Cargando…

Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world

External beam radiotherapy is an effective curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide. However, conventionally fractionated courses of curative external beam radiotherapy are usually 8–9 weeks long, resulting in a substantial burden to patients a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Michael, Gouveia, Andre G., Cury, Fabio L., Moideen, Nikitha, Bratti, Vanessa F., Patrocinio, Horacio, Berlin, Alejandro, Mendez, Lucas C., Moraes, Fabio Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00498-6
_version_ 1783738026167369728
author Yan, Michael
Gouveia, Andre G.
Cury, Fabio L.
Moideen, Nikitha
Bratti, Vanessa F.
Patrocinio, Horacio
Berlin, Alejandro
Mendez, Lucas C.
Moraes, Fabio Y.
author_facet Yan, Michael
Gouveia, Andre G.
Cury, Fabio L.
Moideen, Nikitha
Bratti, Vanessa F.
Patrocinio, Horacio
Berlin, Alejandro
Mendez, Lucas C.
Moraes, Fabio Y.
author_sort Yan, Michael
collection PubMed
description External beam radiotherapy is an effective curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide. However, conventionally fractionated courses of curative external beam radiotherapy are usually 8–9 weeks long, resulting in a substantial burden to patients and the health-care system. This problem is exacerbated in low-income and middle-income countries where health-care resources might be scarce and patient funds limited. Trials have shown a clinical equipoise between hypofractionated schedules of radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated treatments, with the advantage of drastically shortening treatment durations with the use of hypofractionation. The hypofractionated schedules are supported by modern consensus guidelines for implementation in clinical practice. Furthermore, several economic evaluations have shown improved cost effectiveness of hypofractionated therapy compared with conventional schedules. However, these techniques demand complex infrastructure and advanced personnel training. Thus, a number of practical considerations must be borne in mind when implementing hypofractionation in low-income and middle-income countries, but the potential gain in the treatment of this patient population is substantial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8361822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83618222021-08-13 Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world Yan, Michael Gouveia, Andre G. Cury, Fabio L. Moideen, Nikitha Bratti, Vanessa F. Patrocinio, Horacio Berlin, Alejandro Mendez, Lucas C. Moraes, Fabio Y. Nat Rev Urol Review Article External beam radiotherapy is an effective curative treatment option for localized prostate cancer, the most common cancer in men worldwide. However, conventionally fractionated courses of curative external beam radiotherapy are usually 8–9 weeks long, resulting in a substantial burden to patients and the health-care system. This problem is exacerbated in low-income and middle-income countries where health-care resources might be scarce and patient funds limited. Trials have shown a clinical equipoise between hypofractionated schedules of radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated treatments, with the advantage of drastically shortening treatment durations with the use of hypofractionation. The hypofractionated schedules are supported by modern consensus guidelines for implementation in clinical practice. Furthermore, several economic evaluations have shown improved cost effectiveness of hypofractionated therapy compared with conventional schedules. However, these techniques demand complex infrastructure and advanced personnel training. Thus, a number of practical considerations must be borne in mind when implementing hypofractionation in low-income and middle-income countries, but the potential gain in the treatment of this patient population is substantial. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-13 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8361822/ /pubmed/34389825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00498-6 Text en © Springer Nature Limited 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yan, Michael
Gouveia, Andre G.
Cury, Fabio L.
Moideen, Nikitha
Bratti, Vanessa F.
Patrocinio, Horacio
Berlin, Alejandro
Mendez, Lucas C.
Moraes, Fabio Y.
Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title_full Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title_fullStr Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title_full_unstemmed Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title_short Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
title_sort practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8361822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34389825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00498-6
work_keys_str_mv AT yanmichael practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT gouveiaandreg practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT curyfabiol practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT moideennikitha practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT brattivanessaf practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT patrociniohoracio practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT berlinalejandro practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT mendezlucasc practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld
AT moraesfabioy practicalconsiderationsforprostatehypofractionationinthedevelopingworld