Cargando…

Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences

BACKGROUND: Graduate Medical Education training programs transitioned to all-virtual recruitment in 2020. Limited data have been published regarding the consequences of this transition. We aimed to understand (1) infectious diseases (ID) fellowship programs’ recruitment efforts and the effect of vir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rockney, Danica, Benson, Constance A, Blackburn, Brian G, Chirch, Lisa M, Konold, Victoria J L, Luther, Vera P, Razonable, Raymund R, Tackett, Sean, Melia, Michael T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab383
_version_ 1783737707213619200
author Rockney, Danica
Benson, Constance A
Blackburn, Brian G
Chirch, Lisa M
Konold, Victoria J L
Luther, Vera P
Razonable, Raymund R
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
author_facet Rockney, Danica
Benson, Constance A
Blackburn, Brian G
Chirch, Lisa M
Konold, Victoria J L
Luther, Vera P
Razonable, Raymund R
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
author_sort Rockney, Danica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Graduate Medical Education training programs transitioned to all-virtual recruitment in 2020. Limited data have been published regarding the consequences of this transition. We aimed to understand (1) infectious diseases (ID) fellowship programs’ recruitment efforts and the effect of virtual recruitment on application and interview numbers and (2) the number of programs to which matched applicants applied and interviewed and applicants’ perspectives on virtual recruitment. METHODS: In 2020–2021, we surveyed all US ID fellowship program directors (PDs) and matched applicants. Descriptive data analysis was performed on quantitative survey items. Free-text responses were analyzed through a quantitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: The PD response rate was 68/158 (43%); the applicant response rate was at least 23% (85/365). PDs reported a 27% increase in mean number of applications received and a 45% increase in mean number of applicants interviewed compared with the previous year. Applicants especially valued the online program structure information, PD program overview videos, didactic and curriculum content, and fellow testimonials and profiles. Most applicants preferred interviews lasting no more than 40 minutes and interview days lasting no more than 5 hours. Nearly all (60/64, 94%) PDs adequately learned about candidates; most (48/64, 75%) felt unable to showcase their program as well as when in-person. Most PDs (54/64, 84%) and applicants (56/73, 77%) want an option for virtual recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual recruitment enabled programs to accommodate more applicants and highlighted applicants’ preferences for programs’ augmented online presences and time-limited interview days. Most programs and applicants want an option for virtual interviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83602402021-08-13 Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences Rockney, Danica Benson, Constance A Blackburn, Brian G Chirch, Lisa M Konold, Victoria J L Luther, Vera P Razonable, Raymund R Tackett, Sean Melia, Michael T Open Forum Infect Dis Major Articles BACKGROUND: Graduate Medical Education training programs transitioned to all-virtual recruitment in 2020. Limited data have been published regarding the consequences of this transition. We aimed to understand (1) infectious diseases (ID) fellowship programs’ recruitment efforts and the effect of virtual recruitment on application and interview numbers and (2) the number of programs to which matched applicants applied and interviewed and applicants’ perspectives on virtual recruitment. METHODS: In 2020–2021, we surveyed all US ID fellowship program directors (PDs) and matched applicants. Descriptive data analysis was performed on quantitative survey items. Free-text responses were analyzed through a quantitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: The PD response rate was 68/158 (43%); the applicant response rate was at least 23% (85/365). PDs reported a 27% increase in mean number of applications received and a 45% increase in mean number of applicants interviewed compared with the previous year. Applicants especially valued the online program structure information, PD program overview videos, didactic and curriculum content, and fellow testimonials and profiles. Most applicants preferred interviews lasting no more than 40 minutes and interview days lasting no more than 5 hours. Nearly all (60/64, 94%) PDs adequately learned about candidates; most (48/64, 75%) felt unable to showcase their program as well as when in-person. Most PDs (54/64, 84%) and applicants (56/73, 77%) want an option for virtual recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual recruitment enabled programs to accommodate more applicants and highlighted applicants’ preferences for programs’ augmented online presences and time-limited interview days. Most programs and applicants want an option for virtual interviews. Oxford University Press 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8360240/ /pubmed/34395715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab383 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Articles
Rockney, Danica
Benson, Constance A
Blackburn, Brian G
Chirch, Lisa M
Konold, Victoria J L
Luther, Vera P
Razonable, Raymund R
Tackett, Sean
Melia, Michael T
Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title_full Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title_fullStr Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title_short Virtual Recruitment Is Here to Stay: A Survey of ID Fellowship Program Directors and Matched Applicants Regarding Their 2020 Virtual Recruitment Experiences
title_sort virtual recruitment is here to stay: a survey of id fellowship program directors and matched applicants regarding their 2020 virtual recruitment experiences
topic Major Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab383
work_keys_str_mv AT rockneydanica virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT bensonconstancea virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT blackburnbriang virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT chirchlisam virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT konoldvictoriajl virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT lutherverap virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT razonableraymundr virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT tackettsean virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences
AT meliamichaelt virtualrecruitmentisheretostayasurveyofidfellowshipprogramdirectorsandmatchedapplicantsregardingtheir2020virtualrecruitmentexperiences