Cargando…

Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep

Pathogenic E. coli are among the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens on large-scale sheep farms in China. Antibiotic use in wool sheep production is a risk factor for promoting the emergence of resistant E. coli. To reveal the differences of E. coli populations in sheep from different farmi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xueliang, Lv, Yunyang, Adam, Fathalrhman Eisa Addoma, Xie, Qingfang, Wang, Bin, Bai, Xindong, Wang, Xiaoyuan, Shan, Honghu, Wang, Xinglong, Liu, Haijin, Dang, Ruyi, Wang, Juan, Yang, Zengqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699927
_version_ 1783738086017990656
author Zhao, Xueliang
Lv, Yunyang
Adam, Fathalrhman Eisa Addoma
Xie, Qingfang
Wang, Bin
Bai, Xindong
Wang, Xiaoyuan
Shan, Honghu
Wang, Xinglong
Liu, Haijin
Dang, Ruyi
Wang, Juan
Yang, Zengqi
author_facet Zhao, Xueliang
Lv, Yunyang
Adam, Fathalrhman Eisa Addoma
Xie, Qingfang
Wang, Bin
Bai, Xindong
Wang, Xiaoyuan
Shan, Honghu
Wang, Xinglong
Liu, Haijin
Dang, Ruyi
Wang, Juan
Yang, Zengqi
author_sort Zhao, Xueliang
collection PubMed
description Pathogenic E. coli are among the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens on large-scale sheep farms in China. Antibiotic use in wool sheep production is a risk factor for promoting the emergence of resistant E. coli. To reveal the differences of E. coli populations in sheep from different farming systems the antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, biofilm formation, and phylogroups of 500 E. coli isolates obtained between September 2019 and December 2020 in northwest China from diarrheic infections of intensive farming and free-range sheep were analyzed. The antimicrobial susceptibility test for 12 classes of antimicrobial agents was determined using the broth microdilution susceptibility method, and PCR was used to detect the differences in virulence genes and phylogroups. Additionally, biofilm formation was determined using microtiter plate and slide agglutination methods. Among the 500 E. coli isolates, the majority of the isolates were multidrug resistant (75.4%) and carried at least one virulence gene (94.8%). We observed that 412 (82.4%), 360 (72.0%), and 266 (53.2%) are found to be resistant to sulfisoxazole, florfenicol, and tetracyclines, respectively. Resistance was also observed to mequindox (46.8%), ampicillin (43.6%), spectinomycin (38.6%), enrofloxacin (34.2%), ceftiofur (21.0%), gentamycin (20.4%), ceftazidime (17.8%), and polymyxin B (7.8%) but no resistance was found to meropenem. These results showed that strains from free-range subjects had fewer antibiotic resistance strains rather than sheep that were intensively farmed (P < 0.05). We observed fifteen virulence genes, of which etrA (n = 401, 80.2%) is the most common. In addition, EAEC (86.4%) is dominant among free-range sheep and EHEC (80.1%) is dominant among intensive farming. Among all virulence genes, the strongest correlation was found between etrA and papC gene (P < 0.001, OR = 455.68). Similarly, the strongest correlation was also found between eltA and sulfisoxazole (P < 0.001, OR = 877). Furthermore, the majority of the E. coli isolates belonged to phylogroup B1 (50.6%), followed by phylogroup C (20.6%), A (7.4%), E (7.4%), D (5.8%), B2 (1.6%), and F (1%). Interestingly, phylogroup B2 and D were all distributed in intensive farms. In addition, 33 (6.6%), 373 (74.6%), and 94 (18.8%) showed moderate, weak, and no connection biofilm formation ability, respectively. These data uncovered that wool sheep serve as a reservoir of pathogenic E. coli harboring multiple resistance phenotypes and virulence genes. The overlapping virulence-associated traits between IPEC and ExPEC indicated the zoonotic potential and safety threats of sheep food products. It is urgent to improve the proper use of antimicrobials in China as well as other countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8362090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83620902021-08-14 Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep Zhao, Xueliang Lv, Yunyang Adam, Fathalrhman Eisa Addoma Xie, Qingfang Wang, Bin Bai, Xindong Wang, Xiaoyuan Shan, Honghu Wang, Xinglong Liu, Haijin Dang, Ruyi Wang, Juan Yang, Zengqi Front Microbiol Microbiology Pathogenic E. coli are among the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens on large-scale sheep farms in China. Antibiotic use in wool sheep production is a risk factor for promoting the emergence of resistant E. coli. To reveal the differences of E. coli populations in sheep from different farming