Cargando…
Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present a biomathematical model based on the dynamics of cell populations to predict the tolerability/intolerability of mucosal toxicity in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our model is based on the dynamics of proliferative and functional c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14834 |
_version_ | 1783738070515843072 |
---|---|
author | Pardo‐Montero, Juan Parga‐Pazos, Martín Fenwick, John D. |
author_facet | Pardo‐Montero, Juan Parga‐Pazos, Martín Fenwick, John D. |
author_sort | Pardo‐Montero, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present a biomathematical model based on the dynamics of cell populations to predict the tolerability/intolerability of mucosal toxicity in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our model is based on the dynamics of proliferative and functional cell populations in irradiated mucosa, and incorporates the three As: Accelerated proliferation, loss of Asymmetric proliferation, and Abortive divisions. The model consists of a set of delay differential equations, and tolerability is based on the depletion of functional cells during treatment. We calculate the sensitivity (sen) and specificity (spe) of the model in a dataset of 108 radiotherapy schedules, and compare the results with those obtained with three phenomenological classification models, two based on a biologically effective dose (BED) function describing the tolerability boundary (Fowler and Fenwick) and one based on an equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD(2)) boundary (Strigari). We also perform a machine learning‐like cross‐validation of all the models, splitting the database in two, one for training and one for validation. RESULTS: When fitting our model to the whole dataset, we obtain predictive values (sen + spe) up to 1.824. The predictive value of our model is very similar to that of the phenomenological models of Fowler (1.785), Fenwick (1.806), and Strigari (1.774). When performing a k = 2 cross‐validation, the specificity and sensitivity in the validation dataset decrease for all models, from ˜1.82 to ˜1.55–1.63. For Fowler, the worsening is higher, down to 1.49. CONCLUSIONS: Our model has proved useful to predict the tolerability/intolerability of a dataset of 108 schedules. As the model is more mechanistic than other available models, it could prove helpful when designing unconventional dose fractionations, schedules not covered by datasets to which phenomenological models of toxicity have been fitted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8362027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83620272021-08-17 Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics Pardo‐Montero, Juan Parga‐Pazos, Martín Fenwick, John D. Med Phys BIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND RESPONSE PREDICTION PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present a biomathematical model based on the dynamics of cell populations to predict the tolerability/intolerability of mucosal toxicity in head‐and‐neck radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our model is based on the dynamics of proliferative and functional cell populations in irradiated mucosa, and incorporates the three As: Accelerated proliferation, loss of Asymmetric proliferation, and Abortive divisions. The model consists of a set of delay differential equations, and tolerability is based on the depletion of functional cells during treatment. We calculate the sensitivity (sen) and specificity (spe) of the model in a dataset of 108 radiotherapy schedules, and compare the results with those obtained with three phenomenological classification models, two based on a biologically effective dose (BED) function describing the tolerability boundary (Fowler and Fenwick) and one based on an equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD(2)) boundary (Strigari). We also perform a machine learning‐like cross‐validation of all the models, splitting the database in two, one for training and one for validation. RESULTS: When fitting our model to the whole dataset, we obtain predictive values (sen + spe) up to 1.824. The predictive value of our model is very similar to that of the phenomenological models of Fowler (1.785), Fenwick (1.806), and Strigari (1.774). When performing a k = 2 cross‐validation, the specificity and sensitivity in the validation dataset decrease for all models, from ˜1.82 to ˜1.55–1.63. For Fowler, the worsening is higher, down to 1.49. CONCLUSIONS: Our model has proved useful to predict the tolerability/intolerability of a dataset of 108 schedules. As the model is more mechanistic than other available models, it could prove helpful when designing unconventional dose fractionations, schedules not covered by datasets to which phenomenological models of toxicity have been fitted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-09 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8362027/ /pubmed/33704792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14834 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | BIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND RESPONSE PREDICTION Pardo‐Montero, Juan Parga‐Pazos, Martín Fenwick, John D. Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title | Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title_full | Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title_fullStr | Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title_short | Classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
title_sort | classification of tolerable/intolerable mucosal toxicity of head‐and‐neck radiotherapy schedules with a biomathematical model of cell dynamics |
topic | BIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND RESPONSE PREDICTION |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.14834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pardomonterojuan classificationoftolerableintolerablemucosaltoxicityofheadandneckradiotherapyscheduleswithabiomathematicalmodelofcelldynamics AT pargapazosmartin classificationoftolerableintolerablemucosaltoxicityofheadandneckradiotherapyscheduleswithabiomathematicalmodelofcelldynamics AT fenwickjohnd classificationoftolerableintolerablemucosaltoxicityofheadandneckradiotherapyscheduleswithabiomathematicalmodelofcelldynamics |