Cargando…
Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study
This study explored the association between built environment and semen parameters among men who sought fertility evaluation. We used a data of 5,886 men living in the Seoul capital area whose semen was tested at a single fertility center during 2016–2018. Distance to fresh water, the coast, major r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255985 |
_version_ | 1783737755524661248 |
---|---|
author | Choe, Seung-Ah Kim, Seulgi Im, Changmin Kim, Sun-Young Wellenius, Gregory Kim, You Shin Yoon, Tae Ki Kim, Dae Keun |
author_facet | Choe, Seung-Ah Kim, Seulgi Im, Changmin Kim, Sun-Young Wellenius, Gregory Kim, You Shin Yoon, Tae Ki Kim, Dae Keun |
author_sort | Choe, Seung-Ah |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study explored the association between built environment and semen parameters among men who sought fertility evaluation. We used a data of 5,886 men living in the Seoul capital area whose semen was tested at a single fertility center during 2016–2018. Distance to fresh water, the coast, major roadways, and neighborhood greenness measured by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were evaluated. Outcome indicators were semen volume, sperm concentration, percentage of progressive motility, vitality, normal morphology, and total motile sperm count. Linear regression models were fitted to standardized values of six semen indicators. Majority of men were white-collar, clerical, and service workers. Linear associations between built environment features and semen quality indicators were not evident except for NDVI within 500 m and sperm vitality (β = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.09). The 2(nd) quartile of distance to fresh water was associated with lower progressive motility compared to the 1(st) quartile (β = −0.10; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.03). Proportion of vitality was higher among men in the 2(nd) quartile of distance to roadways than those in the 1(st) quartile (0.08; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.15). Men in the 2(nd) quartile of NDVI had higher total motile sperm count (0.09; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.17). In the multi-exposure model, the positive association between NDVI and vitality remained (0.03; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06). We observed potential evidence regarding the impact of built environment on male fertility, specifically a positive association between residential greenness and sperm vitality among men with a history of infertility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8360504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83605042021-08-13 Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study Choe, Seung-Ah Kim, Seulgi Im, Changmin Kim, Sun-Young Wellenius, Gregory Kim, You Shin Yoon, Tae Ki Kim, Dae Keun PLoS One Research Article This study explored the association between built environment and semen parameters among men who sought fertility evaluation. We used a data of 5,886 men living in the Seoul capital area whose semen was tested at a single fertility center during 2016–2018. Distance to fresh water, the coast, major roadways, and neighborhood greenness measured by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were evaluated. Outcome indicators were semen volume, sperm concentration, percentage of progressive motility, vitality, normal morphology, and total motile sperm count. Linear regression models were fitted to standardized values of six semen indicators. Majority of men were white-collar, clerical, and service workers. Linear associations between built environment features and semen quality indicators were not evident except for NDVI within 500 m and sperm vitality (β = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01, 0.09). The 2(nd) quartile of distance to fresh water was associated with lower progressive motility compared to the 1(st) quartile (β = −0.10; 95% CI: −0.17, −0.03). Proportion of vitality was higher among men in the 2(nd) quartile of distance to roadways than those in the 1(st) quartile (0.08; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.15). Men in the 2(nd) quartile of NDVI had higher total motile sperm count (0.09; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.17). In the multi-exposure model, the positive association between NDVI and vitality remained (0.03; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06). We observed potential evidence regarding the impact of built environment on male fertility, specifically a positive association between residential greenness and sperm vitality among men with a history of infertility. Public Library of Science 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8360504/ /pubmed/34383845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255985 Text en © 2021 Choe et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Choe, Seung-Ah Kim, Seulgi Im, Changmin Kim, Sun-Young Wellenius, Gregory Kim, You Shin Yoon, Tae Ki Kim, Dae Keun Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title | Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title_full | Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title_fullStr | Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title_short | Land use and semen quality: A fertility center cohort study |
title_sort | land use and semen quality: a fertility center cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choeseungah landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT kimseulgi landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT imchangmin landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT kimsunyoung landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT welleniusgregory landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT kimyoushin landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT yoontaeki landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy AT kimdaekeun landuseandsemenqualityafertilitycentercohortstudy |