Cargando…

Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification

BACKGROUND: We investigated effects of submacular fluid volume (SMFV) on visual outcomes following surgery for macula‐off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using automated fluid volumetric quantification with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: We analysed 127 eyes that were s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angermann, Reinhard, Mosböck, Stefan, Palme, Christoph, Ulmer, Hanno, Rauchegger, Teresa, Nowosielski, Yvonne, Bechrakis, Nikolaos E., Zehetner, Claus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13929
_version_ 1783737678079983616
author Angermann, Reinhard
Mosböck, Stefan
Palme, Christoph
Ulmer, Hanno
Rauchegger, Teresa
Nowosielski, Yvonne
Bechrakis, Nikolaos E.
Zehetner, Claus
author_facet Angermann, Reinhard
Mosböck, Stefan
Palme, Christoph
Ulmer, Hanno
Rauchegger, Teresa
Nowosielski, Yvonne
Bechrakis, Nikolaos E.
Zehetner, Claus
author_sort Angermann, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We investigated effects of submacular fluid volume (SMFV) on visual outcomes following surgery for macula‐off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using automated fluid volumetric quantification with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: We analysed 127 eyes that were surgically treated for macula‐off RRDs. We obtained preoperative images following the spectral domain (SD)‐OCT dense volume protocol, applied automated retinal segmentation and used an automated algorithm to quantify each eye's SMFV. We used multivariate models to identify various risk factors for impaired visual outcome. RESULTS: Linear regression showed that preoperative SMFV (ß = 0.013; P = .005) was significantly associated with a reduced visual outcome 12 months after the treatment of macula‐off RRDs. SMFV was negatively correlated with 12‐month postoperative (r = .311; P = .001) visual acuity (VA). The group with low preoperative SMFV (≤9.0 mm(3)) showed an increasing VA up to 12 months postoperatively (P < .001), while the VA did not increase in the group with high SMFV (>9.0 mm(3)) beyond 3 months of follow‐up. Patients with a high SMFV were 8.0 times more likely to have worse visual outcomes after 12 months of follow‐up (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: SMFV was negatively correlated with visual outcomes after the surgical treatment of macula‐off RRDs. Patients with SMFV <9.0 mm(3) 12 months after surgery had an 8.0 times greater chance for better visual recovery than patients with high preoperative SMFV. Our findings highlight the efficacy of automated SMFV quantification in predicting surgical outcomes in patients with RRDs, which could be useful in future clinical practice and the development of research models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83601072021-08-17 Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification Angermann, Reinhard Mosböck, Stefan Palme, Christoph Ulmer, Hanno Rauchegger, Teresa Nowosielski, Yvonne Bechrakis, Nikolaos E. Zehetner, Claus Clin Exp Ophthalmol ORIGINAL ARTICLES BACKGROUND: We investigated effects of submacular fluid volume (SMFV) on visual outcomes following surgery for macula‐off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using automated fluid volumetric quantification with optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: We analysed 127 eyes that were surgically treated for macula‐off RRDs. We obtained preoperative images following the spectral domain (SD)‐OCT dense volume protocol, applied automated retinal segmentation and used an automated algorithm to quantify each eye's SMFV. We used multivariate models to identify various risk factors for impaired visual outcome. RESULTS: Linear regression showed that preoperative SMFV (ß = 0.013; P = .005) was significantly associated with a reduced visual outcome 12 months after the treatment of macula‐off RRDs. SMFV was negatively correlated with 12‐month postoperative (r = .311; P = .001) visual acuity (VA). The group with low preoperative SMFV (≤9.0 mm(3)) showed an increasing VA up to 12 months postoperatively (P < .001), while the VA did not increase in the group with high SMFV (>9.0 mm(3)) beyond 3 months of follow‐up. Patients with a high SMFV were 8.0 times more likely to have worse visual outcomes after 12 months of follow‐up (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: SMFV was negatively correlated with visual outcomes after the surgical treatment of macula‐off RRDs. Patients with SMFV <9.0 mm(3) 12 months after surgery had an 8.0 times greater chance for better visual recovery than patients with high preoperative SMFV. Our findings highlight the efficacy of automated SMFV quantification in predicting surgical outcomes in patients with RRDs, which could be useful in future clinical practice and the development of research models. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2021-05-05 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8360107/ /pubmed/33864341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13929 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Angermann, Reinhard
Mosböck, Stefan
Palme, Christoph
Ulmer, Hanno
Rauchegger, Teresa
Nowosielski, Yvonne
Bechrakis, Nikolaos E.
Zehetner, Claus
Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title_full Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title_fullStr Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title_full_unstemmed Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title_short Impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
title_sort impact of submacular fluid volume on visual outcome in macula‐off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using automated optical coherence tomography volumetric quantification
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13929
work_keys_str_mv AT angermannreinhard impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT mosbockstefan impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT palmechristoph impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT ulmerhanno impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT raucheggerteresa impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT nowosielskiyvonne impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT bechrakisnikolaose impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification
AT zehetnerclaus impactofsubmacularfluidvolumeonvisualoutcomeinmaculaoffrhegmatogenousretinaldetachmentusingautomatedopticalcoherencetomographyvolumetricquantification