Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach

BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with bio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Preeti, Srivastava, Nikhil, Rana, Vivek, Kaushik, Noopur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870
_version_ 1783737628147843072
author Singh, Preeti
Srivastava, Nikhil
Rana, Vivek
Kaushik, Noopur
author_facet Singh, Preeti
Srivastava, Nikhil
Rana, Vivek
Kaushik, Noopur
author_sort Singh, Preeti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. RESULTS: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S55–S63.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83598822021-08-24 Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach Singh, Preeti Srivastava, Nikhil Rana, Vivek Kaushik, Noopur Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: To widen the treatment option of primary teeth with mutilated crown tooth structure but having more than two-thirds of root structure were restored by using natural tooth crowns with the help of adhesive materials. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To restore the grossly decayed primary molars with biological crowns and to evaluate them for longevity, change in color, occlusal wear, marginal integrity, and patient/parent acceptance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty primary molars from 6 to 10 years old children were restored with biological crowns (extracted/exfoliated tooth crowns) and follow-up was done till 12 months. Data tabulated and results were statistically analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The statistical software SPSS 19.0 was used. RESULTS: 89.47% of biological restorations survived successfully till 12 months follow-up period. No occlusal wear was found in any of the samples, a breach in marginal integrity was seen only in 16.6% of cases, and only 5.5% of biological crowns showed discoloration (darker) at 12 months intervals. 65.00% of patients well accepted the treatment and showed satisfaction while 20.0% of patients remained neutral. Only 15% of patients experienced dissatisfaction at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Biological restorations proved to be a viable alternative for the restoration of grossly mutilated primary molars. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Singh P, Srivastava N, Rana V, et al. Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S55–S63. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8359882/ /pubmed/34434015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Preeti
Srivastava, Nikhil
Rana, Vivek
Kaushik, Noopur
Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title_full Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title_short Clinical Evaluation of Restoration of Grossly Carious Primary Teeth Using Biological Approach
title_sort clinical evaluation of restoration of grossly carious primary teeth using biological approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434015
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1870
work_keys_str_mv AT singhpreeti clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach
AT srivastavanikhil clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach
AT ranavivek clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach
AT kaushiknoopur clinicalevaluationofrestorationofgrosslycariousprimaryteethusingbiologicalapproach