Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach

BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Preeti, Srivastava, Nikhil, Rana, Vivek, Kaushik, Noopur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. RESULTS: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S55–S63.