Cargando…

Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies

It is of great interest and potential to discover causal relationships between pairs of exposures and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to deal with hidden confounding in observational studies. Two most popular approaches are Mendelian randomization (MR), which usually...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Yangqing, Pan, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34339418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009266
_version_ 1783737771047780352
author Deng, Yangqing
Pan, Wei
author_facet Deng, Yangqing
Pan, Wei
author_sort Deng, Yangqing
collection PubMed
description It is of great interest and potential to discover causal relationships between pairs of exposures and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to deal with hidden confounding in observational studies. Two most popular approaches are Mendelian randomization (MR), which usually use independent genetic variants/SNPs across the genome, and transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) (or their generalizations) using cis-SNPs local to a gene (or some genome-wide and likely dependent SNPs), as IVs. In spite of their many promising applications, both approaches face a major challenge: the validity of their causal conclusions depends on three critical assumptions on valid IVs, and more generally on other modeling assumptions, which however may not hold in practice. The most likely as well as challenging situation is due to the wide-spread horizontal pleiotropy, leading to two of the three IV assumptions being violated and thus to biased statistical inference. More generally, we’d like to conduct a goodness-of-fit (GOF) test to check the model being used. Although some methods have been proposed as being robust to various degrees to the violation of some modeling assumptions, they often give different and even conflicting results due to their own modeling assumptions and possibly lower statistical efficiency, imposing difficulties to the practitioner in choosing and interpreting varying results across different methods. Hence, it would help to directly test whether any assumption is violated or not. In particular, there is a lack of such tests for TWAS. We propose a new and general GOF test, called TEDE (TEsting Direct Effects), applicable to both correlated and independent SNPs/IVs (as commonly used in TWAS and MR respectively). Through simulation studies and real data examples, we demonstrate high statistical power and advantages of our new method, while confirming the frequent violation of modeling (including valid IV) assumptions in practice and thus the importance of model checking by applying such a test in MR/TWAS analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83605712021-08-13 Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies Deng, Yangqing Pan, Wei PLoS Comput Biol Research Article It is of great interest and potential to discover causal relationships between pairs of exposures and outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to deal with hidden confounding in observational studies. Two most popular approaches are Mendelian randomization (MR), which usually use independent genetic variants/SNPs across the genome, and transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) (or their generalizations) using cis-SNPs local to a gene (or some genome-wide and likely dependent SNPs), as IVs. In spite of their many promising applications, both approaches face a major challenge: the validity of their causal conclusions depends on three critical assumptions on valid IVs, and more generally on other modeling assumptions, which however may not hold in practice. The most likely as well as challenging situation is due to the wide-spread horizontal pleiotropy, leading to two of the three IV assumptions being violated and thus to biased statistical inference. More generally, we’d like to conduct a goodness-of-fit (GOF) test to check the model being used. Although some methods have been proposed as being robust to various degrees to the violation of some modeling assumptions, they often give different and even conflicting results due to their own modeling assumptions and possibly lower statistical efficiency, imposing difficulties to the practitioner in choosing and interpreting varying results across different methods. Hence, it would help to directly test whether any assumption is violated or not. In particular, there is a lack of such tests for TWAS. We propose a new and general GOF test, called TEDE (TEsting Direct Effects), applicable to both correlated and independent SNPs/IVs (as commonly used in TWAS and MR respectively). Through simulation studies and real data examples, we demonstrate high statistical power and advantages of our new method, while confirming the frequent violation of modeling (including valid IV) assumptions in practice and thus the importance of model checking by applying such a test in MR/TWAS analysis. Public Library of Science 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8360571/ /pubmed/34339418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009266 Text en © 2021 Deng, Pan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deng, Yangqing
Pan, Wei
Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title_full Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title_fullStr Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title_full_unstemmed Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title_short Model checking via testing for direct effects in Mendelian Randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
title_sort model checking via testing for direct effects in mendelian randomization and transcriptome-wide association studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34339418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009266
work_keys_str_mv AT dengyangqing modelcheckingviatestingfordirecteffectsinmendelianrandomizationandtranscriptomewideassociationstudies
AT panwei modelcheckingviatestingfordirecteffectsinmendelianrandomizationandtranscriptomewideassociationstudies