Cargando…

Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study

Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monthony, Adrian S., Kyne, Sean T., Grainger, Christopher M., Jones, Andrew Maxwell P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525
_version_ 1783738282617602048
author Monthony, Adrian S.
Kyne, Sean T.
Grainger, Christopher M.
Jones, Andrew Maxwell P.
author_facet Monthony, Adrian S.
Kyne, Sean T.
Grainger, Christopher M.
Jones, Andrew Maxwell P.
author_sort Monthony, Adrian S.
collection PubMed
description Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration from leaf explants with a 96% response rate, producing an average of 12.3 shoots per explant in a single drug-type accession. Despite the importance regeneration plays in plant biotechnology and the renewed interest in this crop the aforementioned protocol has not been used in subsequent papers in the decade since it was published, raising concerns over its reproducibility. Here we attempted to replicate this important Cannabis regeneration study and expand the original scope of the study by testing it across 10 drug-type C. sativa genotypes to assess genotypic variation. In our study, callus was induced in all 10 genotypes but callus growth and appearance substantially differed among cultivars, with the most responsive genotype producing 6-fold more callus than the least responsive. The shoot induction medium failed to induce shoot organogenesis in any of the 10 cultivars tested, instead resulting in necrosis of the calli. The findings of this replication study raise concerns about the replicability of existing methods. However, some details of the protocol could not be replicated due to missing details in the original paper and regulatory issues, which could have impacted the outcome. These results highlight the importance of using multiple genotypes in such studies and providing detailed methods to facilitate replication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8363012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83630122021-08-14 Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study Monthony, Adrian S. Kyne, Sean T. Grainger, Christopher M. Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. PLoS One Research Article Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration from leaf explants with a 96% response rate, producing an average of 12.3 shoots per explant in a single drug-type accession. Despite the importance regeneration plays in plant biotechnology and the renewed interest in this crop the aforementioned protocol has not been used in subsequent papers in the decade since it was published, raising concerns over its reproducibility. Here we attempted to replicate this important Cannabis regeneration study and expand the original scope of the study by testing it across 10 drug-type C. sativa genotypes to assess genotypic variation. In our study, callus was induced in all 10 genotypes but callus growth and appearance substantially differed among cultivars, with the most responsive genotype producing 6-fold more callus than the least responsive. The shoot induction medium failed to induce shoot organogenesis in any of the 10 cultivars tested, instead resulting in necrosis of the calli. The findings of this replication study raise concerns about the replicability of existing methods. However, some details of the protocol could not be replicated due to missing details in the original paper and regulatory issues, which could have impacted the outcome. These results highlight the importance of using multiple genotypes in such studies and providing detailed methods to facilitate replication. Public Library of Science 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8363012/ /pubmed/34388148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525 Text en © 2021 Monthony et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Monthony, Adrian S.
Kyne, Sean T.
Grainger, Christopher M.
Jones, Andrew Maxwell P.
Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title_full Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title_fullStr Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title_full_unstemmed Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title_short Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
title_sort recalcitrance of cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525
work_keys_str_mv AT monthonyadrians recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy
AT kyneseant recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy
AT graingerchristopherm recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy
AT jonesandrewmaxwellp recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy