Cargando…
Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer
INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-(PSMA-PET) imaging facilitates dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (DE-SRT) with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) for PET-positive lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we aimed to compare toxicity r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715020 |
_version_ | 1783738139332837376 |
---|---|
author | Vogel, Marco M. E. Dewes, Sabrina Sage, Eva K. Devecka, Michal Eitz, Kerstin A. Gschwend, Jürgen E. Eiber, Matthias Combs, Stephanie E. Schiller, Kilian |
author_facet | Vogel, Marco M. E. Dewes, Sabrina Sage, Eva K. Devecka, Michal Eitz, Kerstin A. Gschwend, Jürgen E. Eiber, Matthias Combs, Stephanie E. Schiller, Kilian |
author_sort | Vogel, Marco M. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-(PSMA-PET) imaging facilitates dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (DE-SRT) with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) for PET-positive lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we aimed to compare toxicity rates of DE-SRT with SIB to conventional SRT (C-SRT) without SIB and to report outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 199 patients who were treated with SRT between June 2014 and June 2020. 101 patients received DE-SRT with SIB for PET-positive local recurrence and/or PET-positive lymph nodes. 98 patients were treated with C-SRT to the prostate bed +/− elective pelvic lymphatic pathways without SIB. All patients received PSMA-PET imaging prior to DE-SRT ([68Ga]PSMA-11: 45.5%; [18F]-labeled PSMA: 54.5%). Toxicity rates for early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities rectal bleeding, proctitis, stool incontinence, and genitourinary (GU) toxicities hematuria, cystitis, urine incontinence, urinary obstruction, and erectile dysfunction were assessed. Further, we analyzed the outcome with disease-free survival (DFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. RESULTS: The overall toxicity rates for early GI (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 1.0%) and late GI (C-SRT: 1.4%, DE-SRT: 5.3%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were similar. Early GU (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 3.0%) and late GU (C-SRT: 11.0%, DE-SRT: 14.7%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were comparable, as well. Early and late toxicity rates did not differ significantly between DE-SRT versus C-SRT in all subcategories (p>0.05). PSA response (PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml) in the overall group of patients with DE-SRT was 75.0% and 86.4% at first and last follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: DE-SRT showed no significantly increased toxicity rates compared with C-SRT and thus is feasible. The outcome of DE-SRT showed good results. Therefore, DE-SRT with a PSMA-PET-based SIB can be considered for the personalized treatment in patients with recurrent PC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8362325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83623252021-08-14 Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer Vogel, Marco M. E. Dewes, Sabrina Sage, Eva K. Devecka, Michal Eitz, Kerstin A. Gschwend, Jürgen E. Eiber, Matthias Combs, Stephanie E. Schiller, Kilian Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-(PSMA-PET) imaging facilitates dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy (DE-SRT) with simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) for PET-positive lesions in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we aimed to compare toxicity rates of DE-SRT with SIB to conventional SRT (C-SRT) without SIB and to report outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 199 patients who were treated with SRT between June 2014 and June 2020. 101 patients received DE-SRT with SIB for PET-positive local recurrence and/or PET-positive lymph nodes. 98 patients were treated with C-SRT to the prostate bed +/− elective pelvic lymphatic pathways without SIB. All patients received PSMA-PET imaging prior to DE-SRT ([68Ga]PSMA-11: 45.5%; [18F]-labeled PSMA: 54.5%). Toxicity rates for early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities rectal bleeding, proctitis, stool incontinence, and genitourinary (GU) toxicities hematuria, cystitis, urine incontinence, urinary obstruction, and erectile dysfunction were assessed. Further, we analyzed the outcome with disease-free survival (DFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. RESULTS: The overall toxicity rates for early GI (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 1.0%) and late GI (C-SRT: 1.4%, DE-SRT: 5.3%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were similar. Early GU (C-SRT: 2.1%, DE-SRT: 3.0%) and late GU (C-SRT: 11.0%, DE-SRT: 14.7%) toxicities ≥ grade 2 were comparable, as well. Early and late toxicity rates did not differ significantly between DE-SRT versus C-SRT in all subcategories (p>0.05). PSA response (PSA ≤0.2 ng/ml) in the overall group of patients with DE-SRT was 75.0% and 86.4% at first and last follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: DE-SRT showed no significantly increased toxicity rates compared with C-SRT and thus is feasible. The outcome of DE-SRT showed good results. Therefore, DE-SRT with a PSMA-PET-based SIB can be considered for the personalized treatment in patients with recurrent PC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8362325/ /pubmed/34395288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715020 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vogel, Dewes, Sage, Devecka, Eitz, Gschwend, Eiber, Combs and Schiller https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Vogel, Marco M. E. Dewes, Sabrina Sage, Eva K. Devecka, Michal Eitz, Kerstin A. Gschwend, Jürgen E. Eiber, Matthias Combs, Stephanie E. Schiller, Kilian Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title | Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Feasibility and Outcome of PSMA-PET-Based Dose-Escalated Salvage Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Salvage Radiotherapy for Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | feasibility and outcome of psma-pet-based dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy versus conventional salvage radiotherapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.715020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogelmarcome feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT dewessabrina feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT sageevak feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT deveckamichal feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT eitzkerstina feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT gschwendjurgene feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT eibermatthias feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT combsstephaniee feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer AT schillerkilian feasibilityandoutcomeofpsmapetbaseddoseescalatedsalvageradiotherapyversusconventionalsalvageradiotherapyforpatientswithrecurrentprostatecancer |