Cargando…

Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bian, Zheng, Qu, Xiaoxian, Ying, Hao, Liu, Xiaohua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359
_version_ 1783737994784538624
author Bian, Zheng
Qu, Xiaoxian
Ying, Hao
Liu, Xiaohua
author_facet Bian, Zheng
Qu, Xiaoxian
Ying, Hao
Liu, Xiaohua
author_sort Bian, Zheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the national COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China and the incidence of preterm birth. SETTING: Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai China. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton deliveries abstracted from electronic medical record between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth rate. RESULTS: Data on 164 107 singleton deliveries were available. COVID-19 mitigation measures were consistently associated with significant reductions in preterm birth in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month time windows after implementation (+2 months, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; +3 months, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94; +4 months, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; +5 months, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). These reductions in preterm birth were obvious across various degrees of prematurity, but were statistically significant only in moderate-to-late preterm birth (32 complete weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) subgroup. The preterm birth difference disappeared gradually after various restrictions were removed (7th–12th month of 2020, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11). There was no difference in stillbirth rate across the study time window. CONCLUSION: Substantial decreases in preterm birth rates were observed following implementation of the national COVID-19 mitigation measures in China. Further study is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with this observation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8361681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83616812021-08-13 Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? Bian, Zheng Qu, Xiaoxian Ying, Hao Liu, Xiaohua BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the national COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China and the incidence of preterm birth. SETTING: Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai China. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton deliveries abstracted from electronic medical record between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth rate. RESULTS: Data on 164 107 singleton deliveries were available. COVID-19 mitigation measures were consistently associated with significant reductions in preterm birth in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month time windows after implementation (+2 months, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; +3 months, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94; +4 months, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; +5 months, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). These reductions in preterm birth were obvious across various degrees of prematurity, but were statistically significant only in moderate-to-late preterm birth (32 complete weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) subgroup. The preterm birth difference disappeared gradually after various restrictions were removed (7th–12th month of 2020, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11). There was no difference in stillbirth rate across the study time window. CONCLUSION: Substantial decreases in preterm birth rates were observed following implementation of the national COVID-19 mitigation measures in China. Further study is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with this observation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8361681/ /pubmed/34385161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Bian, Zheng
Qu, Xiaoxian
Ying, Hao
Liu, Xiaohua
Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title_full Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title_fullStr Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title_full_unstemmed Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title_short Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
title_sort are covid-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in china?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359
work_keys_str_mv AT bianzheng arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina
AT quxiaoxian arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina
AT yinghao arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina
AT liuxiaohua arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina