of regulatory outcomes by citizens and the regulated industry. While this presumption of a positive relation between stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of agencies is widespread, research analyzing this relationship remains scarce. Using a survey experiment, we examine the effect of open and closed consultations on the acceptance of procedures and regulatory outcomes in the field of environmental politics. The results demonstrate that consultation arrangements positively affect the acceptance of decision‐making procedures, especially when regulators grant access to different types of stakeholders. However, although the consultation arrangement itself does not directly affect acceptance of the regulatory outcome, procedural legitimacy matters, as it increases decision acceptance among individuals who are negatively disposed toward government regulation. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-06-11 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359407/ /pubmed/34413895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12323 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Regulation & Governance Published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Regular Papers Beyers, Jan Arras, Sarah Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title | Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title_full | Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title_short | Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium |
title_sort | stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: a survey experiment in belgium |
topic | Regular Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34413895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beyersjan stakeholderconsultationsandthelegitimacyofregulatorydecisionmakingasurveyexperimentinbelgium AT arrassarah stakeholderconsultationsandthelegitimacyofregulatorydecisionmakingasurveyexperimentinbelgium |