Cargando…

Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the associations of both individual-level and county-level social capital with individual health in China during a period of rapid economic growth. DESIGN AND SETTING: A serial cross-sectional study in China. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The participants were 42 829 Chin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Yang, Chung, Roger Yat-Nork
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044616
_version_ 1783737557044953088
author Han, Yang
Chung, Roger Yat-Nork
author_facet Han, Yang
Chung, Roger Yat-Nork
author_sort Han, Yang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the associations of both individual-level and county-level social capital with individual health in China during a period of rapid economic growth. DESIGN AND SETTING: A serial cross-sectional study in China. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The participants were 42 829 Chinese adults (aged ≥18 years) from the 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2015 Chinese General Social Survey. The outcomes were self-rated physical and mental health in all time points. We assessed social capital by the individual-level and county-level indicators, including frequency of socialising, civic participation and trust. We conducted multilevel binary logistic regression models to examine the associations of individual-level and county-level social capital with self-rated physical and mental health. RESULTS: At the individual level, high frequency of socialising (2010—OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.33 to 1.66; 2012—OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.54; 2013—OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.42; 2015—OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.50) and high trust (2010—OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.47; 2012—OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.42; 2013—OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.33; 2015—OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.55) was significantly associated with good physical health in all years. At the individual level, high frequency of socialising (2010—OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.42; 2012—OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.34; 2013—OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.45; 2015—OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.50) and high trust (2010—OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.61; 2012—OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.56; 2013—OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.49; 2015—OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.57) was also significantly associated with good mental health in all years. No evidence showed that the associations of individual-level frequency of socialising and trust with physical and mental health changed over time. There were no consistent associations of individual-level civic participation or any county-level social capital indicators with physical or mental health. CONCLUSION: The positive associations of individual-level social capital in terms of socialising and trust with physical and mental health were robust during a period of rapid economic growth. Improving individual-level socialising and trust for health promotion could be a long-term strategy even within a rapidly developing society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83594722021-08-30 Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015 Han, Yang Chung, Roger Yat-Nork BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the associations of both individual-level and county-level social capital with individual health in China during a period of rapid economic growth. DESIGN AND SETTING: A serial cross-sectional study in China. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The participants were 42 829 Chinese adults (aged ≥18 years) from the 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2015 Chinese General Social Survey. The outcomes were self-rated physical and mental health in all time points. We assessed social capital by the individual-level and county-level indicators, including frequency of socialising, civic participation and trust. We conducted multilevel binary logistic regression models to examine the associations of individual-level and county-level social capital with self-rated physical and mental health. RESULTS: At the individual level, high frequency of socialising (2010—OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.33 to 1.66; 2012—OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.54; 2013—OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.42; 2015—OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.50) and high trust (2010—OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.47; 2012—OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.42; 2013—OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.33; 2015—OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.55) was significantly associated with good physical health in all years. At the individual level, high frequency of socialising (2010—OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.42; 2012—OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.34; 2013—OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.45; 2015—OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.50) and high trust (2010—OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.61; 2012—OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.56; 2013—OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.49; 2015—OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.57) was also significantly associated with good mental health in all years. No evidence showed that the associations of individual-level frequency of socialising and trust with physical and mental health changed over time. There were no consistent associations of individual-level civic participation or any county-level social capital indicators with physical or mental health. CONCLUSION: The positive associations of individual-level social capital in terms of socialising and trust with physical and mental health were robust during a period of rapid economic growth. Improving individual-level socialising and trust for health promotion could be a long-term strategy even within a rapidly developing society. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8359472/ /pubmed/34380714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044616 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Han, Yang
Chung, Roger Yat-Nork
Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title_full Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title_fullStr Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title_full_unstemmed Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title_short Are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? A serial cross-sectional analysis in China, 2010–2015
title_sort are both individual-level and county-level social capital associated with individual health? a serial cross-sectional analysis in china, 2010–2015
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044616
work_keys_str_mv AT hanyang arebothindividuallevelandcountylevelsocialcapitalassociatedwithindividualhealthaserialcrosssectionalanalysisinchina20102015
AT chungrogeryatnork arebothindividuallevelandcountylevelsocialcapitalassociatedwithindividualhealthaserialcrosssectionalanalysisinchina20102015