Cargando…

The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis

CONTEXT: Cordless gingival retraction materials are now routinely used method for gingival retraction. Although evidence-based information is available on the effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless system on the effectiveness of displacement and the periodontal health, there is a lack of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar, Nagda, Suhasini J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458115
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_324_20
_version_ 1783737701744246784
author Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar
Nagda, Suhasini J.
author_facet Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar
Nagda, Suhasini J.
author_sort Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Cordless gingival retraction materials are now routinely used method for gingival retraction. Although evidence-based information is available on the effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless system on the effectiveness of displacement and the periodontal health, there is a lack of literature regarding the effect of cordless retraction agents on enamel and dentin substrates. AIM: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the changes on the smear layer induced by the hemostatic agent and cordless retraction material at scanning electron microscopic level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ferric sulfate (15.5% m/v), expasyl, and magic foam cord were evaluated. Buccal surfaces of 16 recently extracted mandibular premolars were prepared for metal-ceramic crowns, and four teeth each were exposed to ferric sulfate solution, expasyl, and magic foam cord, respectively, for 5 min. Teeth in the control group were exposed to distilled water. The assessment of changes was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: SEM exhibited smear layer covering the dentin and occluding the dentinal tubules in the control group. Exposure to ferric sulfate caused the opening of few of the dentinal tubules whereas expasyl caused the partial removal of smear layer with dentinal plugs partially occluding the openings of most of the dentinal tubules. The specimens treated with magic foam exhibited a smear layer similar to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The smear layer was affected most with ferric sulfate solution, followed by expasyl and magic foam cord. Magic foam cord did not affect the smear layer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83602122021-08-27 The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar Nagda, Suhasini J. Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article CONTEXT: Cordless gingival retraction materials are now routinely used method for gingival retraction. Although evidence-based information is available on the effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless system on the effectiveness of displacement and the periodontal health, there is a lack of literature regarding the effect of cordless retraction agents on enamel and dentin substrates. AIM: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the changes on the smear layer induced by the hemostatic agent and cordless retraction material at scanning electron microscopic level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ferric sulfate (15.5% m/v), expasyl, and magic foam cord were evaluated. Buccal surfaces of 16 recently extracted mandibular premolars were prepared for metal-ceramic crowns, and four teeth each were exposed to ferric sulfate solution, expasyl, and magic foam cord, respectively, for 5 min. Teeth in the control group were exposed to distilled water. The assessment of changes was performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: SEM exhibited smear layer covering the dentin and occluding the dentinal tubules in the control group. Exposure to ferric sulfate caused the opening of few of the dentinal tubules whereas expasyl caused the partial removal of smear layer with dentinal plugs partially occluding the openings of most of the dentinal tubules. The specimens treated with magic foam exhibited a smear layer similar to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The smear layer was affected most with ferric sulfate solution, followed by expasyl and magic foam cord. Magic foam cord did not affect the smear layer. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8360212/ /pubmed/34458115 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_324_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahu, Shailendra Kuamar
Nagda, Suhasini J.
The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title_full The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title_fullStr The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title_short The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
title_sort influence of hemostatic agents and cordless gingival retraction materials on smear layer: an ex vivo scanning electron microscope analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34458115
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_324_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sahushailendrakuamar theinfluenceofhemostaticagentsandcordlessgingivalretractionmaterialsonsmearlayeranexvivoscanningelectronmicroscopeanalysis
AT nagdasuhasinij theinfluenceofhemostaticagentsandcordlessgingivalretractionmaterialsonsmearlayeranexvivoscanningelectronmicroscopeanalysis
AT sahushailendrakuamar influenceofhemostaticagentsandcordlessgingivalretractionmaterialsonsmearlayeranexvivoscanningelectronmicroscopeanalysis
AT nagdasuhasinij influenceofhemostaticagentsandcordlessgingivalretractionmaterialsonsmearlayeranexvivoscanningelectronmicroscopeanalysis