Cargando…

ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a major public health concern, as is the associated use of opioid medications, highlighting the importance of alternative treatments, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Here, we present the final 24‐month results of the Avalon study, which investigated the use of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brooker, Charles, Russo, Marc, Cousins, Michael J., Taylor, Nathan, Holford, Lewis, Martin, Rebecca, Boesel, Tillman, Sullivan, Richard, Hanson, Erin, Gmel, Gerrit Eduard, Shariati, Nastaran Hesam, Poree, Lawrence, Parker, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13008
_version_ 1783737647206760448
author Brooker, Charles
Russo, Marc
Cousins, Michael J.
Taylor, Nathan
Holford, Lewis
Martin, Rebecca
Boesel, Tillman
Sullivan, Richard
Hanson, Erin
Gmel, Gerrit Eduard
Shariati, Nastaran Hesam
Poree, Lawrence
Parker, John
author_facet Brooker, Charles
Russo, Marc
Cousins, Michael J.
Taylor, Nathan
Holford, Lewis
Martin, Rebecca
Boesel, Tillman
Sullivan, Richard
Hanson, Erin
Gmel, Gerrit Eduard
Shariati, Nastaran Hesam
Poree, Lawrence
Parker, John
author_sort Brooker, Charles
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a major public health concern, as is the associated use of opioid medications, highlighting the importance of alternative treatments, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Here, we present the final 24‐month results of the Avalon study, which investigated the use of the first closed‐loop SCS system in patients with chronic pain. The system measures the evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) elicited by each stimulus pulse and drives a feedback loop to maintain the ECAP amplitude near constant. METHODS: Fifty patients were implanted with the Evoke system (Saluda Medical) and followed over 24‐months. Pain, quality of life (QOL), function, sleep, and medication use were collected at baseline and each scheduled visit. ECAP amplitudes and programming adjustments were also monitored. RESULTS: At 24 months, responder rates (≥ 50% pain reduction) and high responder rates (≥ 80% pain reduction) for overall pain were 89.5% and 68.4%, respectively, the latter up from 42.2% at 3 months. Significant improvements from baseline were observed in QOL, function, and sleep over the 24 months, including ≥ 80% experiencing a minimally important difference in QOL and > 50% experiencing a clinically significant improvement in sleep. At 24 months, 82.8% of patients with baseline opioid use eliminated or reduced their opioid intake. Over the course of the study, reprogramming need fell to an average of less than once a year. CONCLUSION: Over a 24‐month period, the Evoke closed‐loop SCS maintained its therapeutic efficacy despite a marked reduction in opioid use and steady decrease in the need for reprogramming.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8359972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83599722021-08-17 ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study Brooker, Charles Russo, Marc Cousins, Michael J. Taylor, Nathan Holford, Lewis Martin, Rebecca Boesel, Tillman Sullivan, Richard Hanson, Erin Gmel, Gerrit Eduard Shariati, Nastaran Hesam Poree, Lawrence Parker, John Pain Pract Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Chronic pain is a major public health concern, as is the associated use of opioid medications, highlighting the importance of alternative treatments, such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Here, we present the final 24‐month results of the Avalon study, which investigated the use of the first closed‐loop SCS system in patients with chronic pain. The system measures the evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) elicited by each stimulus pulse and drives a feedback loop to maintain the ECAP amplitude near constant. METHODS: Fifty patients were implanted with the Evoke system (Saluda Medical) and followed over 24‐months. Pain, quality of life (QOL), function, sleep, and medication use were collected at baseline and each scheduled visit. ECAP amplitudes and programming adjustments were also monitored. RESULTS: At 24 months, responder rates (≥ 50% pain reduction) and high responder rates (≥ 80% pain reduction) for overall pain were 89.5% and 68.4%, respectively, the latter up from 42.2% at 3 months. Significant improvements from baseline were observed in QOL, function, and sleep over the 24 months, including ≥ 80% experiencing a minimally important difference in QOL and > 50% experiencing a clinically significant improvement in sleep. At 24 months, 82.8% of patients with baseline opioid use eliminated or reduced their opioid intake. Over the course of the study, reprogramming need fell to an average of less than once a year. CONCLUSION: Over a 24‐month period, the Evoke closed‐loop SCS maintained its therapeutic efficacy despite a marked reduction in opioid use and steady decrease in the need for reprogramming. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-02 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8359972/ /pubmed/33768664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13008 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pain Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of World Institute of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brooker, Charles
Russo, Marc
Cousins, Michael J.
Taylor, Nathan
Holford, Lewis
Martin, Rebecca
Boesel, Tillman
Sullivan, Richard
Hanson, Erin
Gmel, Gerrit Eduard
Shariati, Nastaran Hesam
Poree, Lawrence
Parker, John
ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title_full ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title_fullStr ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title_full_unstemmed ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title_short ECAP‐Controlled Closed‐Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy and Opioid Reduction Over 24‐Months: Final Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label Avalon Study
title_sort ecap‐controlled closed‐loop spinal cord stimulation efficacy and opioid reduction over 24‐months: final results of the prospective, multicenter, open‐label avalon study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8359972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33768664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.13008
work_keys_str_mv AT brookercharles ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT russomarc ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT cousinsmichaelj ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT taylornathan ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT holfordlewis ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT martinrebecca ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT boeseltillman ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT sullivanrichard ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT hansonerin ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT gmelgerriteduard ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT shariatinastaranhesam ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT poreelawrence ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy
AT parkerjohn ecapcontrolledclosedloopspinalcordstimulationefficacyandopioidreductionover24monthsfinalresultsoftheprospectivemulticenteropenlabelavalonstudy