Cargando…
Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China?
OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359 |
_version_ | 1783737994784538624 |
---|---|
author | Bian, Zheng Qu, Xiaoxian Ying, Hao Liu, Xiaohua |
author_facet | Bian, Zheng Qu, Xiaoxian Ying, Hao Liu, Xiaohua |
author_sort | Bian, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the national COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China and the incidence of preterm birth. SETTING: Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai China. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton deliveries abstracted from electronic medical record between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth rate. RESULTS: Data on 164 107 singleton deliveries were available. COVID-19 mitigation measures were consistently associated with significant reductions in preterm birth in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month time windows after implementation (+2 months, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; +3 months, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94; +4 months, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; +5 months, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). These reductions in preterm birth were obvious across various degrees of prematurity, but were statistically significant only in moderate-to-late preterm birth (32 complete weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) subgroup. The preterm birth difference disappeared gradually after various restrictions were removed (7th–12th month of 2020, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11). There was no difference in stillbirth rate across the study time window. CONCLUSION: Substantial decreases in preterm birth rates were observed following implementation of the national COVID-19 mitigation measures in China. Further study is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with this observation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8361681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83616812021-08-13 Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? Bian, Zheng Qu, Xiaoxian Ying, Hao Liu, Xiaohua BMJ Glob Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality globally. We aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China on 23 January 2020 on the incidence of preterm birth in our institution. DESIGN: Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between the national COVID-19 mitigation measures implemented in China and the incidence of preterm birth. SETTING: Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai China. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton deliveries abstracted from electronic medical record between 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm birth rate. RESULTS: Data on 164 107 singleton deliveries were available. COVID-19 mitigation measures were consistently associated with significant reductions in preterm birth in the 2-month, 3-month, 4-month, 5-month time windows after implementation (+2 months, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.94; +3 months, OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94; +4 months, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; +5 months, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93). These reductions in preterm birth were obvious across various degrees of prematurity, but were statistically significant only in moderate-to-late preterm birth (32 complete weeks to 36 weeks and 6 days) subgroup. The preterm birth difference disappeared gradually after various restrictions were removed (7th–12th month of 2020, OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.11). There was no difference in stillbirth rate across the study time window. CONCLUSION: Substantial decreases in preterm birth rates were observed following implementation of the national COVID-19 mitigation measures in China. Further study is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms associated with this observation. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8361681/ /pubmed/34385161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bian, Zheng Qu, Xiaoxian Ying, Hao Liu, Xiaohua Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title | Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title_full | Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title_fullStr | Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title_short | Are COVID-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in China? |
title_sort | are covid-19 mitigation measures reducing preterm birth rate in china? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bianzheng arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina AT quxiaoxian arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina AT yinghao arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina AT liuxiaohua arecovid19mitigationmeasuresreducingpretermbirthrateinchina |