Cargando…

Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients

PURPOSE: Earlier work showed that IVIM‐NET(orig), an unsupervised physics‐informed deep neural network, was faster and more accurate than other state‐of‐the‐art intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). This study presents a substantially improved ve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaandorp, Misha P. T., Barbieri, Sebastiano, Klaassen, Remy, van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M., Crezee, Hans, While, Peter T., Nederveen, Aart J., Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34105184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28852
_version_ 1783738086724730880
author Kaandorp, Misha P. T.
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Klaassen, Remy
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Crezee, Hans
While, Peter T.
Nederveen, Aart J.
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
author_facet Kaandorp, Misha P. T.
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Klaassen, Remy
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Crezee, Hans
While, Peter T.
Nederveen, Aart J.
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
author_sort Kaandorp, Misha P. T.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Earlier work showed that IVIM‐NET(orig), an unsupervised physics‐informed deep neural network, was faster and more accurate than other state‐of‐the‐art intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). This study presents a substantially improved version, IVIM‐NET(optim), and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic cancer patients. METHOD: In simulations (signal‐to‐noise ratio [SNR] = 20), the accuracy, independence, and consistency of IVIM‐NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, number of hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the normalized root‐mean‐square error (NRMSE), Spearman’s ρ, and the coefficient of variation (CV(NET)), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM‐NET(optim) was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM‐NET(optim)’s performance was evaluated in an independent dataset of 23 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Fourteen of the patients received no treatment between two repeated scan sessions and nine received chemoradiotherapy between the repeated sessions. Intersession within‐subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment‐induced changes were assessed. RESULTS: In simulations (SNR = 20), IVIM‐NET(optim) outperformed IVIM‐NET(orig) in accuracy (NRMSE(D) = 0.177 vs 0.196; NMRSE(f) = 0.220 vs 0.267; NMRSE(D*) = 0.386 vs 0.393), independence (ρ(D*, f) = 0.22 vs 0.74), and consistency (CV(NET)(D) = 0.013 vs 0.104; CV(NET)(f) = 0.020 vs 0.054; CV(NET)(D*) = 0.036 vs 0.110). IVIM‐NET(optim) showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs < 50. In vivo, IVIM‐NET(optim) showed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM‐NET(optim) detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day‐to‐day variations. CONCLUSION: IVIM‐NET(optim) is recommended for accurate, informative, and consistent IVIM fitting to DWI data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8362093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83620932021-08-17 Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients Kaandorp, Misha P. T. Barbieri, Sebastiano Klaassen, Remy van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Crezee, Hans While, Peter T. Nederveen, Aart J. Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J. Magn Reson Med Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: Earlier work showed that IVIM‐NET(orig), an unsupervised physics‐informed deep neural network, was faster and more accurate than other state‐of‐the‐art intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI). This study presents a substantially improved version, IVIM‐NET(optim), and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic cancer patients. METHOD: In simulations (signal‐to‐noise ratio [SNR] = 20), the accuracy, independence, and consistency of IVIM‐NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, number of hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the normalized root‐mean‐square error (NRMSE), Spearman’s ρ, and the coefficient of variation (CV(NET)), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM‐NET(optim) was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM‐NET(optim)’s performance was evaluated in an independent dataset of 23 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Fourteen of the patients received no treatment between two repeated scan sessions and nine received chemoradiotherapy between the repeated sessions. Intersession within‐subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment‐induced changes were assessed. RESULTS: In simulations (SNR = 20), IVIM‐NET(optim) outperformed IVIM‐NET(orig) in accuracy (NRMSE(D) = 0.177 vs 0.196; NMRSE(f) = 0.220 vs 0.267; NMRSE(D*) = 0.386 vs 0.393), independence (ρ(D*, f) = 0.22 vs 0.74), and consistency (CV(NET)(D) = 0.013 vs 0.104; CV(NET)(f) = 0.020 vs 0.054; CV(NET)(D*) = 0.036 vs 0.110). IVIM‐NET(optim) showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs < 50. In vivo, IVIM‐NET(optim) showed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM‐NET(optim) detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day‐to‐day variations. CONCLUSION: IVIM‐NET(optim) is recommended for accurate, informative, and consistent IVIM fitting to DWI data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-09 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8362093/ /pubmed/34105184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28852 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
Kaandorp, Misha P. T.
Barbieri, Sebastiano
Klaassen, Remy
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Crezee, Hans
While, Peter T.
Nederveen, Aart J.
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title_fullStr Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title_short Improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
title_sort improved unsupervised physics‐informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patients
topic Research Articles—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34105184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28852
work_keys_str_mv AT kaandorpmishapt improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT barbierisebastiano improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT klaassenremy improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT crezeehans improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT whilepetert improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT nederveenaartj improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT gurneychampionoliverj improvedunsupervisedphysicsinformeddeeplearningforintravoxelincoherentmotionmodelingandevaluationinpancreaticcancerpatients