Cargando…

Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019

OBJECTIVE: To quantify general practitioners’ (GPs’) turnover in England between 2007 and 2019, describe trends over time, regional differences and associations with social deprivation or other practice characteristics. DESIGN: A retrospective study of annual cross-sectional data. SETTING: All gener...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parisi, Rosa, Lau, Yiu-Shing, Bower, Peter, Checkland, Kath, Rubery, Jill, Sutton, Matt, Giles, Sally J, Esmail, Aneez, Spooner, Sharon, Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049827
_version_ 1783738216957870080
author Parisi, Rosa
Lau, Yiu-Shing
Bower, Peter
Checkland, Kath
Rubery, Jill
Sutton, Matt
Giles, Sally J
Esmail, Aneez
Spooner, Sharon
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
author_facet Parisi, Rosa
Lau, Yiu-Shing
Bower, Peter
Checkland, Kath
Rubery, Jill
Sutton, Matt
Giles, Sally J
Esmail, Aneez
Spooner, Sharon
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
author_sort Parisi, Rosa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To quantify general practitioners’ (GPs’) turnover in England between 2007 and 2019, describe trends over time, regional differences and associations with social deprivation or other practice characteristics. DESIGN: A retrospective study of annual cross-sectional data. SETTING: All general practices in England (8085 in 2007, 6598 in 2019). METHODS: We calculated turnover rates, defined as the proportion of GPs leaving a practice. Rates and their median, 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated by year and region. The proportion of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) over consecutive years were also calculated. A negative binomial regression model assessed the association between turnover and social deprivation or other practice characteristics. RESULTS: Turnover rates increased over time. The 75th percentile in 2009 was 11%, but increased to 14% in 2019. The highest turnover rate was observed in 2013–2014, corresponding to the 75th percentile of 18.2%. Over time, regions experienced increases in turnover rates, although it varied across English regions. The proportion of practices with high (10% to 40%) turnover within a year almost doubled from 14% in 2009 to 27% in 2019. A rise in the number of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) for at least three consecutive years was also observed, from 2.7% (2.3%–3.1%) in 2007 to 6.3% (5.7%–6.9%) in 2017. The statistical analyses revealed that practice-area deprivation was moderately associated with turnover rate, with practices in the most deprived area having higher turnover rates compared with practices in the least deprived areas (incidence rate ratios 1.09; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: GP turnover has increased in the last decade nationally, with regional variability. Greater attention to GP turnover is needed, in the most deprived areas in particular, where GPs often need to deal with more complex health needs. There is a large cost associated with GP turnover and practices with very high persistent turnover need to be further researched, and the causes behind this identified, to allow support strategies and policies to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8362689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83626892021-08-30 Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019 Parisi, Rosa Lau, Yiu-Shing Bower, Peter Checkland, Kath Rubery, Jill Sutton, Matt Giles, Sally J Esmail, Aneez Spooner, Sharon Kontopantelis, Evangelos BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To quantify general practitioners’ (GPs’) turnover in England between 2007 and 2019, describe trends over time, regional differences and associations with social deprivation or other practice characteristics. DESIGN: A retrospective study of annual cross-sectional data. SETTING: All general practices in England (8085 in 2007, 6598 in 2019). METHODS: We calculated turnover rates, defined as the proportion of GPs leaving a practice. Rates and their median, 25th and 75th percentiles were calculated by year and region. The proportion of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) over consecutive years were also calculated. A negative binomial regression model assessed the association between turnover and social deprivation or other practice characteristics. RESULTS: Turnover rates increased over time. The 75th percentile in 2009 was 11%, but increased to 14% in 2019. The highest turnover rate was observed in 2013–2014, corresponding to the 75th percentile of 18.2%. Over time, regions experienced increases in turnover rates, although it varied across English regions. The proportion of practices with high (10% to 40%) turnover within a year almost doubled from 14% in 2009 to 27% in 2019. A rise in the number of practices with persistent high turnover (>10%) for at least three consecutive years was also observed, from 2.7% (2.3%–3.1%) in 2007 to 6.3% (5.7%–6.9%) in 2017. The statistical analyses revealed that practice-area deprivation was moderately associated with turnover rate, with practices in the most deprived area having higher turnover rates compared with practices in the least deprived areas (incidence rate ratios 1.09; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: GP turnover has increased in the last decade nationally, with regional variability. Greater attention to GP turnover is needed, in the most deprived areas in particular, where GPs often need to deal with more complex health needs. There is a large cost associated with GP turnover and practices with very high persistent turnover need to be further researched, and the causes behind this identified, to allow support strategies and policies to be developed. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8362689/ /pubmed/34420932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049827 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Parisi, Rosa
Lau, Yiu-Shing
Bower, Peter
Checkland, Kath
Rubery, Jill
Sutton, Matt
Giles, Sally J
Esmail, Aneez
Spooner, Sharon
Kontopantelis, Evangelos
Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title_full Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title_fullStr Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title_full_unstemmed Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title_short Rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all English general practices between 2007 and 2019
title_sort rates of turnover among general practitioners: a retrospective study of all english general practices between 2007 and 2019
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8362689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049827
work_keys_str_mv AT parisirosa ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT lauyiushing ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT bowerpeter ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT checklandkath ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT ruberyjill ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT suttonmatt ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT gilessallyj ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT esmailaneez ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT spoonersharon ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019
AT kontopantelisevangelos ratesofturnoveramonggeneralpractitionersaretrospectivestudyofallenglishgeneralpracticesbetween2007and2019