Cargando…

Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for RP, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallum, Luke E., Dakin, Steven C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.8
_version_ 1783738206299095040
author Hallum, Luke E.
Dakin, Steven C.
author_facet Hallum, Luke E.
Dakin, Steven C.
author_sort Hallum, Luke E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for RP, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-related outcomes resulting from retinal implantation in participants with RP. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for journal articles published since January 1, 2015. We selected articles describing studies of implanted participants that reported the postimplantation measurement of vision. We extracted study information including design, participants’ residual vision, comparators, and assessed outcomes. To assess the risk of bias, we used signaling questions and a target trial. RESULTS: Our search returned 425 abstracts. We reviewed the full text of 34 articles. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias owing to the study design or experimental conduct. Regarding design, studies lacked the measures that typical clinical trials take to protect against bias (e.g., control groups and masking). Regarding experimental conduct, outcome measures were rarely comparable before and after implantation, and psychophysical methods were prone to bias (subjective, not forced choice, methods). The most common comparison found was between postimplantation visual function with the device powered off versus on. This comparison is at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for high-quality evidence of efficacy of retinal implantation to treat RP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: For patients and clinicians to make informed choices about RP treatment, visual function restored by retinal implantation must be properly quantified and reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8362638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83626382021-08-24 Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review Hallum, Luke E. Dakin, Steven C. Transl Vis Sci Technol Special Issue PURPOSE: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for RP, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-related outcomes resulting from retinal implantation in participants with RP. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for journal articles published since January 1, 2015. We selected articles describing studies of implanted participants that reported the postimplantation measurement of vision. We extracted study information including design, participants’ residual vision, comparators, and assessed outcomes. To assess the risk of bias, we used signaling questions and a target trial. RESULTS: Our search returned 425 abstracts. We reviewed the full text of 34 articles. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias owing to the study design or experimental conduct. Regarding design, studies lacked the measures that typical clinical trials take to protect against bias (e.g., control groups and masking). Regarding experimental conduct, outcome measures were rarely comparable before and after implantation, and psychophysical methods were prone to bias (subjective, not forced choice, methods). The most common comparison found was between postimplantation visual function with the device powered off versus on. This comparison is at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for high-quality evidence of efficacy of retinal implantation to treat RP. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: For patients and clinicians to make informed choices about RP treatment, visual function restored by retinal implantation must be properly quantified and reported. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8362638/ /pubmed/34383874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.8 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Special Issue
Hallum, Luke E.
Dakin, Steven C.
Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title_full Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title_short Retinal Implantation of Electronic Vision Prostheses to Treat Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review
title_sort retinal implantation of electronic vision prostheses to treat retinitis pigmentosa: a systematic review
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.10.8
work_keys_str_mv AT hallumlukee retinalimplantationofelectronicvisionprosthesestotreatretinitispigmentosaasystematicreview
AT dakinstevenc retinalimplantationofelectronicvisionprosthesestotreatretinitispigmentosaasystematicreview