Cargando…

Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow

INTRODUCTION: Early‐onset fetal growth restriction is a pregnancy complication often coinciding with abnormal Doppler flow in the umbilical artery. Absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. As the optimal management of this condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gairabekova, Diana, van Rosmalen, Joost, Duvekot, Johannes J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14142
_version_ 1783737674590322688
author Gairabekova, Diana
van Rosmalen, Joost
Duvekot, Johannes J.
author_facet Gairabekova, Diana
van Rosmalen, Joost
Duvekot, Johannes J.
author_sort Gairabekova, Diana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Early‐onset fetal growth restriction is a pregnancy complication often coinciding with abnormal Doppler flow in the umbilical artery. Absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. As the optimal management of this condition is unclear, the objective of this study was to analyze the time interval from admission to delivery of pregnancies with early‐onset fetal growth restriction, while pursuing a policy of postponing delivery unless active management of labor would be required because of fetal distress or maternal condition. We also assessed short‐ and long‐term perinatal outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this historical cohort study, all pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, admitted during 2004–2015 with early‐onset fetal growth restriction were included. Pregnancies with absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow (AREDF) were compared with pregnancies with a positive end‐diastolic Doppler flow (PEDF). Time until delivery was determined and perinatal outcome was assessed for both groups. RESULTS: In our study, 111 women were allocated to the PEDF group and 109 to the AREDF group. In the AREDF group, fetal distress was more often an indication for delivery, in comparison with the PEDF group (p = .004). Median time until delivery in patients admitted between 26 and 28 weeks’ gestation was 6+5 weeks in the PEDF group and 1+4 weeks in the AREDF group (p = .001). No statistically significant difference was found between the Doppler groups in the composite adverse neonatal outcome, which includes at least one of the following outcomes: infant respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage >grade 2, periventricular leukomalacia and perinatal death (p = .63). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, comprising pregnancies with early‐onset fetal growth restriction, fetal distress was observed more frequently in the AREDF group with the consequence of delivery at an earlier stage of gestation, compared with the PEDF group. AREDF was not associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with PEDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83600922021-08-17 Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow Gairabekova, Diana van Rosmalen, Joost Duvekot, Johannes J. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Pregnancy INTRODUCTION: Early‐onset fetal growth restriction is a pregnancy complication often coinciding with abnormal Doppler flow in the umbilical artery. Absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. As the optimal management of this condition is unclear, the objective of this study was to analyze the time interval from admission to delivery of pregnancies with early‐onset fetal growth restriction, while pursuing a policy of postponing delivery unless active management of labor would be required because of fetal distress or maternal condition. We also assessed short‐ and long‐term perinatal outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this historical cohort study, all pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, admitted during 2004–2015 with early‐onset fetal growth restriction were included. Pregnancies with absent or reversed end‐diastolic flow (AREDF) were compared with pregnancies with a positive end‐diastolic Doppler flow (PEDF). Time until delivery was determined and perinatal outcome was assessed for both groups. RESULTS: In our study, 111 women were allocated to the PEDF group and 109 to the AREDF group. In the AREDF group, fetal distress was more often an indication for delivery, in comparison with the PEDF group (p = .004). Median time until delivery in patients admitted between 26 and 28 weeks’ gestation was 6+5 weeks in the PEDF group and 1+4 weeks in the AREDF group (p = .001). No statistically significant difference was found between the Doppler groups in the composite adverse neonatal outcome, which includes at least one of the following outcomes: infant respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage >grade 2, periventricular leukomalacia and perinatal death (p = .63). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, comprising pregnancies with early‐onset fetal growth restriction, fetal distress was observed more frequently in the AREDF group with the consequence of delivery at an earlier stage of gestation, compared with the PEDF group. AREDF was not associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with PEDF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-29 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8360092/ /pubmed/33690882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14142 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Pregnancy
Gairabekova, Diana
van Rosmalen, Joost
Duvekot, Johannes J.
Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title_full Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title_fullStr Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title_short Outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow
title_sort outcome of early‐onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery doppler flow
topic Pregnancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33690882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14142
work_keys_str_mv AT gairabekovadiana outcomeofearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionwithorwithoutabnormalumbilicalarterydopplerflow
AT vanrosmalenjoost outcomeofearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionwithorwithoutabnormalumbilicalarterydopplerflow
AT duvekotjohannesj outcomeofearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictionwithorwithoutabnormalumbilicalarterydopplerflow