Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with bio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870 |
_version_ | 1783737628147843072 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Preeti Srivastava, Nikhil Rana, Vivek Kaushik, Noopur |
author_facet | Singh, Preeti Srivastava, Nikhil Rana, Vivek Kaushik, Noopur |
author_sort | Singh, Preeti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. RESULTS: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S55–S63. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8359882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83598822021-08-24 Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach Singh, Preeti Srivastava, Nikhil Rana, Vivek Kaushik, Noopur Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. RESULTS: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S55–S63. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8359882/ /pubmed/34434015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Singh, Preeti Srivastava, Nikhil Rana, Vivek Kaushik, Noopur Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title | Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of restoration of grossly carious primary teeth using biological approach |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhpreeti clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach AT srivastavanikhil clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach AT ranavivek clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach AT kaushiknoopur clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach |