Cargando…

Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an es...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briestenská, Katarína, Mikušová, Miriam, Tomčíková, Karolína, Kostolanský, František, Varečková, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5
_version_ 1783737825999454208
author Briestenská, Katarína
Mikušová, Miriam
Tomčíková, Karolína
Kostolanský, František
Varečková, Eva
author_facet Briestenská, Katarína
Mikušová, Miriam
Tomčíková, Karolína
Kostolanský, František
Varečková, Eva
author_sort Briestenská, Katarína
collection PubMed
description In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an essential role in microbiological research, the present study aimed to evaluate the ability to quantify bacteria by non-invasive BLI technique in comparison to standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For this purpose, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 1 × 10(5) CFU of bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae A66.1. At day 1 post-infection, the presence of S. pneumoniae in lungs was demonstrated by spread plate method and RT-qPCR, but not by in vivo BLI. However, on the second day p.i., the bioluminescent signal was already detectable, and the photon flux values positively correlated with CFU counts and RT-qPCR data within days 2–6. Though in vivo BLI is valuable research tool allowing the continuous monitoring and quantification of pneumococcal infection in living mice, it should be kept in mind that early in the infection, depending on the infective dose, the bioluminescent signal may be below the detection limit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83608312021-08-30 Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) Briestenská, Katarína Mikušová, Miriam Tomčíková, Karolína Kostolanský, František Varečková, Eva Arch Microbiol Short Communication In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) offers a unique opportunity to analyze ongoing bacterial infections qualitatively and quantitatively in intact animals over time, leading to a reduction in the number of animals needed for a study. Since accurate determination of the bacterial burden plays an essential role in microbiological research, the present study aimed to evaluate the ability to quantify bacteria by non-invasive BLI technique in comparison to standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). For this purpose, BALB/c mice were intranasally infected with 1 × 10(5) CFU of bioluminescent Streptococcus pneumoniae A66.1. At day 1 post-infection, the presence of S. pneumoniae in lungs was demonstrated by spread plate method and RT-qPCR, but not by in vivo BLI. However, on the second day p.i., the bioluminescent signal was already detectable, and the photon flux values positively correlated with CFU counts and RT-qPCR data within days 2–6. Though in vivo BLI is valuable research tool allowing the continuous monitoring and quantification of pneumococcal infection in living mice, it should be kept in mind that early in the infection, depending on the infective dose, the bioluminescent signal may be below the detection limit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-29 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8360831/ /pubmed/34184097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Short Communication
Briestenská, Katarína
Mikušová, Miriam
Tomčíková, Karolína
Kostolanský, František
Varečková, Eva
Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title_full Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title_fullStr Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title_short Quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
title_sort quantification of bacteria by in vivo bioluminescence imaging in comparison with standard spread plate method and reverse transcription quantitative pcr (rt-qpcr)
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34184097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02458-5
work_keys_str_mv AT briestenskakatarina quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr
AT mikusovamiriam quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr
AT tomcikovakarolina quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr
AT kostolanskyfrantisek quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr
AT vareckovaeva quantificationofbacteriabyinvivobioluminescenceimagingincomparisonwithstandardspreadplatemethodandreversetranscriptionquantitativepcrrtqpcr