systems the antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, biofilm formation, and phylogroups of 500 E. coli isolates obtained between September 2019 and December 2020 in northwest China from diarrheic infections of intensive farming and free-range sheep were analyzed. The antimicrobial susceptibility test for 12 classes of antimicrobial agents was determined using the broth microdilution susceptibility method, and PCR was used to detect the differences in virulence genes and phylogroups. Additionally, biofilm formation was determined using microtiter plate and slide agglutination methods. Among the 500 E. coli isolates, the majority of the isolates were multidrug resistant (75.4%) and carried at least one virulence gene (94.8%). We observed that 412 (82.4%), 360 (72.0%), and 266 (53.2%) are found to be resistant to sulfisoxazole, florfenicol, and tetracyclines, respectively. Resistance was also observed to mequindox (46.8%), ampicillin (43.6%), spectinomycin (38.6%), enrofloxacin (34.2%), ceftiofur (21.0%), gentamycin (20.4%), ceftazidime (17.8%), and polymyxin B (7.8%) but no resistance was found to meropenem. These results showed that strains from free-range subjects had fewer antibiotic resistance strains rather than sheep that were intensively farmed (P < 0.05). We observed fifteen virulence genes, of which etrA (n = 401, 80.2%) is the most common. In addition, EAEC (86.4%) is dominant among free-range sheep and EHEC (80.1%) is dominant among intensive farming. Among all virulence genes, the strongest correlation was found between etrA and papC gene (P < 0.001, OR = 455.68). Similarly, the strongest correlation was also found between eltA and sulfisoxazole (P < 0.001, OR = 877). Furthermore, the majority of the E. coli isolates belonged to phylogroup B1 (50.6%), followed by phylogroup C (20.6%), A (7.4%), E (7.4%), D (5.8%), B2 (1.6%), and F (1%). Interestingly, phylogroup B2 and D were all distributed in intensive farms. In addition, 33 (6.6%), 373 (74.6%), and 94 (18.8%) showed moderate, weak, and no connection biofilm formation ability, respectively. These data uncovered that wool sheep serve as a reservoir of pathogenic E. coli harboring multiple resistance phenotypes and virulence genes. The overlapping virulence-associated traits between IPEC and ExPEC indicated the zoonotic potential and safety threats of sheep food products. It is urgent to improve the proper use of antimicrobials in China as well as other countries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8362090/ /pubmed/34394043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699927 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhao, Lv, Adam, Xie, Wang, Bai, Wang, Shan, Wang, Liu, Dang, Wang and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Zhao, Xueliang
Lv, Yunyang
Adam, Fathalrhman Eisa Addoma
Xie, Qingfang
Wang, Bin
Bai, Xindong
Wang, Xiaoyuan
Shan, Honghu
Wang, Xinglong
Liu, Haijin
Dang, Ruyi
Wang, Juan
Yang, Zengqi
Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title_full Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title_fullStr Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title_short Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Genes, Phylogroups, and Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli Isolated From Intensive Farming and Free-Range Sheep
title_sort comparison of antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, phylogroups, and biofilm formation of escherichia coli isolated from intensive farming and free-range sheep
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.699927
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxueliang comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT lvyunyang comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT adamfathalrhmaneisaaddoma comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT xieqingfang comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT wangbin comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT baixindong comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT wangxiaoyuan comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT shanhonghu comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT wangxinglong comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT liuhaijin comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT dangruyi comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT wangjuan comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep
AT yangzengqi comparisonofantimicrobialresistancevirulencegenesphylogroupsandbiofilmformationofescherichiacoliisolatedfromintensivefarmingandfreerangesheep