Cargando…
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the interobserver variability in breast tumor bed delineation using magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) at baseline and to quantify the change in tumor bed volume between pretreatment and end-of-treatment MR for patients undergoing w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100727 |
_version_ | 1783737878469148672 |
---|---|
author | Lowrey, Nicola Koch, Christine A. Purdie, Thomas Simeonov, Anna Conroy, Leigh Han, Kathy |
author_facet | Lowrey, Nicola Koch, Christine A. Purdie, Thomas Simeonov, Anna Conroy, Leigh Han, Kathy |
author_sort | Lowrey, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the interobserver variability in breast tumor bed delineation using magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) at baseline and to quantify the change in tumor bed volume between pretreatment and end-of-treatment MR for patients undergoing whole breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight patients with breast cancer planned for whole breast radiation therapy underwent CT and MR (T1, T1 fat-suppression [T1fs], and T2) simulation in the supine treatment position before radiation therapy and MR (T1, T1fs, and T2) at the end of treatment in the same position. Two observers delineated 50 tumor beds on the CT and all MR sequences and assigned cavity visualization scores to the images. The primary endpoint was interobserver variability, measured using the conformity index (CI). RESULTS: The mean cavity visualization scores at baseline were 3.14 (CT), 3.26 (T1), 3.41 (T1fs), and 3.58 (T2). The mean CIs were 0.65, 0.65, 0.72, and 0.68, respectively. T1fs significantly improved interobserver variability compared with CT, T1, or T2 (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .011, respectively). The CI for T1fs was significantly higher than T1 and T2 at the end of treatment (mean 0.72, 0.64, and 0.66, respectively; P < .001). The mean tumor bed volume on the T1fs sequence decreased from 18 cm(3) at baseline to 13 cm(3) at the end of treatment (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: T1fs reduced interobserver variability on both pre- and end-of-treatment scans and measured a reduction in tumor bed volume during whole breast radiation therapy. This rapid sequence could be easily used for adaptive boost or partial breast irradiation, especially on MR linear accelerators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8361056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83610562021-08-17 Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation Lowrey, Nicola Koch, Christine A. Purdie, Thomas Simeonov, Anna Conroy, Leigh Han, Kathy Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate the interobserver variability in breast tumor bed delineation using magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) at baseline and to quantify the change in tumor bed volume between pretreatment and end-of-treatment MR for patients undergoing whole breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight patients with breast cancer planned for whole breast radiation therapy underwent CT and MR (T1, T1 fat-suppression [T1fs], and T2) simulation in the supine treatment position before radiation therapy and MR (T1, T1fs, and T2) at the end of treatment in the same position. Two observers delineated 50 tumor beds on the CT and all MR sequences and assigned cavity visualization scores to the images. The primary endpoint was interobserver variability, measured using the conformity index (CI). RESULTS: The mean cavity visualization scores at baseline were 3.14 (CT), 3.26 (T1), 3.41 (T1fs), and 3.58 (T2). The mean CIs were 0.65, 0.65, 0.72, and 0.68, respectively. T1fs significantly improved interobserver variability compared with CT, T1, or T2 (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .011, respectively). The CI for T1fs was significantly higher than T1 and T2 at the end of treatment (mean 0.72, 0.64, and 0.66, respectively; P < .001). The mean tumor bed volume on the T1fs sequence decreased from 18 cm(3) at baseline to 13 cm(3) at the end of treatment (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: T1fs reduced interobserver variability on both pre- and end-of-treatment scans and measured a reduction in tumor bed volume during whole breast radiation therapy. This rapid sequence could be easily used for adaptive boost or partial breast irradiation, especially on MR linear accelerators. Elsevier 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8361056/ /pubmed/34409213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100727 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Lowrey, Nicola Koch, Christine A. Purdie, Thomas Simeonov, Anna Conroy, Leigh Han, Kathy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title_full | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title_fullStr | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title_short | Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging for breast tumor bed delineation: computed tomography comparison and sequence variation |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34409213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lowreynicola magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation AT kochchristinea magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation AT purdiethomas magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation AT simeonovanna magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation AT conroyleigh magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation AT hankathy magneticresonanceimagingforbreasttumorbeddelineationcomputedtomographycomparisonandsequencevariation |