Cargando…

COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in over 110 million people with no studies comparing pre-infection pulmonary function to post-infection. This study's aim was to compare pre-infection and post-infection pulmonary function tests (PFT) in COVID-19 infected p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Kristyn L., Helgeson, Scott A., Tatari, Mehmet M., Mallea, Jorge M., Baig, Hassan Z., Patel, Neal M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101079
_version_ 1783737797575704576
author Lewis, Kristyn L.
Helgeson, Scott A.
Tatari, Mehmet M.
Mallea, Jorge M.
Baig, Hassan Z.
Patel, Neal M.
author_facet Lewis, Kristyn L.
Helgeson, Scott A.
Tatari, Mehmet M.
Mallea, Jorge M.
Baig, Hassan Z.
Patel, Neal M.
author_sort Lewis, Kristyn L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in over 110 million people with no studies comparing pre-infection pulmonary function to post-infection. This study's aim was to compare pre-infection and post-infection pulmonary function tests (PFT) in COVID-19 infected patients to better delineate between preexisting abnormalities and effects of the virus. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-center cohort study. Patients were identified based on having COVID-19 and a pre- and post-infection PFT within one year of infection during the time period of March 1, 2020 to November 10, 2020. FINDINGS: There was a total of 80 patients, with an even split in gender; the majority were white (n = 70, 87·5%) and never smokers (n = 42, 52·5%). The majority had mild to moderate COVID-19 disease (n = 60, 75·1%) with 25 (31·2%) requiring hospitalization. There was no difference between the pre- and post-PFT data, specifically with the forced vital capacity (FVC) (p = 0·52), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)(p = 0·96), FEV1/FVC(p = 0·66), total lung capacity (TLC) (p = 0·21), and diffusion capacity (DLCO)(p = 0·88). There was no difference in the PFT when analyzed by hospitalization and disease severity. After adjusting for potential confounders, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was independently associated with a decreased FEV1 (-2·6 [95% CI, -6·7 to - 1·6] vs. -10·3 [95% CI, -17·7 to -2·9]; p = 0·03) and an increasing age (p = 0·01) and cystic fibrosis (-1·1 [95% CI, -4·5 to- 2·4] vs. -36·5 [95% CI, -52·1 to -21·0]; p < 0·01) were associated with decreasing FVC when comparing pre and post infection PFT. Only increasing age was independently associated with a reduction in TLC (p = 0·01) and DLCO (p = 0·02) before and after infection. INTERPRETATION: This study showed that there is no difference in pulmonary function as measured by PFT before and after COVID-19 infection in non-critically ill classified patients. There could be a relationship with certain underlying lung diseases (interstitial lung disease and cystic fibrosis) and decreased lung function following infection. This information should aid clinicians in their interpretation of pulmonary function tests obtained following COVID-19 infection. FUNDING: No funding was obtained for this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83607092021-08-13 COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis Lewis, Kristyn L. Helgeson, Scott A. Tatari, Mehmet M. Mallea, Jorge M. Baig, Hassan Z. Patel, Neal M. EClinicalMedicine Research Paper BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been identified in over 110 million people with no studies comparing pre-infection pulmonary function to post-infection. This study's aim was to compare pre-infection and post-infection pulmonary function tests (PFT) in COVID-19 infected patients to better delineate between preexisting abnormalities and effects of the virus. METHODS: This was a retrospective multi-center cohort study. Patients were identified based on having COVID-19 and a pre- and post-infection PFT within one year of infection during the time period of March 1, 2020 to November 10, 2020. FINDINGS: There was a total of 80 patients, with an even split in gender; the majority were white (n = 70, 87·5%) and never smokers (n = 42, 52·5%). The majority had mild to moderate COVID-19 disease (n = 60, 75·1%) with 25 (31·2%) requiring hospitalization. There was no difference between the pre- and post-PFT data, specifically with the forced vital capacity (FVC) (p = 0·52), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)(p = 0·96), FEV1/FVC(p = 0·66), total lung capacity (TLC) (p = 0·21), and diffusion capacity (DLCO)(p = 0·88). There was no difference in the PFT when analyzed by hospitalization and disease severity. After adjusting for potential confounders, interstitial lung disease (ILD) was independently associated with a decreased FEV1 (-2·6 [95% CI, -6·7 to - 1·6] vs. -10·3 [95% CI, -17·7 to -2·9]; p = 0·03) and an increasing age (p = 0·01) and cystic fibrosis (-1·1 [95% CI, -4·5 to- 2·4] vs. -36·5 [95% CI, -52·1 to -21·0]; p < 0·01) were associated with decreasing FVC when comparing pre and post infection PFT. Only increasing age was independently associated with a reduction in TLC (p = 0·01) and DLCO (p = 0·02) before and after infection. INTERPRETATION: This study showed that there is no difference in pulmonary function as measured by PFT before and after COVID-19 infection in non-critically ill classified patients. There could be a relationship with certain underlying lung diseases (interstitial lung disease and cystic fibrosis) and decreased lung function following infection. This information should aid clinicians in their interpretation of pulmonary function tests obtained following COVID-19 infection. FUNDING: No funding was obtained for this study. Elsevier 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8360709/ /pubmed/34405138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101079 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lewis, Kristyn L.
Helgeson, Scott A.
Tatari, Mehmet M.
Mallea, Jorge M.
Baig, Hassan Z.
Patel, Neal M.
COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title_full COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title_short COVID-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: A retrospective analysis
title_sort covid-19 and the effects on pulmonary function following infection: a retrospective analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34405138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101079
work_keys_str_mv AT lewiskristynl covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis
AT helgesonscotta covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis
AT tatarimehmetm covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis
AT malleajorgem covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis
AT baighassanz covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis
AT patelnealm covid19andtheeffectsonpulmonaryfunctionfollowinginfectionaretrospectiveanalysis