Cargando…
Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics
Treatment benefit in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with high‐risk cytogenetics remains suboptimal. The phase 3 ICARIA‐MM trial (NCT02990338) showed that isatuximab plus pomalidomide–dexamethasone prolongs median progression‐free survival (mPFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). This s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17499 |
_version_ | 1783738006824288256 |
---|---|
author | Harrison, Simon J. Perrot, Aurore Alegre, Adrian Simpson, David Wang, Ming Chung Spencer, Andrew Delimpasi, Sosana Hulin, Cyrille Sunami, Kazutaka Facon, Thierry Vlummens, Philip Yong, Kwee Campana, Frank Inchauspé, Marlène Macé, Sandrine Risse, Marie‐Laure van de Velde, Helgi Richardson, Paul |
author_facet | Harrison, Simon J. Perrot, Aurore Alegre, Adrian Simpson, David Wang, Ming Chung Spencer, Andrew Delimpasi, Sosana Hulin, Cyrille Sunami, Kazutaka Facon, Thierry Vlummens, Philip Yong, Kwee Campana, Frank Inchauspé, Marlène Macé, Sandrine Risse, Marie‐Laure van de Velde, Helgi Richardson, Paul |
author_sort | Harrison, Simon J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment benefit in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with high‐risk cytogenetics remains suboptimal. The phase 3 ICARIA‐MM trial (NCT02990338) showed that isatuximab plus pomalidomide–dexamethasone prolongs median progression‐free survival (mPFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). This subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM compared the benefit of isatuximab in high‐risk [defined by the presence of del(17p), t(4;14) or t(14;16)] versus standard‐risk patients. The efficacy of isatuximab in patients with gain(1q21) abnormality was also assessed in a retrospective subgroup analysis. In ICARIA‐MM, 307 patients received isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone (n = 154) or pomalidomide–dexamethasone (n = 153). Isatuximab (10 mg/kg intravenously) was given weekly in the first 28‐day cycle, and every other week thereafter. Standard pomalidomide–dexamethasone doses were given. Isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone improved mPFS (7·5 vs 3·7 months; HR, 0·66; 95% CI, 0·33–1·28) and overall response rate (ORR, 50·0% vs 16·7%) in high‐risk patients. In patients with isolated gain(1q21), isatuximab addition improved mPFS (11·2 vs 4·6 months; HR, 0·50; 95% CI, 0·28–0·88) and ORR (53·6% vs 27·6%). More grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in high‐risk patients receiving isatuximab (95·7%) versus the control group (67·6%); however, isatuximab did not increase events leading to discontinuation or treatment‐related mortality. Isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone provides a consistent benefit over pomalidomide–dexamethasone treatment in RRMM patients regardless of cytogenetic risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8361732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83617322021-08-17 Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics Harrison, Simon J. Perrot, Aurore Alegre, Adrian Simpson, David Wang, Ming Chung Spencer, Andrew Delimpasi, Sosana Hulin, Cyrille Sunami, Kazutaka Facon, Thierry Vlummens, Philip Yong, Kwee Campana, Frank Inchauspé, Marlène Macé, Sandrine Risse, Marie‐Laure van de Velde, Helgi Richardson, Paul Br J Haematol Haematological malignancy ‐ Clinical Treatment benefit in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with high‐risk cytogenetics remains suboptimal. The phase 3 ICARIA‐MM trial (NCT02990338) showed that isatuximab plus pomalidomide–dexamethasone prolongs median progression‐free survival (mPFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM). This subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM compared the benefit of isatuximab in high‐risk [defined by the presence of del(17p), t(4;14) or t(14;16)] versus standard‐risk patients. The efficacy of isatuximab in patients with gain(1q21) abnormality was also assessed in a retrospective subgroup analysis. In ICARIA‐MM, 307 patients received isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone (n = 154) or pomalidomide–dexamethasone (n = 153). Isatuximab (10 mg/kg intravenously) was given weekly in the first 28‐day cycle, and every other week thereafter. Standard pomalidomide–dexamethasone doses were given. Isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone improved mPFS (7·5 vs 3·7 months; HR, 0·66; 95% CI, 0·33–1·28) and overall response rate (ORR, 50·0% vs 16·7%) in high‐risk patients. In patients with isolated gain(1q21), isatuximab addition improved mPFS (11·2 vs 4·6 months; HR, 0·50; 95% CI, 0·28–0·88) and ORR (53·6% vs 27·6%). More grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in high‐risk patients receiving isatuximab (95·7%) versus the control group (67·6%); however, isatuximab did not increase events leading to discontinuation or treatment‐related mortality. Isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone provides a consistent benefit over pomalidomide–dexamethasone treatment in RRMM patients regardless of cytogenetic risk. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-25 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8361732/ /pubmed/34036560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17499 Text en © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Haematological malignancy ‐ Clinical Harrison, Simon J. Perrot, Aurore Alegre, Adrian Simpson, David Wang, Ming Chung Spencer, Andrew Delimpasi, Sosana Hulin, Cyrille Sunami, Kazutaka Facon, Thierry Vlummens, Philip Yong, Kwee Campana, Frank Inchauspé, Marlène Macé, Sandrine Risse, Marie‐Laure van de Velde, Helgi Richardson, Paul Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title | Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title_full | Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title_fullStr | Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title_short | Subgroup analysis of ICARIA‐MM study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
title_sort | subgroup analysis of icaria‐mm study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics |
topic | Haematological malignancy ‐ Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.17499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisonsimonj subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT perrotaurore subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT alegreadrian subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT simpsondavid subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT wangmingchung subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT spencerandrew subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT delimpasisosana subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT hulincyrille subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT sunamikazutaka subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT faconthierry subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT vlummensphilip subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT yongkwee subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT campanafrank subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT inchauspemarlene subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT macesandrine subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT rissemarielaure subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT vandeveldehelgi subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics AT richardsonpaul subgroupanalysisoficariammstudyinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomapatientswithhighriskcytogenetics |