Cargando…
Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study
Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525 |
_version_ | 1783738282617602048 |
---|---|
author | Monthony, Adrian S. Kyne, Sean T. Grainger, Christopher M. Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. |
author_facet | Monthony, Adrian S. Kyne, Sean T. Grainger, Christopher M. Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. |
author_sort | Monthony, Adrian S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration from leaf explants with a 96% response rate, producing an average of 12.3 shoots per explant in a single drug-type accession. Despite the importance regeneration plays in plant biotechnology and the renewed interest in this crop the aforementioned protocol has not been used in subsequent papers in the decade since it was published, raising concerns over its reproducibility. Here we attempted to replicate this important Cannabis regeneration study and expand the original scope of the study by testing it across 10 drug-type C. sativa genotypes to assess genotypic variation. In our study, callus was induced in all 10 genotypes but callus growth and appearance substantially differed among cultivars, with the most responsive genotype producing 6-fold more callus than the least responsive. The shoot induction medium failed to induce shoot organogenesis in any of the 10 cultivars tested, instead resulting in necrosis of the calli. The findings of this replication study raise concerns about the replicability of existing methods. However, some details of the protocol could not be replicated due to missing details in the original paper and regulatory issues, which could have impacted the outcome. These results highlight the importance of using multiple genotypes in such studies and providing detailed methods to facilitate replication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8363012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83630122021-08-14 Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study Monthony, Adrian S. Kyne, Sean T. Grainger, Christopher M. Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. PLoS One Research Article Cannabis sativa is relatively recalcitrant to de novo regeneration, but several studies have reported shoot organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis from non-meristematic tissues. Most report infrequent regeneration rates from these tissues, but a landmark publication from 2010 achieved regeneration from leaf explants with a 96% response rate, producing an average of 12.3 shoots per explant in a single drug-type accession. Despite the importance regeneration plays in plant biotechnology and the renewed interest in this crop the aforementioned protocol has not been used in subsequent papers in the decade since it was published, raising concerns over its reproducibility. Here we attempted to replicate this important Cannabis regeneration study and expand the original scope of the study by testing it across 10 drug-type C. sativa genotypes to assess genotypic variation. In our study, callus was induced in all 10 genotypes but callus growth and appearance substantially differed among cultivars, with the most responsive genotype producing 6-fold more callus than the least responsive. The shoot induction medium failed to induce shoot organogenesis in any of the 10 cultivars tested, instead resulting in necrosis of the calli. The findings of this replication study raise concerns about the replicability of existing methods. However, some details of the protocol could not be replicated due to missing details in the original paper and regulatory issues, which could have impacted the outcome. These results highlight the importance of using multiple genotypes in such studies and providing detailed methods to facilitate replication. Public Library of Science 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8363012/ /pubmed/34388148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525 Text en © 2021 Monthony et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Monthony, Adrian S. Kyne, Sean T. Grainger, Christopher M. Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title | Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title_full | Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title_fullStr | Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title_short | Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
title_sort | recalcitrance of cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34388148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monthonyadrians recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy AT kyneseant recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy AT graingerchristopherm recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy AT jonesandrewmaxwellp recalcitranceofcannabissativatodenovoregenerationamultigenotypereplicationstudy |