Cargando…
Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition
Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by mea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1 |
_version_ | 1783737839193686016 |
---|---|
author | Adriaense, J. E. C. Šlipogor, V. Hintze, S. Marshall, L. Lamm, C. Bugnyar, T. |
author_facet | Adriaense, J. E. C. Šlipogor, V. Hintze, S. Marshall, L. Lamm, C. Bugnyar, T. |
author_sort | Adriaense, J. E. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by means of a judgement bias test. Demonstrators were exposed to an emotion manipulation (i.e., positive, negative, control), and observers perceived only the demonstrator’s behaviour. We predicted that the positive or negative states of the demonstrator would induce matching states in the observer, indicating emotional contagion. All subjects’ emotional states were assessed through behaviour and cognition, the latter by means of a judgement bias test. Behavioural results showed a successful emotion manipulation of demonstrators, with manipulation-congruent expressions (i.e., positive calls in the positive condition, and negative calls and pilo-erect tail in the negative condition). Observers showed no manipulation-congruent expressions, but showed more scratching and arousal after the positive manipulation. Concerning the judgement bias test, we predicted that subjects in a positive state should increase their response to ambiguous cues (i.e., optimism bias), and subjects in a negative state should decrease their response (i.e., pessimism bias). This prediction was not supported as neither demonstrators nor observers showed such bias in either manipulation. Yet, demonstrators showed an increased response to the near-positive cue, and additional analyses showed unexpected responses to the reference cues, as well as a researcher identity effect. We discuss all results combined, including recently raised validation concerns of the judgement bias test, and inherent challenges to empirically studying emotional contagion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8360889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83608892021-08-30 Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition Adriaense, J. E. C. Šlipogor, V. Hintze, S. Marshall, L. Lamm, C. Bugnyar, T. Anim Cogn Original Paper Emotional contagion is suggested to facilitate group life by enhancing synchronized responses to the environment. Cooperative breeders are an example of a social system that requires such intricate coordination between individuals. Therefore, we studied emotional contagion in common marmosets by means of a judgement bias test. Demonstrators were exposed to an emotion manipulation (i.e., positive, negative, control), and observers perceived only the demonstrator’s behaviour. We predicted that the positive or negative states of the demonstrator would induce matching states in the observer, indicating emotional contagion. All subjects’ emotional states were assessed through behaviour and cognition, the latter by means of a judgement bias test. Behavioural results showed a successful emotion manipulation of demonstrators, with manipulation-congruent expressions (i.e., positive calls in the positive condition, and negative calls and pilo-erect tail in the negative condition). Observers showed no manipulation-congruent expressions, but showed more scratching and arousal after the positive manipulation. Concerning the judgement bias test, we predicted that subjects in a positive state should increase their response to ambiguous cues (i.e., optimism bias), and subjects in a negative state should decrease their response (i.e., pessimism bias). This prediction was not supported as neither demonstrators nor observers showed such bias in either manipulation. Yet, demonstrators showed an increased response to the near-positive cue, and additional analyses showed unexpected responses to the reference cues, as well as a researcher identity effect. We discuss all results combined, including recently raised validation concerns of the judgement bias test, and inherent challenges to empirically studying emotional contagion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8360889/ /pubmed/33725202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Adriaense, J. E. C. Šlipogor, V. Hintze, S. Marshall, L. Lamm, C. Bugnyar, T. Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title | Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title_full | Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title_fullStr | Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title_full_unstemmed | Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title_short | Watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
title_sort | watching others in a positive state does not induce optimism bias in common marmosets (callithrix jacchus), but leads to behaviour indicative of competition |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8360889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01497-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adriaensejec watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition AT slipogorv watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition AT hintzes watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition AT marshalll watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition AT lammc watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition AT bugnyart watchingothersinapositivestatedoesnotinduceoptimismbiasincommonmarmosetscallithrixjacchusbutleadstobehaviourindicativeofcompetition |