Cargando…
Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an es...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5 |
_version_ | 1783737825999454208 |
---|---|
author | Briestenská, Katarína Mikušová, Miriam Tomčíková, Karolína Kostolanský, František Varečková, Eva |
author_facet | Briestenská, Katarína Mikušová, Miriam Tomčíková, Karolína Kostolanský, František Varečková, Eva |
author_sort | Briestenská, Katarína |
collection | PubMed |
description | In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an essential role in microbiological research, the present study aimed to evaluate the ability to quantify bacteria by non-invasive BLI technique in comparison to standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For this purpose, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 1 × 10(5) CFU of bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae A66.1. At day 1 post-infection, the presence of S. pneumoniae in lungs was demonstrated by spread plate method and RT-qPCR, but not by in vivo BLI. However, on the second day p.i., the bioluminescent signal was already detectable, and the photon flux values positively correlated with CFU counts and RT-qPCR data within days 2–6. Though in vivo BLI is valuable research tool allowing the continuous monitoring and quantification of pneumococcal infection in living mice, it should be kept in mind that early in the infection, depending on the infective dose, the bioluminescent signal may be below the detection limit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8360831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83608312021-08-30 Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) Briestenská, Katarína Mikušová, Miriam Tomčíková, Karolína Kostolanský, František Varečková, Eva Arch Microbiol Short Communication In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an essential role in microbiological research, the present study aimed to evaluate the ability to quantify bacteria by non-invasive BLI technique in comparison to standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For this purpose, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 1 × 10(5) CFU of bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae A66.1. At day 1 post-infection, the presence of S. pneumoniae in lungs was demonstrated by spread plate method and RT-qPCR, but not by in vivo BLI. However, on the second day p.i., the bioluminescent signal was already detectable, and the photon flux values positively correlated with CFU counts and RT-qPCR data within days 2–6. Though in vivo BLI is valuable research tool allowing the continuous monitoring and quantification of pneumococcal infection in living mice, it should be kept in mind that early in the infection, depending on the infective dose, the bioluminescent signal may be below the detection limit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8360831/ /pubmed/34184097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Briestenská, Katarína Mikušová, Miriam Tomčíková, Karolína Kostolanský, František Varečková, Eva Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title | Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title_full | Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title_fullStr | Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title_short | Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) |
title_sort | quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative pcr (rt-qpcr) |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT briestenskakatarina quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr AT mikusovamiriam quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr AT tomcikovakarolina quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr AT kostolanskyfrantisek quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr AT vareckovaeva quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr |