Cargando…
Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate systematically previous studies on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)‐assisted diagnostic models in detecting esophageal neoplasms on endoscopic images so as to provide scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these models. METHODS: A literature search was con...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12992 |
_version_ | 1783737991255031808 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Si Min Wang, Yong Jun Zhang, Shu Tian |
author_facet | Zhang, Si Min Wang, Yong Jun Zhang, Shu Tian |
author_sort | Zhang, Si Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate systematically previous studies on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)‐assisted diagnostic models in detecting esophageal neoplasms on endoscopic images so as to provide scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these models. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies on the AI‐assisted detection of esophageal neoplasms on endoscopic images published up to December 2020. A bivariate mixed‐effects regression model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic efficacy of AI‐assisted system. Subgroup analyses and meta‐regression analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The effectiveness of AI‐assisted models was also compared with that of the endoscopists. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve regarding AI‐assisted detection of esophageal neoplasms were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92%‐96%), 85% (95% CI 73%‐92%), 6.40 (95% CI 3.38‐12.11), 0.06 (95% CI 0.04‐0.10), 98.88 (95% CI 39.45‐247.87) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95‐0.98), respectively. AI‐based models performed better than endoscopists in terms of the pooled sensitivity (94% [95% CI 84%‐98%] vs 82% [95% CI 77%‐86%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI results in increased accuracy in detecting early esophageal cancer. However, most of the included studies have a retrospective study design, thus further validation with prospective trials is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8361665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83616652021-08-17 Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Zhang, Si Min Wang, Yong Jun Zhang, Shu Tian J Dig Dis Meta Analysis OBJECTIVE: To investigate systematically previous studies on the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)‐assisted diagnostic models in detecting esophageal neoplasms on endoscopic images so as to provide scientific evidence for the effectiveness of these models. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for studies on the AI‐assisted detection of esophageal neoplasms on endoscopic images published up to December 2020. A bivariate mixed‐effects regression model was used to calculate the pooled diagnostic efficacy of AI‐assisted system. Subgroup analyses and meta‐regression analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The effectiveness of AI‐assisted models was also compared with that of the endoscopists. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve regarding AI‐assisted detection of esophageal neoplasms were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92%‐96%), 85% (95% CI 73%‐92%), 6.40 (95% CI 3.38‐12.11), 0.06 (95% CI 0.04‐0.10), 98.88 (95% CI 39.45‐247.87) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95‐0.98), respectively. AI‐based models performed better than endoscopists in terms of the pooled sensitivity (94% [95% CI 84%‐98%] vs 82% [95% CI 77%‐86%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AI results in increased accuracy in detecting early esophageal cancer. However, most of the included studies have a retrospective study design, thus further validation with prospective trials is required. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2021-06-18 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8361665/ /pubmed/33871932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12992 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Digestive Diseases published by Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Meta Analysis Zhang, Si Min Wang, Yong Jun Zhang, Shu Tian Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of artificial intelligence‐assisted detection of esophageal cancer and neoplasms on endoscopic images: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Meta Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangsimin accuracyofartificialintelligenceassisteddetectionofesophagealcancerandneoplasmsonendoscopicimagesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyongjun accuracyofartificialintelligenceassisteddetectionofesophagealcancerandneoplasmsonendoscopicimagesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangshutian accuracyofartificialintelligenceassisteddetectionofesophagealcancerandneoplasmsonendoscopicimagesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |