Cargando…

Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition

Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by mea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adriaense, J. E. C., Šlipogor, V., Hintze, S., Marshall, L., Lamm, C., Bugnyar, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1
_version_ 1783737839193686016
author Adriaense, J. E. C.
Šlipogor, V.
Hintze, S.
Marshall, L.
Lamm, C.
Bugnyar, T.
author_facet Adriaense, J. E. C.
Šlipogor, V.
Hintze, S.
Marshall, L.
Lamm, C.
Bugnyar, T.
author_sort Adriaense, J. E. C.
collection PubMed
description Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by means of a judgement bias test. Demonstrators were exposed to an emotion manipulation (i.e., positive, negative, control), and observers perceived only the demonstrator’s behaviour. We predicted that the positive or negative states of the demonstrator would induce matching states in the observer, indicating emotional contagion. All subjects’ emotional states were assessed through behaviour and cognition, the latter by means of a judgement bias test. Behavioural results showed a successful emotion manipulation of demonstrators, with manipulation-congruent expressions (i.e., positive calls in the positive condition, and negative calls and pilo-erect tail in the negative condition). Observers showed no manipulation-congruent expressions, but showed more scratching and arousal after the positive manipulation. Concerning the judgement bias test, we predicted that subjects in a positive state should increase their response to ambiguous cues (i.e., optimism bias), and subjects in a negative state should decrease their response (i.e., pessimism bias). This prediction was not supported as neither demonstrators nor observers showed such bias in either manipulation. Yet, demonstrators showed an increased response to the near-positive cue, and additional analyses showed unexpected responses to the reference cues, as well as a researcher identity effect. We discuss all results combined, including recently raised validation concerns of the judgement bias test, and inherent challenges to empirically studying emotional contagion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8360889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83608892021-08-30 Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition Adriaense, J. E. C. Šlipogor, V. Hintze, S. Marshall, L. Lamm, C. Bugnyar, T. Anim Cogn Original Paper Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by means of a judgement bias test. Demonstrators were exposed to an emotion manipulation (i.e., positive, negative, control), and observers perceived only the demonstrator’s behaviour. We predicted that the positive or negative states of the demonstrator would induce matching states in the observer, indicating emotional contagion. All subjects’ emotional states were assessed through behaviour and cognition, the latter by means of a judgement bias test. Behavioural results showed a successful emotion manipulation of demonstrators, with manipulation-congruent expressions (i.e., positive calls in the positive condition, and negative calls and pilo-erect tail in the negative condition). Observers showed no manipulation-congruent expressions, but showed more scratching and arousal after the positive manipulation. Concerning the judgement bias test, we predicted that subjects in a positive state should increase their response to ambiguous cues (i.e., optimism bias), and subjects in a negative state should decrease their response (i.e., pessimism bias). This prediction was not supported as neither demonstrators nor observers showed such bias in either manipulation. Yet, demonstrators showed an increased response to the near-positive cue, and additional analyses showed unexpected responses to the reference cues, as well as a researcher identity effect. We discuss all results combined, including recently raised validation concerns of the judgement bias test, and inherent challenges to empirically studying emotional contagion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8360889/ /pubmed/33725202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Adriaense, J. E. C.
Šlipogor, V.
Hintze, S.
Marshall, L.
Lamm, C.
Bugnyar, T.
Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title_full Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title_fullStr Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title_full_unstemmed Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title_short Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
title_sort watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1
work_keys_str_mv AT adriaensejec watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition
AT slipogorv watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition
AT hintzes watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition
AT marshalll watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition
AT lammc watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition
AT bugnyart watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition