Cargando…

European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Characteristics of patients patch tested and diagnosed with irritant contact dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is caused by the acute locally toxic effect of a strong irritant, or the cumulative exposure to various weaker physical and/or chemical irritants. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with ICD in the population patch tested in the Euro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loman, Laura, Uter, Wolfgang, Armario‐Hita, José C., Ayala, Fabio, Balato, Anna, Ballmer‐Weber, Barbara K., Bauer, Andrea, Bircher, Andreas J., Buhl, Timo, Czarnecka‐Operacz, Magdalena, Dickel, Heinrich, Fuchs, Thomas, Giménez Arnau, Ana, John, Swen M., Kränke, Birger, Kręcisz, Beata, Mahler, Vera, Rustemeyer, Thomas, Sadowska‐Przytocka, Anna, Sánchez‐Pérez, Javier, Scherer Hofmeier, Kathrin, Schliemann, Sibylle, Simon, Dagmar, Spiewak, Radoslaw, Spring, Philip, Valiukevičienė, Skaidra, Wagner, Nicola, Weisshaar, Elke, Pesonen, Maria, Schuttelaar, Marie L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33729576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13833
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is caused by the acute locally toxic effect of a strong irritant, or the cumulative exposure to various weaker physical and/or chemical irritants. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with ICD in the population patch tested in the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA; www.essca-dc.org) database. METHODS: Data collected by the ESSCA in consecutively patch tested patients from January 2009 to December 2018 were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 68 072 patients, 8702 were diagnosed with ICD (without concomitant allergic contact dermatitis [ACD]). Hand and face were the most reported anatomical sites, and 45.7% of the ICD was occupational ICD (OICD). The highest proportions of OICD were found in metal turners, bakers, pastry cooks, and confectionery makers. Among patients diagnosed with ICD, 45% were found sensitized with no relevance for the current disease. CONCLUSIONS: The hands were mainly involved in OICD also in the subgroup of patients with contact dermatitis, in whom relevant contact sensitization had been ruled out, emphasizing the need for limiting irritant exposures. However, in difficult‐to‐treat contact dermatitis, unrecognized contact allergy, or unrecognized clinical relevance of identified allergies owing to incomplete or wrong product ingredient information must always be considered.