Cargando…

Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Strong relationships and effective communication between clinicians support care coordination and contribute to care quality. As a new mechanism of clinician communication, electronic consultations (e-consults) may have downstream effects on care provision and coordination. OBJECTIVE: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Ekaterina, Vimalananda, Varsha G., Orlander, Jay D., Cutrona, Sarah L., Strymish, Judith L., Bokhour, Barbara G., Rinne, Seppo T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34116530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001575
_version_ 1783737791937511424
author Anderson, Ekaterina
Vimalananda, Varsha G.
Orlander, Jay D.
Cutrona, Sarah L.
Strymish, Judith L.
Bokhour, Barbara G.
Rinne, Seppo T.
author_facet Anderson, Ekaterina
Vimalananda, Varsha G.
Orlander, Jay D.
Cutrona, Sarah L.
Strymish, Judith L.
Bokhour, Barbara G.
Rinne, Seppo T.
author_sort Anderson, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strong relationships and effective communication between clinicians support care coordination and contribute to care quality. As a new mechanism of clinician communication, electronic consultations (e-consults) may have downstream effects on care provision and coordination. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand primary care providers’ and specialists’ perspectives on how e-consults affect communication and relationships between clinicians. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. SUBJECTS: Six of 8 sites in the VISN 1 (Veterans Integrated Service Network) in New England were chosen, based on variation in organization and received e-consult volume. Seventy-three respondents, including 60 clinicians in primary care and 3 high-volume specialties (cardiology, pulmonology, and neurology) and 13 clinical leaders at the site and VISN level, were recruited. MEASURES: Participants’ perspectives on the role and impact of e-consults on communication and relationships between clinicians. RESULTS: Clinicians identified 3 types of e-consults’ social affordances: (1) e-consults were praised for allowing specialist advice to be more grounded in patient data and well-documented, but concerns about potential legal liability and increased transparency of communication to patients and others were also noted; (2) e-consults were perceived as an imperfect modality for iterative communication, especially for complex conversations requiring shared deliberation; (3) e-consults were understood as a factor influencing clinician relationships, but clinicians disagreed on whether e-consults promote or undermine relationship building. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have diverse concerns about the implications of e-consults for communication and relationships. Our findings may inform efforts to expand and improve the use of e-consults in diverse health care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83606672021-08-18 Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study Anderson, Ekaterina Vimalananda, Varsha G. Orlander, Jay D. Cutrona, Sarah L. Strymish, Judith L. Bokhour, Barbara G. Rinne, Seppo T. Med Care Original Articles BACKGROUND: Strong relationships and effective communication between clinicians support care coordination and contribute to care quality. As a new mechanism of clinician communication, electronic consultations (e-consults) may have downstream effects on care provision and coordination. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand primary care providers’ and specialists’ perspectives on how e-consults affect communication and relationships between clinicians. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. SUBJECTS: Six of 8 sites in the VISN 1 (Veterans Integrated Service Network) in New England were chosen, based on variation in organization and received e-consult volume. Seventy-three respondents, including 60 clinicians in primary care and 3 high-volume specialties (cardiology, pulmonology, and neurology) and 13 clinical leaders at the site and VISN level, were recruited. MEASURES: Participants’ perspectives on the role and impact of e-consults on communication and relationships between clinicians. RESULTS: Clinicians identified 3 types of e-consults’ social affordances: (1) e-consults were praised for allowing specialist advice to be more grounded in patient data and well-documented, but concerns about potential legal liability and increased transparency of communication to patients and others were also noted; (2) e-consults were perceived as an imperfect modality for iterative communication, especially for complex conversations requiring shared deliberation; (3) e-consults were understood as a factor influencing clinician relationships, but clinicians disagreed on whether e-consults promote or undermine relationship building. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have diverse concerns about the implications of e-consults for communication and relationships. Our findings may inform efforts to expand and improve the use of e-consults in diverse health care settings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8360667/ /pubmed/34116530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001575 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Anderson, Ekaterina
Vimalananda, Varsha G.
Orlander, Jay D.
Cutrona, Sarah L.
Strymish, Judith L.
Bokhour, Barbara G.
Rinne, Seppo T.
Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title_full Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title_short Implications of Electronic Consultations for Clinician Communication and Relationships: A Qualitative Study
title_sort implications of electronic consultations for clinician communication and relationships: a qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34116530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001575
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonekaterina implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT vimalanandavarshag implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT orlanderjayd implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT cutronasarahl implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT strymishjudithl implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT bokhourbarbarag implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy
AT rinneseppot implicationsofelectronicconsultationsforcliniciancommunicationandrelationshipsaqualitativestudy