Cargando…

Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Surveys play a vital role in cancer research. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of electronic surveys is crucial to improve understanding of the patient experience. However, response rates to electronic surveys are often lower compared with those of paper surveys. OBJECTIVE: The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hathaway, Cassandra A, Chavez, Melody N, Kadono, Mika, Ketcher, Dana, Rollison, Dana E, Siegel, Erin M, Peoples, Anita R, Ulrich, Cornelia M, Penedo, Frank J, Tworoger, Shelley S, Gonzalez, Brian D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156965
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30265
_version_ 1783737721093619712
author Hathaway, Cassandra A
Chavez, Melody N
Kadono, Mika
Ketcher, Dana
Rollison, Dana E
Siegel, Erin M
Peoples, Anita R
Ulrich, Cornelia M
Penedo, Frank J
Tworoger, Shelley S
Gonzalez, Brian D
author_facet Hathaway, Cassandra A
Chavez, Melody N
Kadono, Mika
Ketcher, Dana
Rollison, Dana E
Siegel, Erin M
Peoples, Anita R
Ulrich, Cornelia M
Penedo, Frank J
Tworoger, Shelley S
Gonzalez, Brian D
author_sort Hathaway, Cassandra A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surveys play a vital role in cancer research. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of electronic surveys is crucial to improve understanding of the patient experience. However, response rates to electronic surveys are often lower compared with those of paper surveys. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the best approach to improve response rates for an electronic survey administered to patients at a cancer center during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We contacted 2750 patients seen at Moffitt Cancer Center in the prior 5 years via email to complete a survey regarding their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients randomly assigned to a series of variations of prenotifications (ie, postcard, letter) or incentives (ie, small gift, modest gift card). In total, eight combinations were evaluated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to understand the level of patient understanding and burden with the survey, and quantitative analysis was used to evaluate the response rates between conditions. RESULTS: A total of 262 (9.5%) patients completed the survey and 9 participated in a qualitative interview. Interviews revealed minimal barriers in understanding or burden, which resulted in minor survey design changes. Compared to sending an email only, sending a postcard or letter prior to the email improved response rates from 3.7% to 9.8%. Similarly, inclusion of an incentive significantly increased the response rate from 5.4% to 16.7%, especially among racial (3.0% to 12.2%) and ethnic (6.4% to 21.0%) minorities, as well as among patients with low socioeconomic status (3.1% to 14.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to promote effective response rates include prenotification postcards or letters as well as monetary incentives. This work can inform future survey development to increase response rates for electronic surveys, particularly among hard-to-reach populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83603342021-08-25 Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study Hathaway, Cassandra A Chavez, Melody N Kadono, Mika Ketcher, Dana Rollison, Dana E Siegel, Erin M Peoples, Anita R Ulrich, Cornelia M Penedo, Frank J Tworoger, Shelley S Gonzalez, Brian D JMIR Cancer Original Paper BACKGROUND: Surveys play a vital role in cancer research. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of electronic surveys is crucial to improve understanding of the patient experience. However, response rates to electronic surveys are often lower compared with those of paper surveys. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the best approach to improve response rates for an electronic survey administered to patients at a cancer center during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We contacted 2750 patients seen at Moffitt Cancer Center in the prior 5 years via email to complete a survey regarding their experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, with patients randomly assigned to a series of variations of prenotifications (ie, postcard, letter) or incentives (ie, small gift, modest gift card). In total, eight combinations were evaluated. Qualitative interviews were conducted to understand the level of patient understanding and burden with the survey, and quantitative analysis was used to evaluate the response rates between conditions. RESULTS: A total of 262 (9.5%) patients completed the survey and 9 participated in a qualitative interview. Interviews revealed minimal barriers in understanding or burden, which resulted in minor survey design changes. Compared to sending an email only, sending a postcard or letter prior to the email improved response rates from 3.7% to 9.8%. Similarly, inclusion of an incentive significantly increased the response rate from 5.4% to 16.7%, especially among racial (3.0% to 12.2%) and ethnic (6.4% to 21.0%) minorities, as well as among patients with low socioeconomic status (3.1% to 14.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to promote effective response rates include prenotification postcards or letters as well as monetary incentives. This work can inform future survey development to increase response rates for electronic surveys, particularly among hard-to-reach populations. JMIR Publications 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8360334/ /pubmed/34156965 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30265 Text en ©Cassandra A Hathaway, Melody N Chavez, Mika Kadono, Dana Ketcher, Dana E Rollison, Erin M Siegel, Anita R Peoples, Cornelia M Ulrich, Frank J Penedo, Shelley S Tworoger, Brian D Gonzalez. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 06.08.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cancer, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://cancer.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hathaway, Cassandra A
Chavez, Melody N
Kadono, Mika
Ketcher, Dana
Rollison, Dana E
Siegel, Erin M
Peoples, Anita R
Ulrich, Cornelia M
Penedo, Frank J
Tworoger, Shelley S
Gonzalez, Brian D
Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_full Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_fullStr Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_short Improving Electronic Survey Response Rates Among Cancer Center Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_sort improving electronic survey response rates among cancer center patients during the covid-19 pandemic: mixed methods pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156965
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30265
work_keys_str_mv AT hathawaycassandraa improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT chavezmelodyn improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT kadonomika improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT ketcherdana improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT rollisondanae improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT siegelerinm improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT peoplesanitar improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT ulrichcorneliam improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT penedofrankj improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT tworogershelleys improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy
AT gonzalezbriand improvingelectronicsurveyresponseratesamongcancercenterpatientsduringthecovid19pandemicmixedmethodspilotstudy