Cargando…

A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population

Localized wastewater surveillance has allowed for public health officials to gain a broader understanding of SARS-CoV-2 viral prevalence in the community allowing public health officials time to prepare for impending outbreaks. Given variable levels of virus in the population through public health i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Brien, Megan, Rundell, Zachary C., Nemec, Michelle D., Langan, Laura M., Back, Jeffrey A., Lugo, Joaquin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149595
_version_ 1783737562559414272
author O'Brien, Megan
Rundell, Zachary C.
Nemec, Michelle D.
Langan, Laura M.
Back, Jeffrey A.
Lugo, Joaquin N.
author_facet O'Brien, Megan
Rundell, Zachary C.
Nemec, Michelle D.
Langan, Laura M.
Back, Jeffrey A.
Lugo, Joaquin N.
author_sort O'Brien, Megan
collection PubMed
description Localized wastewater surveillance has allowed for public health officials to gain a broader understanding of SARS-CoV-2 viral prevalence in the community allowing public health officials time to prepare for impending outbreaks. Given variable levels of virus in the population through public health interventions, proper concentration and extraction of viral RNA is a key step in ensuring accurate detections. With many commercial RNA extraction kits and methodologies available, the performance of 4 different kits were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in wastewater, specifically focusing on their applicability to lower population densities such as those at university campus dorms. Raw wastewater samples were collected at 4 sites on a college campus over a 24 hour period as a composite sample. Included in these sites was an isolation site that housed students that tested positive for Covid-19 via nasopharyngeal swabs. These samples were analyzed using the following kits: Qiagen All Prep PowerViral DNA/RNA kit, New England BioLabs Monarch RNA MiniPrep Kit, and Zymo Quick RNA-Viral Kit, and the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit. All four sites were processed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Extractions were then quantified with RT-qPCR one-step reactions using an N2 primer and a linearized plasmid standard. While the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit (also known as the Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit) only recovered approximately 73% (±38%) SARS-CoV-2 RNA compared to the Zymo Quick-RNA Viral kit, it was the most time efficient kit to yield comparable results. This extraction kit had a cumulative processing time of approximately 5 h compared, while the other three kits had processing times between approximately 9 and 9.5 h. Based on the current research, the most effective kits for smaller population densities are pellet based and include a homogenization, inhibitor removal, and RNA preservation step.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83594972021-08-12 A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population O'Brien, Megan Rundell, Zachary C. Nemec, Michelle D. Langan, Laura M. Back, Jeffrey A. Lugo, Joaquin N. Sci Total Environ Article Localized wastewater surveillance has allowed for public health officials to gain a broader understanding of SARS-CoV-2 viral prevalence in the community allowing public health officials time to prepare for impending outbreaks. Given variable levels of virus in the population through public health interventions, proper concentration and extraction of viral RNA is a key step in ensuring accurate detections. With many commercial RNA extraction kits and methodologies available, the performance of 4 different kits were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in wastewater, specifically focusing on their applicability to lower population densities such as those at university campus dorms. Raw wastewater samples were collected at 4 sites on a college campus over a 24 hour period as a composite sample. Included in these sites was an isolation site that housed students that tested positive for Covid-19 via nasopharyngeal swabs. These samples were analyzed using the following kits: Qiagen All Prep PowerViral DNA/RNA kit, New England BioLabs Monarch RNA MiniPrep Kit, and Zymo Quick RNA-Viral Kit, and the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit. All four sites were processed according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Extractions were then quantified with RT-qPCR one-step reactions using an N2 primer and a linearized plasmid standard. While the Zymo Quick-RNA Fecal/Soil Microbe MicroPrep Kit (also known as the Zymo Environ Water RNA Kit) only recovered approximately 73% (±38%) SARS-CoV-2 RNA compared to the Zymo Quick-RNA Viral kit, it was the most time efficient kit to yield comparable results. This extraction kit had a cumulative processing time of approximately 5 h compared, while the other three kits had processing times between approximately 9 and 9.5 h. Based on the current research, the most effective kits for smaller population densities are pellet based and include a homogenization, inhibitor removal, and RNA preservation step. Elsevier B.V. 2021-12-20 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8359497/ /pubmed/34418621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149595 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
O'Brien, Megan
Rundell, Zachary C.
Nemec, Michelle D.
Langan, Laura M.
Back, Jeffrey A.
Lugo, Joaquin N.
A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title_full A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title_fullStr A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title_short A comparison of four commercially available RNA extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in a college population
title_sort comparison of four commercially available rna extraction kits for wastewater surveillance of sars-cov-2 in a college population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34418621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149595
work_keys_str_mv AT obrienmegan acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT rundellzacharyc acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT nemecmichelled acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT langanlauram acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT backjeffreya acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT lugojoaquinn acomparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT obrienmegan comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT rundellzacharyc comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT nemecmichelled comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT langanlauram comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT backjeffreya comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation
AT lugojoaquinn comparisonoffourcommerciallyavailablernaextractionkitsforwastewatersurveillanceofsarscov2inacollegepopulation