Cargando…

Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow

PREMISE: Pollinator foraging behavior can influence pollen dispersal and gene flow. In many plant species a pollinator trips a flower by applying pressure to release its sexual organs. We propose that differences in tripping rate among grooming pollinators could generate distinct pollen deposition c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel, Cardoso Castro, Cibele, Flick, Andrew, Sullivan, Michael, Riday, Heathcliffe, Clayton, Murray K., Brunet, Johanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1683
_version_ 1783738078945345536
author Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel
Cardoso Castro, Cibele
Flick, Andrew
Sullivan, Michael
Riday, Heathcliffe
Clayton, Murray K.
Brunet, Johanne
author_facet Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel
Cardoso Castro, Cibele
Flick, Andrew
Sullivan, Michael
Riday, Heathcliffe
Clayton, Murray K.
Brunet, Johanne
author_sort Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description PREMISE: Pollinator foraging behavior can influence pollen dispersal and gene flow. In many plant species a pollinator trips a flower by applying pressure to release its sexual organs. We propose that differences in tripping rate among grooming pollinators could generate distinct pollen deposition curves, the pattern of pollen deposition over successive flowers visited. This study compares the pollen deposition curves of two grooming pollinators, a social bumble bee and a solitary leafcutting bee, with distinct tripping rates on Medicago sativa flowers. We predict a steeper deposition curve for pollen moved by leafcutting bees, the pollinator with the higher tripping rate. METHODS: Medicago sativa plants carrying a gene (GUS) whose product is easily detected by staining, were used as pollen donors. After visiting the GUS plants, a bee was released on a linear array of conventional M. sativa plants. The number of GUS pollen grains deposited over successive flowers visited or over cumulative distances was examined. Distinct mixed effect Poisson regression models, illustrating different rates of decay in pollen deposition, were fitted to the pollen data for each bee species. RESULTS: Pollen decay was steeper for leafcutting bees relative to bumble bees for both models of flowers visited and cumulative distance, as predicted by their higher tripping rate. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a difference in pollen deposition curves between two bee species, both grooming pollinators. Such differences could lead to distinct impacts of bee species on gene flow, genetic differentiation, introgression, and ultimately speciation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8362063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83620632021-08-17 Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel Cardoso Castro, Cibele Flick, Andrew Sullivan, Michael Riday, Heathcliffe Clayton, Murray K. Brunet, Johanne Am J Bot Research Articles PREMISE: Pollinator foraging behavior can influence pollen dispersal and gene flow. In many plant species a pollinator trips a flower by applying pressure to release its sexual organs. We propose that differences in tripping rate among grooming pollinators could generate distinct pollen deposition curves, the pattern of pollen deposition over successive flowers visited. This study compares the pollen deposition curves of two grooming pollinators, a social bumble bee and a solitary leafcutting bee, with distinct tripping rates on Medicago sativa flowers. We predict a steeper deposition curve for pollen moved by leafcutting bees, the pollinator with the higher tripping rate. METHODS: Medicago sativa plants carrying a gene (GUS) whose product is easily detected by staining, were used as pollen donors. After visiting the GUS plants, a bee was released on a linear array of conventional M. sativa plants. The number of GUS pollen grains deposited over successive flowers visited or over cumulative distances was examined. Distinct mixed effect Poisson regression models, illustrating different rates of decay in pollen deposition, were fitted to the pollen data for each bee species. RESULTS: Pollen decay was steeper for leafcutting bees relative to bumble bees for both models of flowers visited and cumulative distance, as predicted by their higher tripping rate. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a difference in pollen deposition curves between two bee species, both grooming pollinators. Such differences could lead to distinct impacts of bee species on gene flow, genetic differentiation, introgression, and ultimately speciation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-10 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8362063/ /pubmed/34114219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1683 Text en © 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Botany published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Santa‐Martinez, Emmanuel
Cardoso Castro, Cibele
Flick, Andrew
Sullivan, Michael
Riday, Heathcliffe
Clayton, Murray K.
Brunet, Johanne
Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title_full Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title_fullStr Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title_full_unstemmed Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title_short Bee species visiting Medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
title_sort bee species visiting medicago sativa differ in pollen deposition curves with consequences for gene flow
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34114219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1683
work_keys_str_mv AT santamartinezemmanuel beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT cardosocastrocibele beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT flickandrew beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT sullivanmichael beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT ridayheathcliffe beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT claytonmurrayk beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow
AT brunetjohanne beespeciesvisitingmedicagosativadifferinpollendepositioncurveswithconsequencesforgeneflow