Cargando…

Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: Essential medicines lists have been created and used globally in countries that range from low-income to high-income status. The aim of this paper is to compare the essential medicines list of high-income countries with each other, the WHO’s Model List of Essential Medicines and the lists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taglione, Michael Sergio, Persaud, Nav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045262
_version_ 1783737558237184000
author Taglione, Michael Sergio
Persaud, Nav
author_facet Taglione, Michael Sergio
Persaud, Nav
author_sort Taglione, Michael Sergio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Essential medicines lists have been created and used globally in countries that range from low-income to high-income status. The aim of this paper is to compare the essential medicines list of high-income countries with each other, the WHO’s Model List of Essential Medicines and the lists of countries of other income statuses. DESIGN: High-income countries were defined by World Bank classification. High-income essential medicines lists were assessed for medicine inclusion and were compared with the subset of high-income countries, the WHO’s Model List and 137 national essential medicines lists. Medicine lists were obtained from the Global Essential Medicines database. Countries were subdivided by income status, and the groups’ most common medicines were compared. Select medicines and medicine classes were assessed for inclusion among high-income country lists. RESULTS: The 21 high-income countries identified were most like each other when compared with other lists. They were more like upper middle-income countries and least like low-income countries. There was significant variability in the number of medicines on each list. Less than half (48%) of high-income countries included a newer diabetes medicines in their list. Most countries (71%) included naloxone while every country including at least one opioid medicine. More than half of the lists (52%) included a medicine that has been globally withdrawn or banned. CONCLUSION: Essential medicines lists of high-income countries are similar to each other, but significant variations in essential medicine list composition and specifically the number of medications included were noted. Effective medicines were left off several countries’ lists, and globally recalled medicines were included on over half the lists. Comparing the essential medicines lists of countries within the same income status category can provide a useful subset of lists for policymakers and essential medicine list creators to use when creating or maintaining their lists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83594802021-08-30 Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study Taglione, Michael Sergio Persaud, Nav BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: Essential medicines lists have been created and used globally in countries that range from low-income to high-income status. The aim of this paper is to compare the essential medicines list of high-income countries with each other, the WHO’s Model List of Essential Medicines and the lists of countries of other income statuses. DESIGN: High-income countries were defined by World Bank classification. High-income essential medicines lists were assessed for medicine inclusion and were compared with the subset of high-income countries, the WHO’s Model List and 137 national essential medicines lists. Medicine lists were obtained from the Global Essential Medicines database. Countries were subdivided by income status, and the groups’ most common medicines were compared. Select medicines and medicine classes were assessed for inclusion among high-income country lists. RESULTS: The 21 high-income countries identified were most like each other when compared with other lists. They were more like upper middle-income countries and least like low-income countries. There was significant variability in the number of medicines on each list. Less than half (48%) of high-income countries included a newer diabetes medicines in their list. Most countries (71%) included naloxone while every country including at least one opioid medicine. More than half of the lists (52%) included a medicine that has been globally withdrawn or banned. CONCLUSION: Essential medicines lists of high-income countries are similar to each other, but significant variations in essential medicine list composition and specifically the number of medications included were noted. Effective medicines were left off several countries’ lists, and globally recalled medicines were included on over half the lists. Comparing the essential medicines lists of countries within the same income status category can provide a useful subset of lists for policymakers and essential medicine list creators to use when creating or maintaining their lists. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8359480/ /pubmed/34380717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045262 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Taglione, Michael Sergio
Persaud, Nav
Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title_full Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title_short Assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
title_sort assessing variation among the national essential medicines lists of 21 high-income countries: a cross-sectional study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045262
work_keys_str_mv AT taglionemichaelsergio assessingvariationamongthenationalessentialmedicineslistsof21highincomecountriesacrosssectionalstudy
AT persaudnav assessingvariationamongthenationalessentialmedicineslistsof21highincomecountriesacrosssectionalstudy