Cargando…

Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the apical sealing ability and periapical extrusion in the Thermafil™ obturation technique, with and without an apical barrier of MTA, with lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human central incisors were instru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Ajay S, Mathur, Rinku, Shah, Nimisha C, Malge, Rajeshkrishna, Sathnoorkar, Sharanpriya, Chandrasekhar, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434013
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1865
_version_ 1783737629320151040
author Rao, Ajay S
Mathur, Rinku
Shah, Nimisha C
Malge, Rajeshkrishna
Sathnoorkar, Sharanpriya
Chandrasekhar, T
author_facet Rao, Ajay S
Mathur, Rinku
Shah, Nimisha C
Malge, Rajeshkrishna
Sathnoorkar, Sharanpriya
Chandrasekhar, T
author_sort Rao, Ajay S
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the apical sealing ability and periapical extrusion in the Thermafil™ obturation technique, with and without an apical barrier of MTA, with lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human central incisors were instrumented with the crown down technique and divided into three experimental groups. Group I: lateral condensation technique obturation, group II: Thermafil obturation (DENTSPLY Tulsa), and group III: this group was obturated into two parts; first MTA (ProRoot) was placed in apical 3 mm and later the remaining canal was obturated with Thermafil™ obturation technique (DENTSPLY Tulsa). AH Plus sealer was used in all the groups. Specimens of all the groups were layered with nail paint excluding the apical 3 mm. Twenty-four hours later, all the teeth were suspended in Black India ink for 48 hours. Finally, all the teeth were decalcified, rendered transparent and linear dye leakage and periapical extrusion was measured using ×60 magnification of stereomicroscope with an in-built ruler. RESULTS: A Chi-square test done to evaluate periapical extrusion showed there was a significant difference found among all the groups (p < 0.05), whereas in case of linear apical dye leakage using a Student's “t” test showed there was no significant difference among all the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite showing apical leakage, the thermo-plasticized gutta-percha obturation technique can be advantageous when used with MTA as an apical barrier since there is no scope for apical extrusion along with the benefit of three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system when compared with the lateral condensation technique. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rao AS, Mathur R, Shah NC, et al. Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S40–S44.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83598872021-08-24 Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study Rao, Ajay S Mathur, Rinku Shah, Nimisha C Malge, Rajeshkrishna Sathnoorkar, Sharanpriya Chandrasekhar, T Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the apical sealing ability and periapical extrusion in the Thermafil™ obturation technique, with and without an apical barrier of MTA, with lateral condensation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty freshly extracted human central incisors were instrumented with the crown down technique and divided into three experimental groups. Group I: lateral condensation technique obturation, group II: Thermafil obturation (DENTSPLY Tulsa), and group III: this group was obturated into two parts; first MTA (ProRoot) was placed in apical 3 mm and later the remaining canal was obturated with Thermafil™ obturation technique (DENTSPLY Tulsa). AH Plus sealer was used in all the groups. Specimens of all the groups were layered with nail paint excluding the apical 3 mm. Twenty-four hours later, all the teeth were suspended in Black India ink for 48 hours. Finally, all the teeth were decalcified, rendered transparent and linear dye leakage and periapical extrusion was measured using ×60 magnification of stereomicroscope with an in-built ruler. RESULTS: A Chi-square test done to evaluate periapical extrusion showed there was a significant difference found among all the groups (p < 0.05), whereas in case of linear apical dye leakage using a Student's “t” test showed there was no significant difference among all the groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite showing apical leakage, the thermo-plasticized gutta-percha obturation technique can be advantageous when used with MTA as an apical barrier since there is no scope for apical extrusion along with the benefit of three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system when compared with the lateral condensation technique. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rao AS, Mathur R, Shah NC, et al. Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(S-1):S40–S44. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8359887/ /pubmed/34434013 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1865 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rao, Ajay S
Mathur, Rinku
Shah, Nimisha C
Malge, Rajeshkrishna
Sathnoorkar, Sharanpriya
Chandrasekhar, T
Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_full Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_short Evaluation of Extrusion and Apical Seal of Thermafil™ Obturation with and without MTA as an Apical Barrier in Comparison with Lateral Condensation Technique: An In Vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of extrusion and apical seal of thermafil™ obturation with and without mta as an apical barrier in comparison with lateral condensation technique: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34434013
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1865
work_keys_str_mv AT raoajays evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT mathurrinku evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT shahnimishac evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT malgerajeshkrishna evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT sathnoorkarsharanpriya evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy
AT chandrasekhart evaluationofextrusionandapicalsealofthermafilobturationwithandwithoutmtaasanapicalbarrierincomparisonwithlateralcondensationtechniqueaninvitrostudy